Overview
Title
To require the Administrator of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration to establish a Climate Change Education Program, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
H.R. 7946 is like a plan to help people learn about Earth's changing weather through fun and interesting lessons, and it has a big piggy bank of $50 million each year to make sure schools and groups can teach lots of people about new things and jobs that can help take care of our planet.
Summary AI
H. R. 7946 requires the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) to set up a Climate Change Education Program. This program aims to increase understanding of climate change by offering learning opportunities for people of all ages, highlighting new technologies and job opportunities related to climate adaptation and justice. Grants will be given to schools, colleges, and organizations to develop climate education projects, with a focus on involving communities and promoting equitable outcomes. The bill authorizes $50 million in funding annually from 2025 to 2030 to support these initiatives.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
This legislative proposal, known as the "Climate Change Education Act," aims to mandate the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) to create a comprehensive Climate Change Education Program. The purpose of this program is to enhance climate literacy across the United States by educating people through formal and informal learning channels. The bill sets out specific guidelines for administering grants and cooperative agreements to various educational institutions and organizations to support climate education. The bill also envisions equitable educational initiatives that address climate justice issues across diverse communities. The allocated budget for these activities is set at $50 million annually, from 2025 through 2030.
Summary of Significant Issues
A critical concern is the bill's allocation of $50 million per year over six years without clearly outlining how these funds are to be spent. This approach raises concerns about potential waste and lack of accountability. Furthermore, the bill presents broad definitions of terms like "climate change education" and "climate justice," which might lead to varied interpretations and inconsistencies in implementation. Another noteworthy issue lies in the grant distribution clauses, which use fixed percentages that might not adapt well to changing needs or priorities. Additionally, excluding local educational agencies from receiving grants when the overall funding is below a certain threshold could limit educational initiatives in smaller communities.
Potential Impact on the Public
Broadly speaking, the bill could foster a more informed public on climate issues by promoting education and awareness, potentially leading to more environmentally cautious behaviors. This educational push could also translate into better community resilience against climate change impacts. However, if the funds are not effectively managed, there is a risk of public dissatisfaction due to perceived fiscal waste and inefficiency.
Moreover, the wide span of educational topics included under "climate change education" may lead to confusion or mixed effectiveness if educators lack clear guidance on standardized curricula and definitions.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Educational institutions, especially those involved in STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics), may benefit significantly if the grant distribution is well-managed, as this would provide resources for curriculum development and enhancement. However, smaller institutions might face challenges in accessing these funds promptly if they are disadvantaged by funding structures favoring larger institutions.
Students may see a direct benefit, emerging with actionable knowledge and skills to engage with climate-related challenges and opportunities professionally and personally. Yet, the lack of a precise program evaluation framework might affect the program's quality and its true educational impact.
Stakeholders involved in environmental and climate justice might appreciate the bill's attention to equitable treatment and community involvement, although the present lack of detailed implementation strategies could create challenges in realizing these goals effectively.
Overall, while this bill presents an ambitious vision for integrating climate education into the nation’s learning systems, clear execution plans and flexible funding allocation are pivotal to truly harness its potential benefits.
Financial Assessment
The financial aspects of H.R. 7946 introduce a framework to fund climate change education through several measures, primarily focusing on grant allocations, and cooperative agreements, with a significant commitment to funding. This commentary will outline how money is being appropriated and the potential implications based on the identified issues.
Funding Authorization
The bill authorizes $50 million annually for fiscal years 2025 through 2030 to implement the Climate Change Education Program. This substantial amount of funding indicates a pronounced commitment to addressing climate change education nationwide. However, there is concern that the legislation does not provide detailed oversight or specific purposes, which could lead to potential wasteful spending. This lack of detailed fiscal accountability raises questions about transparency and the effective use of these funds.
Grants and Cooperative Agreements
Notably, the bill specifies how these appropriated funds should be distributed through grants and cooperative agreements. The allocation percentages are as follows: - 50% for grants to state and local educational agencies and nonprofit organizations. - 30% for institutions of higher education and related networks. - 10% for professional associations. - 10% for youth corps organizations.
These fixed percentages could potentially hinder flexible responses to changing priorities or needs within the educational sector. As the needs of climate education might fluctuate, a rigid allocation might not be suitable to address emerging or high-priority areas effectively.
Limitations for Local Educational Agencies
The bill includes a stipulation that prohibits grants or cooperative agreements to local educational agencies unless the annual appropriation exceeds $5 million. This condition could disadvantage smaller educational bodies, particularly in underfunded areas, by limiting their access to financial resources essential for climate change education initiatives. This limitation may unintentionally create disparities in educational access and opportunities.
Minimum Grant Amounts
The legislation also ensures that if appropriations exceed $5 million in any fiscal year, any grant or cooperative agreement awarded is required to provide a minimum of $1 million. Such a minimum is provisioned to substantiate the funding impact, although it might bias favor toward larger, well-resourced institutions, thereby perpetuating an imbalance in opportunity and resource distribution across varied educational entities.
