Overview
Title
An Act To establish the Jackie Robinson Ballpark National Commemorative Site in the State of Florida, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
The bill wants to make a special site in Florida to remember Jackie Robinson, a famous baseball player who broke barriers. It says the site will help teach people about history, but it won't be like a big national park, and some people are worried about how it will be managed and protected.
Summary AI
H.R. 8012 proposes to designate the Jackie Robinson Ballpark in Daytona Beach, Florida, as the Jackie Robinson Ballpark National Commemorative Site. The bill outlines that the site will become part of the African American Civil Rights Network but will not be a unit of the National Park System. It also grants the Secretary of the Interior permission to create cooperative agreements for educational purposes and to conduct a study evaluating the site's significance, with findings to be reported back to Congress. Additionally, the bill ensures that private property rights and local land use are not affected by this designation.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
The proposed legislation titled "Jackie Robinson Ballpark National Commemorative Site Act" aims to designate the Jackie Robinson Ballpark in Daytona Beach, Florida, as a national commemorative site. This designation is not only symbolic but also connects the site to the African American Civil Rights Network. The bill highlights the historical significance of the location while aiming to preserve its legacy for future generations. Importantly, although linked to the African American Civil Rights Network, the site will not join the National Park System, which affects its governance and funding opportunities.
General Summary
The bill introduces the designation of Jackie Robinson Ballpark as a national commemorative site, aiming to recognize its historical importance further. Key components involve the possible use of cooperative agreements for educational purposes and a mandate for the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a study evaluating the site's national significance. However, the legislation explicitly limits the Secretary’s authority over land acquisition and zoning laws, ensuring that local governance remains unaffected.
Summary of Significant Issues
Several issues arise concerning the implementation and effects of the bill. First, the absence of specified funding sources for educational agreements introduces questions about financial planning and accountability. There is concern regarding the vague terms set for collaboration with entities which could result in misuse of funds or ineffective partnerships. Additionally, the bill’s clear distinction that the site will not be part of the National Park System may limit its potential for protection and consistent funding, possibly affecting its preservation. Furthermore, while a study on the site's significance is proposed, it lacks clear evaluative criteria and designated funding, which could challenge the study's execution and reliability of its findings.
Broad Public Impact
The broad public may observe this bill as a positive step toward recognizing and honoring vital historical landmarks in African American history. It encourages a stronger emphasis on understanding and commemorating civil rights movements and figures like Jackie Robinson. However, the public should be mindful of the possible practical implications related to funding and preservation that could influence the site's success as a commemorative site. Without adequate funding and clear evaluative measures, ensuring the site's upkeep and educational impact could prove challenging.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
For local stakeholders, such as the Daytona Beach community, this site designation could increase tourism and public interest, potentially stimulating local business and economic growth. Educators and historians might find valuable opportunities to engage with and utilize the site for cultural and educational purposes. On the flip side, the lack of comprehensive funding may place unexpected financial or administrative pressures on local authorities and private entities involved in site management.
Meanwhile, heritage and preservation advocates may harbor concerns about the site not being part of the National Park System. This exclusion might translate into fewer federal protections and less consistent funding, potentially jeopardizing preservation efforts over the long term.
Overall, while the bill aims to enhance recognition and preservation of an essential historical site, the outlined issues point to a need for clarified financial and administrative strategies to ensure its success and sustainability.
Issues
The bill does not specify the budget or funding sources for the cooperative agreements, which could lead to concerns about undefined spending. This is important to the public because it involves financial accountability and transparency. (Section 2(d)(1))
The terms of cooperation with public or private entities for interpretative and educational purposes are vague and could be used to direct funds inappropriately. This raises concerns about potential misuse of public funds and the integrity of collaborations. (Section 2(d)(1))
The designation of the site as not being a unit of the National Park System is clear but could potentially result in a lack of protection or funding, compromising preservation efforts. This could affect the site's upkeep and its historical integrity, which is important to the public and stakeholders. (Section 2(d)(2))
The study mandates evaluation of the site's national significance but does not specify criteria for evaluation, which may lead to arbitrary or inconsistent conclusions. The potential for arbitrary assessments could affect the site's future and its commemorative status. (Section 2(e)(1))
The bill authorizes the Secretary to conduct a special resource study but does not provide specific funding or resources to do so, which could limit the feasibility of conducting the study. This poses a challenge in determining the site's future and proper preservation efforts. (Section 2(e))
The language regarding limitations on the Secretary's authority to acquire land or affect zoning is clear, but there may be concerns regarding how this affects the site's preservation and development. This limitation could impact the ability to adequately protect and interpret the site. (Section 2(d)(3))
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section provides the short title for the Act, which is called the “Jackie Robinson Ballpark National Commemorative Site Act.”
2. Jackie Robinson Ballpark National Commemorative Site Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Jackie Robinson Ballpark in Daytona Beach, Florida, is designated as a national commemorative site and included in the African American Civil Rights Network, but it will not become a part of the National Park System. The Secretary of the Interior can make cooperative agreements for educational purposes and will study the site's significance, but cannot interfere with property rights or acquire land without permission.