Overview
Title
To include reasonable costs for high-speed internet service in the utility allowances for families residing in public housing, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
This bill wants to help families living in public housing get fast internet by including these costs in their utility budget, but only for families with kids who get free or cheap school lunches. It also makes sure that kids have safe internet by requiring filters to block bad stuff online.
Summary AI
H.R. 7948 aims to help families living in public housing by including the costs for high-speed internet in their utility allowances. This bill allows these families to cover expenses like renting or buying necessary equipment and one-time installation fees. The inclusion is limited to the cost of the lowest-priced high-speed internet available in the area and does not cover cable TV or phone services. Additionally, only households with children eligible for free or reduced-price school lunches can benefit, and internet providers must offer a way to block or filter harmful online content for minors.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
Summary of the Bill
The proposed legislation, titled the "Closing the Digital Divide for Students Act of 2024," seeks to amend the United States Housing Act of 1937. Its primary objective is to ensure that families residing in public housing have their high-speed internet costs considered as part of their utility allowances. This includes not just the monthly service fee, but also equipment rental or purchase and a one-time installation cost. The bill, introduced by Mr. Foster along with several co-sponsors, aims to bridge the digital divide faced by students in low-income households, ensuring they have the necessary access to the internet for educational and other essential purposes.
Summary of Significant Issues
Several issues emerge from the bill's provisions. A key concern is the ambiguity surrounding the term "lowest cost available in the area," which may lead to inconsistencies because internet service costs can vary even within small geographic regions. This lack of clarity could affect the fairness of utility allowances.
Another significant issue is that the eligibility requirement restricts the internet allowance to families with children eligible for free or reduced-price lunch, potentially excluding other low-income families without such children who might also benefit from internet access. Additionally, the technology requirements for blocking inappropriate content lack specificity, which could lead to inconsistent levels of protection for minors across different households.
Excluding costs for cable, satellite television, and telephone service from utility allowances might prevent families from accessing more affordable bundled service options. This might exacerbate financial strain for those who could otherwise benefit from such packages. The bill also does not clarify how these changes will be communicated to current residents, leaving room for many to remain unaware of their potential new benefits.
Impact on the Public Broadly
If implemented effectively, this bill could have a broad positive impact by facilitating internet access for many families residing in public housing. The internet is an essential utility in modern times, integral for education, work, healthcare, and communication. By including high-speed internet in utility allowances, the bill could significantly contribute to educational equity, allowing students from low-income households to access online learning resources more readily.
However, the bill's limitations and potential for inconsistency could dilute its effectiveness. If issues around cost determination and eligibility are not resolved, some needy families might be left without the intended support, perpetuating existing inequalities.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Families in Public Housing: The most direct beneficiaries are families in public housing, particularly those with children eligible for free or reduced-price lunch. They stand to gain easier access to affordable internet, which is crucial for educational purposes. However, families without eligible children might miss out on these benefits, despite potentially having similar needs.
Internet Service Providers: The bill mandates that providers offer technology capable of filtering inappropriate content. This might necessitate additional investments or changes for some companies, impacting their operations and profitability.
Educational Institutions: Schools and educators might see improved engagement from students who now have access to consistent internet for remote learning and homework. This could positively impact educational outcomes.
Policy Implementers: Ensuring compliance and effectively communicating the new provisions to residents could present challenges for housing authorities and government agencies involved in policy implementation. This could strain resources if not managed efficiently.
Overall, while the bill aims to address an important issue, its success depends on addressing the highlighted shortcomings and ensuring effective communication and implementation strategies.
Issues
The lack of a clear definition for 'lowest cost available in the area' in Section 2 may lead to ambiguity and inconsistencies, as internet service costs can vary even within small geographic areas. This could impact the cost assessment and fairness of utility allowances for residents.
The eligibility requirement in Section 2 that only families with children who qualify for free or reduced-price lunch can have internet costs included in their utility allowance may unfairly exclude other low-income families without such qualifying children, potentially denying them access to essential internet services.
The provision in Section 2 requiring internet service providers to offer 'a specific technology capable of blocking or filtering internet access' lacks specifics on what constitutes an adequate technology, potentially leading to uneven protection measures for minors and challenges in enforcement.
Excluding costs for cable or satellite television and telephone services in the utility allowance, as stated in Section 2, could limit households' access to more affordable bundled service options that could save money overall, raising financial concerns for residents.
There is no explicit provision in Section 2 on how the changes to utility allowances will be communicated to existing public housing residents. This can lead to residents being unaware and possibly uninformed about their eligibility and the process to obtain high-speed internet service, affecting the efficacy of the initiative.
Implementing and enforcing compliance with filtering requirements for minors' protection, as outlined in Section 2, may pose significant complexities, leading to potential loopholes in safeguarding minors from inappropriate content.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the Act specifies its short title, which is “Closing the Digital Divide for Students Act of 2024.”
2. Inclusion of high-speed internet service in public housing utility allowances for certain families Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
In the proposed amendment to the United States Housing Act of 1937, it is stated that utility allowances for public housing should cover the costs of high-speed internet, including necessary equipment and installation, within certain limits. These limits include not exceeding the area's lowest available monthly internet cost and ensuring that families with children who qualify for free or reduced-price lunch are protected with technology to block inappropriate content online.