Overview

Title

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 306 Pickens Street in Marion, Alabama, as the Albert Turner, Sr. Post Office Building.

ELI5 AI

The bill wants to give a special name, "Albert Turner, Sr. Post Office Building," to a post office in Alabama, which means when people talk about it, on maps and in rules, they will use this new name.

Summary AI

H.R. 7893 is a bill introduced in the House of Representatives that proposes naming the United States Postal Service facility at 306 Pickens Street in Marion, Alabama, as the "Albert Turner, Sr. Post Office Building." The bill mandates that this name be used in all official references, including laws, maps, regulations, and documents. The bill was introduced by Ms. Sewell and other representatives and has been referred to the Committee on Oversight and Accountability for further action.

Published

2024-04-09
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Introduced in House
Date: 2024-04-09
Package ID: BILLS-118hr7893ih

Keywords AI

albert turner sr. post office designation marion alabama h.r. 7893 usps facility renaming committee on oversight and accountability 118th congress postal service legislation administrative costs legislative bill

Sources

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
1
Words:
273
Pages:
2
Sentences:
11

Language

Nouns: 114
Verbs: 13
Adjectives: 3
Adverbs: 0
Numbers: 7
Entities: 33

Complexity

Average Token Length:
3.94
Average Sentence Length:
24.82
Token Entropy:
4.21
Readability (ARI):
12.73

AnalysisAI

General Summary of the Bill

H.R. 7893 is a straightforward legislative proposal introduced in the House of Representatives. Its primary aim is to name the United States Postal Service facility located at 306 Pickens Street in Marion, Alabama, as the "Albert Turner, Sr. Post Office Building." This designation process involves officially changing the name used in all pertinent federal records and references to reflect the new title.

Significant Issues

While the bill's intention seems clear-cut, there are several significant issues to consider:

  1. Lack of Context: The text of the bill does not provide any background information on who Albert Turner, Sr. is or his contributions that merit this honor. Understanding his significance is crucial, as it justifies why a government facility should be named after him. Without this context, there could be perceptions of favoritism or bias.

  2. Administrative and Financial Implications: Although the renaming does not entail direct fiscal spending, there may be indirect administrative costs. These could include expenses related to changing signage, maps, and updating various official documents. The bill does not address these potential expenses or logistical adjustments.

  3. Automatic Reference Updates: The bill assumes that all federal documents and records will automatically update to reflect the new name. This is a complex process and could involve considerable administrative effort to ensure each reference is correctly updated.

Impact on the Public

For the general public, the renaming of a postal facility might have limited direct impact. Most residents and users of the facility will likely only notice change in the building's name. However, such designations can strengthen community ties by honoring local figures or leaders, potentially fostering a sense of pride among residents.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

Positive Impacts

  • Community Recognition: If Albert Turner, Sr. is a respected figure within the community, this designation could be of symbolic significance, acknowledging his impact or contributions. It could serve as a long-standing tribute that educates and reminds future generations about local history and significant figures.

Negative Impacts

  • Perceptions of Favoritism: Without adequate context or justification in the legislative text, there might be concerns about favoritism. Those not aware of Albert Turner, Sr.'s legacy might question why he was chosen, which could lead to unease or opposition if stakeholders feel another individual may have deserved the honor more.

Overall, while the bill seems minor in scope, it underscores the importance of transparency and communication when assigning honorary designations to public properties. It also highlights the need for careful consideration of the logistical challenges and costs associated with such changes, even when they appear symbolic.

Issues

  • The designation of a postal facility after Albert Turner, Sr. could be perceived as favoritism unless there is a clear understanding of his significance or contributions warranting such an honor. It is important to provide context on who Albert Turner, Sr. is, which the bill currently lacks. [Section 1]

  • The absence of any immediate fiscal impact analysis means the bill does not account for indirect administrative costs related to updating signage, maps, and official documents as a result of the renaming. [Section 1]

  • The assumption that all references to the facility in various federal records will automatically update could lead to administrative challenges, requiring effort and verification. [Section 1]

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Albert Turner, Sr. Post Office Building Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section designates the United States Postal Service facility at 306 Pickens Street, Marion, Alabama, as the "Albert Turner, Sr. Post Office Building." It also states that any legal or official references to this location should use its new name.