Overview
Title
To amend title 10, United States Code, to extend parental leave to members of the Coast Guard Reserve.
ELI5 AI
H.R. 7952 aims to allow Coast Guard Reserve members to take time off when they have a new baby, just like people in other branches of the military.
Summary AI
H.R. 7952 is a bill designed to amend title 10 of the United States Code to extend parental leave benefits to members of the Coast Guard Reserve. The bill was introduced in the House of Representatives by Mr. Jackson of North Carolina and Mr. Nunn of Iowa. It aims to provide the same parental leave privileges that are available to members of other military branches, like the Army, Navy, and Air Force, to those serving in the Coast Guard Reserve. The bill also includes a technical correction by redesignating the relevant section of the U.S. Code.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
Overview of the Bill
The proposed legislative bill, titled the "Coast Guard Reserve Parental Leave Parity Act," aims to amend the United States Code to extend parental leave rights to members of the Coast Guard Reserve. This change seeks to align the leave benefits of Coast Guard reservists with those of active-duty members across other branches of the military. The bill, introduced by Mr. Jackson of North Carolina and Mr. Nunn of Iowa, highlights a focus on ensuring equal leave provisions for all service members, regardless of their reserve status.
Significant Issues
One of the key issues with this bill is the lack of detail regarding the financial implications of extending parental leave to Coast Guard reservists. Although the intention behind the amendment is clear, it does not specify how these changes will be funded. This absence of financial clarity could lead to debates about the potential impact on the federal budget or require additional appropriations.
Additionally, the bill removes specific wording from the existing legislation, which may lead to confusion for those not familiar with legislative nuances. By omitting the phrase that specifies the military branches initially included, the amendment might obscure its broader impact, leaving room for uncertainty regarding its full scope.
The bill also proposes a technical change, redesignating a section of the United States Code from 711 to 710a. However, the reason for this redesignation is not explained, which might create confusion among legal professionals and lawmakers who rely on these designations for precise legal references and interpretations.
Impact on the Public
Broadly speaking, the extension of parental leave to Coast Guard reservists might improve work-life balance for service members, positively affecting their families. By aligning reservists' benefits with those of active-duty counterparts, the bill acknowledges the vital roles that reservists play and supports their family commitments. The overall morale and well-being of service members could improve as a result, which might also enhance their readiness and effectiveness in their roles.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Coast Guard Reservists are the primary beneficiaries, potentially enjoying increased leave benefits that might better accommodate the needs of new parents within the service. This change could lead to greater job satisfaction and retention within the Coast Guard Reserve.
From an administrative standpoint, the Coast Guard and affiliated military departments might face the challenge of implementing these leave benefits without clear financial guidelines. They could experience increased administrative burdens or financial strains due to the expanded scope of leave entitlements.
Government budget planners and policymakers may need to address funding mechanisms to support the extended benefits outlined in the bill, ensuring that resources are allocated without negatively impacting other areas.
In conclusion, while the "Coast Guard Reserve Parental Leave Parity Act" could have significant positive implications for service members and their families, further clarity on financial and legislative aspects would be essential to fully understand and evaluate its impact.
Issues
The amendment extends parental leave to members of the Coast Guard Reserve but does not provide details on potential financial implications or funding sources, which could be significant for budget considerations. (Section 2)
The amendment removes a specific phrase from Section 711, which may cause confusion for those unfamiliar with legislative drafting and its implications for different military branches. This lack of clarity can lead to misunderstanding of the bill's intent and scope. (Section 2)
The bill involves a technical correction by redesignating Section 711 as Section 710a, but does not provide an explanation for this change, which could affect legal interpretation and the bill's accessibility to those unfamiliar with the legislative context. (Section 2)
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
This section establishes the short title of the law, which can be referred to as the “Coast Guard Reserve Parental Leave Parity Act.”
2. Extension of parental leave to members of the Coast Guard Reserve Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill extends parental leave benefits to members of the Coast Guard Reserve by amending the relevant section of the United States Code. It also makes a technical correction by redesignating the section as 710a.