Overview

Title

To terminate the authorities of certain entities of the Federal Government, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

H. R. 7937 is a bill that wants to stop some government offices from working on ideas like fairness, diversity, and making sure everyone is included, by closing them down and not letting others make plans about these things.

Summary AI

H. R. 7937, also known as the "Diversity Equity Inclusion Dead On Arrival Act of 2024" or "DEI DOA Act," is a proposed law that seeks to terminate the authority of various federal offices focused on diversity, equity, and inclusion. This bill lists multiple government entities, such as the Office of Diversity in departments like State and Treasury, that will be abolished, and prohibits cabinet-level agencies from implementing any diversity-related plans. Additionally, it restricts the United States Agency for International Development from enforcing its Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Strategy.

Published

2024-04-11
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Introduced in House
Date: 2024-04-11
Package ID: BILLS-118hr7937ih

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
2
Words:
1,072
Pages:
6
Sentences:
34

Language

Nouns: 419
Verbs: 15
Adjectives: 6
Adverbs: 0
Numbers: 47
Entities: 116

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.29
Average Sentence Length:
31.53
Token Entropy:
4.30
Readability (ARI):
17.82

AnalysisAI

General Summary of the Bill

H.R. 7937, introduced in the 118th Congress, is titled the "Diversity Equity Inclusion Dead On Arrival Act of 2024", also known as the "DEI DOA Act." This bill aims to eliminate the authorities of several government offices that focus on diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) within various federal agencies. It also seeks to prohibit the implementation of DEI-related plans by the heads of cabinet-level agencies and specifically restricts the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) from utilizing its DEI strategy.

Summary of Significant Issues

The bill raises several crucial issues:

  1. Broad Termination of DEI Offices: The bill proposes terminating the authorities of a wide array of federal offices that handle DEI and civil rights matters. This sweeping action could significantly impact how these values are addressed within the federal government.

  2. Prohibition on DEI Strategies: It explicitly prevents cabinet-level agency heads and the USAID Administrator from carrying out any DEI-related strategies, raising concerns about the potential stifling of inclusivity efforts.

  3. Ambiguity in Coverage: The language defining "covered agency" is somewhat vague, which might lead to misunderstandings regarding which agencies are affected.

  4. Lack of Replacement Measures: The bill does not propose any alternative structures or strategies to take over the functions of the eliminated offices, potentially leaving a gap in efforts to promote DEI values.

Impact on the Public

For the general public, the bill's enactment might signify a shift in how diversity, equity, and inclusion are prioritized at the federal level. If DEI-related offices and strategies are dismantled, it could influence the cultural landscape of government workplaces by potentially reducing focus on promoting inclusivity and addressing inequalities. It may also affect public perception of the government's commitment to these values, possibly leading to political and social debates.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

Federal Employees and Agencies: Employees who work within the affected DEI offices or are involved in related programs might face uncertainty regarding job security and the continuation of their initiatives. The impact could extend to broader workforce morale and inclusivity within federal agencies.

Advocates for DEI: Organizations and individuals advocating for DEI might view this legislation as a significant setback, leading to mobilization efforts to counter its effects. The absence of specific DEI offices could hinder ongoing efforts to address systemic inequalities.

International Relations: Given that USAID's DEI strategy is explicitly mentioned, there might be international implications. Restricting DEI efforts in international development could affect the U.S.'s standing on global initiatives that aim to promote equality and justice, potentially complicating diplomatic relations and commitments.

The legislation seems poised to spark considerable debate on the role of DEI in government and society, weighing the importance of these values against the bill's stated objectives.

Issues

  • The termination of the authorities of numerous offices related to diversity, equity, inclusion, and civil rights might be seen as a broad and sweeping action without clear justification or consideration of the potential consequences on existing programs and initiatives, which could affect organizational inclusivity and culture across multiple federal agencies. (Section 2(b))

  • The lack of clarity or detail on what measures, if any, would replace the functions of the offices being terminated may leave a gap in addressing issues related to diversity, equity, inclusion, and civil rights, raising concerns about the government's commitment to these values. (Section 2(b))

  • The prohibition on carrying out plans related to diversity, equity, and inclusion at cabinet-level agencies might raise concerns about potential negative impacts on organizational culture and inclusivity goals, potentially generating significant political and ethical debate. (Section 2(c)(1))

  • The prohibition on the USAID Administrator regarding the Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Strategy could be seen as undermining efforts to promote these principles in international development initiatives, potentially impacting foreign relations and international commitments to these values. (Section 2(c)(2))

  • The ambiguous language used in defining 'covered agency' as 'an agency, the head of which is within the President's cabinet' might lead to confusion over which specific agencies are included, complicating the bill's implementation. (Section 2(a))

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The first section of the bill gives it a formal name, stating that it can be referred to as the “Diversity Equity Inclusion Dead On Arrival Act of 2024” or simply the “DEI DOA Act”.

2. Termination of authority Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

In this section, a list of specific government offices related to diversity and inclusion are to be terminated immediately upon enactment of the act. Additionally, it prohibits the heads of major cabinet-level agencies and the Administrator of USAID from implementing plans or strategies related to diversity, equity, and inclusion.