Overview
Title
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to define the term free trade agreement for purposes of the clean vehicle credit.
ELI5 AI
H.R. 7983 is a bill that explains what a "free trade agreement" means when it comes to giving tax credits for clean cars. It says that if the U.S. and another country have an agreement that stops charging extra fees and removes trade barriers, that counts as a free trade deal for cars made after the bill is passed.
Summary AI
H.R. 7983 is a bill introduced in the House of Representatives to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. It defines a "free trade agreement" in the context of clean vehicle credits as an international agreement approved by Congress, which eliminates duties and restrictive trade regulations between the U.S. and other countries. The changes will apply to vehicles placed into service after the enactment of the Act.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
The proposed legislation, identified as H.R. 7983, seeks to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 by defining what constitutes a "free trade agreement" specifically for the purposes of the clean vehicle credit. Introduced in the House of Representatives by Mrs. Fischbach on April 15, 2024, the bill is titled the "Stop Executive Overreach on Trade Agreements." Its primary aim is to clarify the types of international agreements that qualify under the clean vehicle credit provisions, essentially ensuring that these agreements are approved by Congress and aim to eliminate trade barriers between the United States and other countries.
Summary of Significant Issues
A critical issue identified in the bill is the ambiguity in the phrase "substantially all the trade" within Section 2's definition of a free trade agreement. This language could lead to varying interpretations about which agreements qualify. Additionally, the bill's reference to "duties and other restrictive regulations of commerce" lacks precision, potentially resulting in inconsistent application. Moreover, there's an issue regarding the lack of specification on the countries involved in the free trade agreement, which could lead to broad or inconsistent interpretations and applications, potentially causing disputes.
Impact on the Public Broadly
If enacted, this bill could influence the availability and applicability of clean vehicle credits, affecting consumers interested in purchasing environmentally friendly vehicles. By restricting the definition of qualifying free trade agreements to those approved by Congress, the bill could limit the number and types of agreements that meet the criteria, potentially reducing the incentives for purchasing clean vehicles if fewer vehicles qualify for the tax credit. This could slow the adoption of clean vehicle technologies across the general public, depending on how these trade agreements are defined and implemented.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
The impact on specific stakeholders varies. Automobile manufacturers who rely on parts or vehicles imported under certain trade agreements might face increased costs or administrative burdens if those agreements do not meet the new requirements, potentially impacting pricing and availability of vehicles. Meanwhile, environmental advocacy groups might view the restrictive definition as a hindrance to the promotion of clean energy solutions, as fewer incentives could slow the transition to sustainable transportation.
On the other hand, members of Congress who seek greater oversight over trade agreements might view this bill as a positive development. It reinforces Congressional authority, potentially offering a check on executive powers in the negotiation and implementation of trade agreements. Conversely, this could be seen as a negative by parties interested in preserving executive flexibility in foreign trade negotiations.
Overall, while this bill aims to provide clarity, the lack of specific language could lead to legal challenges and impede the goals of promoting clean vehicle technologies in the face of global trade complexities.
Issues
Ambiguity in the term 'substantially all the trade' in Section 2, which may lead to differing interpretations and legal challenges concerning what qualifies as a free trade agreement for clean vehicle credits.
Potential lack of clarity on what constitutes 'duties and other restrictive regulations of commerce' in Section 2, which could result in inconsistent application of the free trade agreement definition.
The provision in Section 2 lacks specificity on what other 'countries' must be involved in the free trade agreement, leading to broad or inconsistent application and potential disputes between the U.S. and other nations.
The text provided in Section 1 is only the short title of the Act and does not contain detailed provisions, which limits the ability to audit for issues related to spending, favoritism, or unclear language.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the act establishes its short title as the “Stop Executive Overreach on Trade Agreements”.
2. Free trade agreement defined for purposes of clean vehicle credit Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section updates the Internal Revenue Code to define a "free trade agreement" as an international agreement approved by Congress that removes trade barriers like duties between the United States and one or more countries, with this amendment affecting vehicles used after the law is enacted.