Environmental Justice Consideration
In terms of targeting disadvantaged communities, the bill mandates that 40% of funds allocated for specific grants and agreements go toward environmental justice communities. This initiative aims to foster equitable outcomes but may also require careful management and oversight to ensure that the intent behind these financial directives is fully realized.
In conclusion, while H.R. 7946 prescribes a generous fiscal plan intended to enhance climate literacy and education, it presents some challenges regarding financial accountability, equitable distribution, and adaptive funding mechanisms. Addressing these challenges will be essential in ensuring that the allocated funds effectively serve the intended purpose of comprehensive climate change education.
Issues
The authorization of $50,000,000 annually for six years without detailed purpose or oversight measures, in Section 7, could lead to potential wasteful spending and lacks transparency regarding the effective use of these funds.
The definition of 'climate change education' and associated terms in Section 3 includes broad subjects like climate justice, which might result in varying interpretations and inconsistent implementation across educational and governmental entities.
The lack of specific metrics or methods for evaluating the effectiveness of the Climate Change Education Program in Section 4 could lead to inefficiencies or unclear measurement of success.
The exclusion of local educational agencies when appropriations do not exceed $5,000,000 in Section 5 might limit the ability of these agencies to engage in climate change education initiatives, potentially disadvantaging smaller communities.
The section on Grants and cooperative agreements in Section 5 uses fixed percentages for fund allocation, which might prevent flexible response to evolving needs or higher priority areas, thus impacting the effectiveness of fund distribution.
The bill in Section 2 makes broad claims about public support and educational needs without specific citations or data references, which might undermine the perceived imperative or urgency of legislative action.
The potential favoring of larger universities in grant allocations as suggested in Section 5 could disadvantage smaller or less-resourced institutions, leading to inequitable access to resources and opportunities.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the bill states that it can be called the “Climate Change Education Act.”
2. Findings Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Congress's findings emphasize the undeniable evidence of human-caused climate change, the importance of renewable energy, and energy efficiency, and highlight the need for climate education. They note widespread public support for climate education, the role of NOAA in environmental learning, and suggest expanding NOAA's Environmental Literacy Program to better include climate education for teachers and students.
3. Definitions Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
In this section, the bill defines terms like "climate change education," "climate justice," "green economy," and "environmental justice," among others. It details how these terms relate to learning, fairness, community impact, economic well-being, and specific entities like nonprofit organizations and educational agencies.
4. Climate Change Education Program Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill requires the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration to set up a Climate Change Education Program within a year of the bill's enactment. This program aims to enhance climate literacy by using the latest scientific and technological discoveries to provide educational opportunities, focus on actionable climate information, and involve people from diverse backgrounds.
5. Grants and cooperative agreements Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines a new program by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration to provide grants and cooperative agreements to various educational and professional organizations for climate change education initiatives. It specifies how funds are to be allocated, prioritizing state and local education agencies, higher education institutions, professional associations, and youth organizations, with particular emphasis on supporting environmental justice communities and requiring minimum funding levels when appropriations exceed a certain amount.
Money References
- Climate Change Education Program shall establish communities of practice with respect to each of paragraphs (1) through (4) of subsection (a) in order to accelerate learning. (c) Local educational agencies.—The Administrator of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration may not award a grant to, or establish a cooperative agreement with, a local educational agency in any fiscal year under paragraph (1) of subsection (a) unless amounts appropriated for grants and cooperative agreements under such subsection for that fiscal year exceed $5,000,000. (d) Allocation of amounts.
- — (1) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in paragraph (2), amounts appropriated for grants and cooperative agreements under subsection (a) shall be allocated as follows: (A) 50 percent for grants and cooperative agreements under paragraph (1) of such subsection. (B) 30 percent for grants and cooperative agreements under paragraph (2) of such subsection. (C) 10 percent for grants and cooperative agreements under paragraph (3) of such subsection. (D) 10 percent for grants and cooperative agreements under paragraph (4) of such subsection. (2) EXCEPTION.—If amounts appropriated for grants and cooperative agreements under subsection (a) do not exceed $5,000,000 in any fiscal year, the Administrator of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration may use in that fiscal year— (A) 60 percent of such amounts for grants and cooperative agreements under paragraph (1) of such subsection; and (B) 40 percent of such amounts for grants and cooperative agreements under paragraph (2) of such subsection.
- (e) Grant and cooperative agreement minimum.—If amounts appropriated for grants and cooperative agreements under subsection (a) exceed $5,000,000 in any fiscal year, any grant awarded to, or cooperative agreement established with, an entity under paragraph (1) of such subsection shall provide the entity a minimum of $1,000,000 in that fiscal year.
6. Annual report Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Administrator of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration is required to submit a report to Congress every year, starting two years after the law is enacted. This report must evaluate the scientific benefits, educational impact, and overall effects of the activities under this law.
7. Authorization of appropriations Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section authorizes the U.S. government to allocate $50 million each year from 2025 to 2030 to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration to support the activities outlined in this Act.
Money References
- There is authorized to be appropriated to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration to carry out this Act $50,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2025 through 2030.