Overview
Title
To establish a competitive grant program to support the establishment, expansion, or enhancement of youth mentoring programs for eligible youth, and to provide for social and emotional learning, employability skill development, career exploration, work-based learning, and other youth workforce opportunities.
ELI5 AI
H.R. 811 is a plan to give money to groups and schools to help kids learn important skills, like making friends and finding jobs. The idea is to support kids who might not have as much help, like those from neighborhoods with fewer opportunities.
Summary AI
H.R. 811 aims to establish a grant program to support and enhance youth mentoring programs. It focuses on providing eligible youth with skills in social and emotional learning, career exploration, and employability. The bill encourages partnerships between community organizations, educational agencies, and employers to provide mentoring, work-based learning, and career readiness activities. The program prioritizes youth from underserved or high-risk communities and integrates transitional services for those transitioning out of correctional facilities or youth with disabilities.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
Summary of the Bill
The proposed bill, titled the "Mentoring to Succeed Act of 2025," aims to establish a competitive grant program to support youth mentoring programs. These programs will focus on providing resources for social and emotional learning, skill development, career exploration, and various workforce opportunities for young individuals. The bill outlines the creation of programs through community-based organizations or partnerships to help youth prepare for educational and workforce success. It also includes provisions for mentor training and specific activities that should be implemented.
Significant Issues
A notable issue with the bill is the lack of clear criteria for what qualifies as an "underserved community" or a "community with employment disparities." This lack of clarity may result in ambiguous implementation and distribution of grants. Additionally, the bill authorizes funding from 2026 to 2030 without setting clear financial limits, opening the door to potential overspending.
The language describing the responsibilities of the Secretary and grant allocations is broad and somewhat vague, which could lead to misallocation or inefficient use of funds. Similarly, the definition of "mentoring" is wide-ranging, allowing for a variety of interpretations and potential inconsistencies in how programs are executed. There is also concern about the absence of detailed accountability mechanisms for evaluating the effectiveness of funded programs, which may hinder oversight.
The section concerning the study by the Secretary of Labor lacks specific details for identifying successful mentoring programs, thus posing a risk of subjective evaluation.
Impact on the Public
Broadly, the bill has the potential to positively impact youth by providing them with valuable mentoring experiences and resources for personal and professional development. If effectively implemented, it could enhance educational and employment prospects for young individuals, particularly those in underserved areas.
On the flip side, the ambiguous definitions and lack of accountability measures could undermine the program's effectiveness. Without clear criteria and robust oversight, there's a risk of resources being allocated in ways that do not maximize benefits for the intended communities.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Youth and Families: Young people, especially those from marginalized backgrounds, stand to benefit significantly from the mentoring programs. These initiatives could offer guidance and support that schools or families might be unable to provide fully.
Community-Based Organizations: Nonprofit organizations and partnerships that work with youth might see increased opportunities for funding and collaboration. However, they may also face challenges in navigating the complex application and compliance processes due to the technical language and extensive requirements.
Policymakers and Administrators: Those responsible for implementing the bill must be prepared to address the ambiguities in the language to ensure effective application. They will need to establish clear criteria and accountability measures to maximize the impact of the grants.
Mentors: Individuals volunteering or working as mentors may benefit from structured training and support. However, they might also face increased bureaucratic demands due to the broad and detailed requirements within the bill.
In summary, while the bill has admirable goals that could provide substantial support and development opportunities for young people, the current challenges in its language and structure need to be addressed to ensure its success and positive impact on stakeholders.
Issues
The lack of specific criteria or detailed explanation for what constitutes 'underserved communities' or 'communities with employment disparities' in Section 2 could lead to ambiguity in implementation and potential inequity in grant distribution.
The authorization of such sums as may be necessary for fiscal years 2026 through 2030 in Section 2, without specifying limits, might lead to excessive or unregulated spending.
The broad language used in Section 172(c)(1) regarding the Secretary awarding grants does not specify a cap or specific allocation of funds, potentially leading to overspending or misallocation.
The absence of a clear mechanism for ensuring accountability or evaluation of the effectiveness of mentoring programs in Section 2, beyond basic reporting requirements, may limit oversight and performance measurement.
The definition of 'mentoring' in Section 172(b)(8) is broad and could encompass a wide range of activities, leading to potential inconsistencies in program implementation.
Section 3 does not specify how the Secretary of Labor will identify 'successful mentoring programs,' which introduces the risk of subjective bias in selection.
The complexity and technical nature of the language used in Sections 2 and 172 make it difficult for some stakeholders to fully grasp the implications or participate in discussions about the bill.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section, titled "Short title," allows the Act to be referred to as the "Mentoring to Succeed Act of 2025."
2. Youth mentoring programs Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill section outlines the establishment and support of youth mentoring programs to help young people develop skills and prepare for future success in education and the workforce. It allows grants for community organizations and partnerships to create these programs, especially targeting underserved areas, and includes detailed requirements for mentor training, activities, and reporting on program effectiveness.
172. Youth mentoring programs Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The text is about a program aimed at supporting mentoring initiatives for certain young people. It explains the purpose of these programs, the types of organizations and partnerships eligible to participate, and the activities the grants can fund. The goal is to help these youth develop important skills for school and work, involving mentors who can guide them through setting and achieving goals. The text also includes details about grant application requirements, priorities for funding, reporting duties, and resources available for the development and implementation of mentoring programs.
3. Study on mentoring programs Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section mandates the Secretary of Labor, through the Chief Evaluation Officer, to conduct a study to find effective mentoring programs, assess how mentors can help with students' learning and job readiness, and evaluate a related grant program's impact on student success and career development. The study results must be reported to congressional committees within three years of the bill's enactment.