Overview
Title
To require the Secretary of the Interior to finalize a proposed rule to remove the Apache trout from the Federal List of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife.
ELI5 AI
The bill asks for a decision to be made quickly about taking the Apache trout off of the endangered species list, which means it might not need special help anymore. Some people are not sure if this is a good idea because they want to make sure the fish will be okay in the future.
Summary AI
H.R. 7897 requires the Secretary of the Interior to complete the process of removing the Apache trout from the federal list of endangered and threatened wildlife. This bill mandates that the final rule to delist the Apache trout be issued no later than 90 days after the bill becomes law. The proposed rule for delisting was initially published in August 2023.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
H.R. 7897: An Overview and Examination
The U.S. Congress is considering a bill, H.R. 7897, aimed at removing the Apache trout from the Federal List of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife. This legislation proposes that the Secretary of the Interior, through the Director of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, finalize a rule within 90 days to delist this particular fish species, based on a previous proposal made in August 2023.
Summary of Significant Issues
Several issues arise from the bill in its current form. First and foremost, the bill does not provide explicit justification for removing the Apache trout from the endangered list. This omission could raise questions about the adequacy and reliability of data supporting such a decision and whether delisting might negatively impact biodiversity in the trout's natural habitats.
There is also a lack of clarity regarding the measures to be taken if the species' status either improves or worsens post-delisting. The bill does not specify subsequent actions or consequences, such as the process for potentially re-listing the species if it faces threats again or ensuring adequate protection.
Furthermore, the bill does not mention any follow-up or monitoring plans to ensure that the Apache trout population remains stable after its removal from the list. This absence may lead to concerns among environmentalists and conservationists who emphasize the importance of ongoing monitoring to sustain the species' populations.
Lastly, financial implications of the bill are unclear. There is no discussion regarding possible funding for continued conservation efforts if necessary. This oversight might result in budgetary challenges should additional conservation measures be required after delisting.
Public Impact
The proposed delisting of the Apache trout from the endangered species list can have broad public implications. On one hand, it might be seen as a positive step by those who argue it recognizes successful conservation efforts and indicates the recovery of the species. Such a move could potentially redirect resources to species still facing critical threats.
On the other hand, removing the Apache trout from the list without clear, communicated reasons might erode public trust in wildlife management authorities and lead to increased scrutiny over how species' endangerment statuses are assessed.
Impact on Stakeholders
Specific stakeholders, such as environmentalists, conservation groups, and local communities, might be directly affected by this bill. Conservation organizations may view the bill skeptically, particularly if they believe that delisting is premature and could threaten the Apache trout's survival. They may argue for more comprehensive monitoring and conservation measures to accompany any delisting.
Local communities that depend on the natural ecosystem for tourism or fisheries may either support or oppose the bill depending on how they perceive its impact on their economic or environmental interests. For some, delisting might signal a revival of natural habitats, whereas others might worry about the resilience of these ecosystems without continued federal protection.
In conclusion, while H.R. 7897 initiates a significant change in the protection status of the Apache trout, the bill could benefit from additional transparency, justification, and planning to ensure the continued preservation of wildlife and to address potential financial and ecological challenges.
Issues
The section does not clearly justify the removal of the Apache trout from the list of endangered and threatened wildlife, which may raise concerns about the adequacy of assessment data or the potential impact on biodiversity. (Section 1)
There is no explanation of the consequences or subsequent actions if the species' status improves or worsens after removal from the list, leaving uncertainty about the procedure to re-list the species or provide additional protection if needed. (Section 1)
The section lacks any mention of follow-up measures or monitoring plans, raising concerns about whether there will be adequate environmental oversight to ensure the species remains stable after its removal from the list. (Section 1)
The bill does not clarify whether financial implications are considered, such as funding for ongoing conservation efforts if needed after delisting, which could have budgetary consequences. (Section 1)
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Finalization of proposed rule to remove Apache trout from Federal List of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section requires the Secretary of the Interior to finalize a rule within 90 days of the law's enactment, which would remove the Apache trout from the list of endangered and threatened wildlife. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service is responsible for making this change, based on a proposal published in August 2023.