Overview

Title

To redesignate Rock Creek Park in the District of Columbia as Rock Creek National Park.

ELI5 AI

H.R. 8122 wants to change the name of Rock Creek Park in Washington, D.C., to Rock Creek National Park to show how special it is; it's like giving the park a new title to make sure everyone knows how important and fun it is!

Summary AI

H. R. 8122 is a bill proposed to change the name of Rock Creek Park in Washington, D.C., to Rock Creek National Park. The designation aims to acknowledge the park's significant natural, cultural, and historical elements, along with its recreational offerings. The bill also updates relevant legal codes and documents to reflect this change in designation. Any mention of Rock Creek Park in existing U.S. laws or records will now refer to Rock Creek National Park.

Published

2024-04-23
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Introduced in House
Date: 2024-04-23
Package ID: BILLS-118hr8122ih

Keywords AI

rock creek national park redesignation district of columbia park management financial implications local stakeholders funding priorities national park legal references h. r. 8122

Sources

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
2
Words:
308
Pages:
2
Sentences:
8

Language

Nouns: 116
Verbs: 17
Adjectives: 8
Adverbs: 1
Numbers: 15
Entities: 37

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.05
Average Sentence Length:
38.50
Token Entropy:
4.25
Readability (ARI):
20.10

AnalysisAI

Summary of the Bill

The proposed legislation aims to change the designation of Rock Creek Park in the District of Columbia to Rock Creek National Park. This change recognizes the park's nationally important natural, cultural, and historical resources, as well as the recreational opportunities it offers. The bill updates legal references within U.S. Code to reflect this new designation and clarifies that any mention of Rock Creek Park in existing laws or documents should be considered a reference to Rock Creek National Park.

Significant Issues

A major issue with this bill is its lack of clarity regarding the financial implications of redesignating the park. The bill does not address potential costs associated with updating signage, maps, and documents to reflect the new name. Moreover, it is silent on whether this redesignation would impact the park's management or operational procedures. The absence of details on how local stakeholders might be affected further complicates understanding the bill's full impact. Additionally, the language used in regard to updating references could lead to confusion, as it does not specify the administrative process for ensuring all documents are updated appropriately.

Impacts on the Public

For the general public, the redesignation of Rock Creek Park as a national park might enhance its prestige and attract more visitors interested in its historical and cultural significance. This shift could lead to increased tourism and economic benefits for the District of Columbia. However, without clarity on potential costs, it is uncertain whether taxpayers would bear any financial burden related to the name change. Additionally, the bill provides no insights into any operational changes that might influence how visitors experience the park.

Impacts on Specific Stakeholders

Local residents, park managers, and businesses in the vicinity could be significantly affected by this legislative change. For residents, the shift to a national park might bring about changes in park governance, possibly altering access or the availability of services. Park management would need to adjust to new operational standards fitting its new status and address the technicalities of updating legal and administrative records. Businesses surrounding the park could potentially benefit from increased foot traffic and tourism, though this would depend on effective marketing and infrastructural support to accommodate a potential influx of visitors.

Overall, while the bill's intentions to honor Rock Creek Park's significance are clear, there are crucial oversight areas concerning implementation and potential impacts that need further clarification to ensure the legislation achieves its intended benefits without unintended negative consequences.

Issues

  • Section 2: There is no mention of the financial implications of the redesignation. This could affect budgeting and resource allocation for changes like signage, maps, and documents which may require funding and planning that is not addressed in the bill.

  • Section 2: The section does not specify how the redesignation might impact park management or operations, leaving a gap in understanding potential changes in administration or policies.

  • Section 2: There are no details on potential implications for local stakeholders or the impact on funding priorities, both short-term and long-term, for the park, which may affect community interests and local governance.

  • Section 2: The language used in referencing other documents as 'deemed to be a reference' could be ambiguous, potentially causing confusion in implementing the changes across all legal and administrative documents.

  • Section 1: The section is titled 'Short title' but does not provide additional context or details about the contents of the Act, making it challenging to identify the broader intentions or any potential additional clauses not elaborated upon.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The first section of the bill states that the official name of the legislation is the "Rock Creek National Park Act of 2024".

2. Redesignation of Rock Creek Park as Rock Creek National Park Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The bill section redesignates Rock Creek Park in the District of Columbia as Rock Creek National Park to acknowledge its importance. It also updates any legal references to reflect this name change.