Overview
Title
To provide for the standardization, publication, and accessibility of data relating to public outdoor recreational use of Federal waterways, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
H.R. 7925 is a plan to make maps and information about where people can play and fish on rivers and lakes easier to find online. It wants different groups to work together so everyone can easily see which parts of the water to visit.
Summary AI
H.R. 7925 aims to make it easier for people to find and use information about outdoor recreational activities on U.S. federal waterways. The bill requires the Secretary of Commerce to standardize, publish, and regularly update geospatial data on waterway restrictions and fishing areas. This data will be made available on a publicly accessible website and will be designed to be easy to find and use. The bill also allows for partnerships with state agencies and other organizations to help collect and share this information.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
The proposed legislation, titled the "Modernizing Access to Our Public Oceans Act," seeks to enhance the way data is standardized, published, and made accessible regarding public outdoor recreational use of federal waterways. The bill requires the Secretary of Commerce, in cooperation with stakeholders, to create standards for collecting and disseminating geospatial data. This includes making such information available through a publicly accessible website, indicating areas of federal waterways that are subject to specific restrictions or conditions. Furthermore, the act emphasizes cooperation and coordination with various partners, including non-Federal entities and experts, to ensure efficient execution.
Summary of Significant Issues
Several notable issues emerge from the proposed legislation:
Ambiguity in Terms and Implementation: The bill frequently uses ambiguous phrases such as "to the maximum extent practicable," potentially leading to subjective enforcement standards and compliance challenges.
Timeline Concerns: The 30-month timeline for developing and adopting data standards may be perceived as lengthy, which could delay the benefits and improvements intended by the bill.
Oversight and Accountability: There is a notable absence of oversight or review mechanisms to ensure the data's accuracy and integrity on public platforms. Furthermore, no clear accountability measures are detailed concerning agreements with third-party providers.
Financial Uncertainty: The bill lacks a thorough examination of the potential financial impact, which might result in budgetary strain due to unclear resource allocation for website development, data updates, and technological requirements for real-time data integration.
Stakeholder Involvement and Representation: The bill does not outline specific criteria for the inclusion of stakeholders, which might lead to unequal representation or favoritism in the decision-making process.
Impact on the Public
Broadly speaking, the public would benefit from the increased accessibility and transparency of data regarding the use of federal waterways. By providing easily accessible navigation, fishing, and waterway restriction data online, recreational users can better plan activities and comply with regulations. However, the ambiguity in enforcement could lead to inconsistency in data availability and reliability, potentially reducing user trust.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Government Agencies: Federal, state, and tribal agencies could face challenges in the coordination and integration of data standards, especially given the requirement for real-time updates.
Data and Technology Experts: These stakeholders might find opportunities in partnerships and consultations during the implementation phase. Nonetheless, lack of specificity in selection criteria could lead to unbalanced representations.
Public and Recreational Users: The public stands to gain from improved access to waterway data, enhancing recreational experiences and compliance with existing regulations. However, the effectiveness of these benefits relies heavily on the timely and accurate implementation of the proposed data systems.
Non-Federal Entities: Groups such as non-profit organizations and private tech firms may be seen as valuable collaborators, yet issues around transparency and fairness in partnerships could arise if selection criteria are not clearly defined.
To conclude, while the bill aims to modernize the access to and management of federal waterway data, the lack of specific details and accountability could undermine its objectives, impacting both the public and stakeholders in varying ways. Addressing these issues in revisions could significantly enhance the bill's efficacy and acceptance.
Issues
The provisions regarding data publication and accessibility in Section 4 use the phrase 'to the maximum extent practicable,' which may lead to ambiguity in enforcement and compliance due to its subjective interpretation.
Section 4 does not specify any oversight or review mechanism to ensure that the data on the publicly accessible website is accurate, complete, and regularly updated, potentially leading to data integrity issues.
The timeline for developing and adopting standards in Section 3 is set at 30 months, which may be considered lengthy and could delay important data standardization efforts.
Section 4 lacks a clear indication of budgetary implications or cost analysis for developing and maintaining the website and data updates, which might result in overspending or misallocation of resources.
The section pertaining to nondisclosure of certain information (Section 4, subsection (f)) provides limited guidance on enforcement and applicable laws, raising potential privacy and data protection concerns.
Section 5 does not mention oversight or accountability mechanisms for agreements with third-party providers, potentially resulting in a lack of transparency and misuse of resources.
The language regarding stakeholder consultation in Section 3 is vague, which could lead to difficulties in reaching consensus and questions about inclusivity and representation.
The requirement for real-time updates of certain datasets in Section 4 could be technologically challenging and costly, with feasibility not addressed.
Section 5 uses broad terms like 'experts in data science, analytics, and operations research' without specific qualifications, risking the inclusion of underqualified or biased parties.
Section 6 leaves 'Federal or State agencies' undefined, causing potential confusion about which agencies are affected by the bill's provisions.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the act states that it may be referred to as the “Modernizing Access to Our Public Oceans Act.”
2. Definitions Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
This section of the bill provides definitions for important terms. It explains what a "Federal fishing restriction area" is, defines "Federal waterway" and "Federal waterway restriction," and clarifies that the "Secretary" refers to the Secretary of Commerce.
3. Data standardization Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Secretary must create and adopt rules, in collaboration with relevant parties, within 30 months from the law's passage to standardize how geospatial data about public recreational use of federal waterways and fishing restriction areas is collected and shared.
4. Data publication and accessibility Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section mandates that the Secretary make federal waterway fishing access and navigation data available online within four years, ensuring this data is easy to find, use, and update. It includes restrictions on waterways and fishing areas, with mechanisms for public feedback, regular updates, and safeguards against disclosing sensitive information.
5. Cooperation and coordination Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Secretary can work with non-Federal partners and experts in various fields to implement this Act and may enter agreements to help carry out its provisions. The Secretary should also collaborate with other Federal agencies to ensure data compatibility and must clarify that the geospatial data developed is subject to relevant Federal, State, and Tribal regulations.
6. Rule of construction Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section makes it clear that this Act does not change the definition of "navigable waters" in any federal laws, affect the authority of federal or state agencies to regulate these waters, or alter the responsibilities of these agencies to manage fisheries.