Overview
Title
To amend title 28, United States Code, to limit the use of Federal funds for live tissue training for Department of Justice personnel.
ELI5 AI
The bill wants to stop the government from spending money on training using real animal parts for people who work in justice unless it's absolutely necessary and there's no other way, like using fake parts.
Summary AI
H.R. 8116 proposes to amend title 28 of the United States Code by introducing a limitation on the use of federal funds for live tissue training for Department of Justice personnel. The bill specifies that federal money cannot be used for this type of training unless the Attorney General determines in writing that it is medically necessary and cannot be substituted with human-based training methods like simulators. The goal is to prioritize non-animal based training methods, thus potentially reducing the use of live animals in medical training exercises.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
Summary of the Bill
House Bill 8116, titled the "Stop Wasteful and Outdated Medical Training on Animals Act," aims to amend Title 28 of the United States Code to restrict the use of federal funds in conducting live tissue training for Department of Justice (DOJ) personnel. This type of training involves the infliction of wounds on live animals to prepare personnel for treating human injuries. The bill proposes that federal funds should not be used for this purpose unless the Attorney General issues a nondelegable written determination deeming such training medically necessary and not replicable by simulators or human-based training methods.
Significant Issues
Several issues arise from this legislative proposal. Firstly, the bill permits an exception to the restriction if the Attorney General considers the training medically necessary. However, the term "medically necessary" is not clearly defined, paving the way for subjective interpretations. This ambiguity could lead to inconsistencies in the application of the restriction. Additionally, the Attorney General's decision is nondelegable, which centers decision-making power without clear oversight, possibly reducing accountability and transparency.
Another important issue is the bill's limited scope; it applies specifically to the DOJ, without addressing whether similar practices exist in other government departments. This could result in inconsistent policy enforcement across different federal departments. Moreover, the bill does not detail mechanisms for oversight and compliance, which may hinder effective monitoring of the restriction on federal fund usage.
Broad Impact on the Public
The public might broadly perceive this bill as a progressive step towards ending the use of live animals in medical training, aligning federal practices with evolving ethical standards that prefer humane and advanced training methods. By restricting federal funding for live tissue training, the bill encourages the development and use of alternative training technologies, such as simulators, which could enhance training effectiveness and ethical standards. However, the process of determining what constitutes "medically necessary" live tissue training remains a key point of contention and concern.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
For animal rights advocates, this bill represents a positive legislative move toward the humane treatment of animals, signaling a commitment to modernizing training techniques in government agencies. It potentially reduces animal suffering by limiting live tissue training unless absolutely necessary.
Conversely, for personnel within the DOJ who rely on live tissue training, the bill might initially challenge existing training protocols. They may express concerns over whether alternative methods can provide equally effective preparation for real-world scenarios.
Medical and simulation technology companies could benefit, seeing increased demand for innovative training tools. However, this shift might require a transition period during which stakeholders adjust to new training methodologies.
In summary, while the bill aims to modernize DOJ training methods and aligns with ethical considerations regarding animal welfare, its success and acceptance hinge on defining and implementing transparent mechanisms that ensure these limitations are appropriately applied and monitored.
Issues
The clause in Section 2 allows an exception for live tissue training if determined to be medically necessary by the Attorney General, which could potentially allow for subjective interpretations or biases in decision-making. This could lead to inconsistencies in how the limitation on federal funds is applied.
The term 'medically necessary' in Section 2 is not explicitly defined. The lack of a clear definition could lead to varying interpretations and potential loopholes, making it challenging to enforce the limitations intended by the bill.
The determination by the Attorney General in Section 2 is 'nondelegable,' centralizing the decision-making power. This could potentially reduce oversight or accountability and might hinder transparency, raising concerns about checks and balances.
The amendment in Section 2 only applies to the Department of Justice and does not address whether similar practices occur or funding is available in other departments. This may lead to inconsistencies in policy application across different government departments, suggesting a possibly fragmented approach to regulating live tissue training.
There is no specific mention of oversight or reporting mechanisms in Section 2 to ensure compliance with the limitation on the use of federal funds. The absence of adequate monitoring might result in non-compliance with the intended restrictions of the bill.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section provides the short title of the Act, which can be referred to as the “Stop Wasteful and Outdated Medical Training on Animals Act.”
2. Limitation on use of Federal funds for live tissue training Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section limits the use of Federal funds by the Department of Justice for live tissue training, which involves using live animals to teach medical procedures, unless the Attorney General determines it is medically necessary and cannot be done with simulators or human-based methods. It defines key terms like "Federal funds," "human-based training methods," and "live tissue training."