Overview

Title

To amend the Trade Act of 1974 to provide for the automatic exclusion of China as a beneficiary country.

ELI5 AI

H. R. 7997 is a plan to make sure China can't be part of a special trade list, because some people think they aren't playing fair in trade. It was suggested by a person named Mr. Dunn and is now being looked at by a group in Congress.

Summary AI

H. R. 7997 seeks to modify the Trade Act of 1974 to ensure that China is automatically excluded from being recognized as a beneficiary country under the Act. This legislative move is aimed at countering what it views as China’s anti-competitive practices. The bill, titled the “Safeguarding Trade Opportunities and Preventing China’s Anti-Competitive Practices Act,” was introduced by Mr. Dunn of Florida and referred to the Committee on Ways and Means.

Published

2024-04-15
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Introduced in House
Date: 2024-04-15
Package ID: BILLS-118hr7997ih

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
2
Words:
186
Pages:
2
Sentences:
7

Language

Nouns: 59
Verbs: 12
Adjectives: 8
Adverbs: 0
Numbers: 11
Entities: 22

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.03
Average Sentence Length:
26.57
Token Entropy:
4.29
Readability (ARI):
14.06

AnalysisAI

Overview of the Bill

The bill titled "H. R. 7997," introduced in the 118th Congress, aims to amend the Trade Act of 1974. Specifically, it seeks to exclude China from being classified as a beneficiary country under this Act. The proposed legislation is succinct, with the main modification being the addition of a subparagraph that simply includes "China" under a category meant for automatic exclusion. The bill's intended purpose, as inferred from its title, is to counteract perceived anti-competitive practices by China, although the text itself does not elaborate on these practices or the rationale for this exclusion.

Significant Issues

Lack of Rationale and Clarity

One significant issue with the bill is that it does not provide a detailed explanation or rationale for why China is being specifically targeted for exclusion. This omission might lead to misunderstandings and political or diplomatic tensions, as the motivations behind the legislative change remain opaque.

Ambiguity in Language

The term "automatic exclusion" is used, but there is little clarity regarding what specific benefits or designations China is being excluded from within the context of the Trade Act of 1974. This ambiguity could generate legal challenges and make the bill difficult to implement effectively.

Contextual Concerns

The brevity of the amendment, particularly the short addition of "China" as a subparagraph, fails to offer context or detail that would help stakeholders understand the implications or expected outcomes of this legislation. This lack of transparency might hinder informed debate and decision-making among legislators and the public.

Insufficient Information on Amended Section

The bill amends Section 502 of the Trade Act of 1974, but it does not provide information about what this section currently entails. This oversight necessitates additional research for stakeholders to understand the full scope and impact of the amendment, posing a barrier to informed public and legislative engagement.

Potential Impact on the Public

Broadly, the exclusion of China as a beneficiary country may impact the public in several ways. If enacted, the legislation could lead to changes in trade relations between the United States and China. This could alter the availability and cost of goods, potentially affecting consumers and businesses in terms of price and market accessibility.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

Positive Impacts

For U.S. businesses and industries competing with Chinese imports, this bill might have a positive impact by reducing competitive pressures from Chinese goods. By excluding China from certain trade benefits, U.S. companies might gain a more level playing field, potentially fostering domestic economic growth and job creation.

Negative Impacts

Conversely, stakeholders reliant on imports from China could face challenges. This includes retailers and industries that depend on Chinese manufacturing or raw materials. Higher costs or tariffs could trickle down to consumers, affecting household budgets and altering consumption patterns.

Additionally, diplomatic relations with China might be strained, potentially affecting broader geopolitical dynamics and economic cooperation. Such shifts could have indirect implications for various sectors, including technology, agriculture, and finance.

In conclusion, while the bill's intent is to safeguard trade opportunities and prevent anti-competitive practices, its current form raises important questions about clarity, rationale, and broader impacts. Without more detailed context and explanation, the practical effects and ethical considerations of this legislative amendment remain uncertain.

Issues

  • The amendment section (Section 2) provides for the automatic exclusion of China under a specific section of the Trade Act, but it does not explain the rationale for this exclusion. This omission could lead to political and diplomatic tension as the reasoning behind targeting China is not made explicit.

  • The language in Section 2 referencing 'automatic exclusion' is unclear because it does not specify what China is being excluded from. This lack of clarity could result in legal ambiguities and challenges regarding the interpretation and implementation of this amendment.

  • The amendment, which adds a short new subparagraph 'China,' lacks context or detailed explanation of the intended impact or benefits of this change. This brevity may cause misunderstanding or misinterpretation among policymakers and stakeholders, raising ethical concerns about transparency in legislative processes.

  • The bill amends Section 502 of the Trade Act of 1974 but does not explain or provide sufficient information about this section, making it difficult for the public and legislators to fully grasp the implications without further research. This poses a barrier to informed public discourse and legislative scrutiny.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The first section of the act specifies its short title, which is the “Safeguarding Trade Opportunities and Preventing China’s Anti-Competitive Practices Act”.

2. Expansion of automatic exclusion Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section of the Trade Act of 1974 has been updated to automatically exclude China under certain criteria by adding it as an exception in the legislation.