Overview
Title
To require the Administrator of the Small Business Administration to issue rules for cancelled covered solicitations, to amend the Small Business Act to provide assistance to small business concerns relating to certain cancelled solicitations, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
H.R. 789 is a plan that helps small businesses by making sure they know why certain big projects they want to work on get canceled, and helps them find other similar projects to join. It makes the rules clear so everyone can see why projects stop and what happens next.
Summary AI
H.R. 789, titled the "Transparency and Predictability in Small Business Opportunities Act," requires the Small Business Administration to create rules for handling "covered solicitations" that are issued and later canceled. The bill mandates that information about why a solicitation was canceled, plans for reissuance, and any potential inclusion in other contracts be made publicly available. Additionally, if a canceled solicitation is not being reissued, small businesses that bid on it must be referred to the Director of Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization for assistance in finding similar opportunities. This legislation aims to improve transparency and support for small businesses affected by the cancellation of federal solicitations.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
H. R. 789, introduced in the 119th Congress, aims to enhance transparency and predictability for small business opportunities in federal contracting. It mandates the Small Business Administration (SBA) to establish rules for scenarios where government contract solicitations, which small businesses could have bid on, are cancelled. The bill requires federal agencies to provide justifications for cancellations, information on potential reissuance, and guidance on whether solicitation requirements might be included in other contracts. Additionally, it mandates assistance for small businesses to find similar opportunities when their prepared bids are on contracts that won't be reissued. Importantly, the bill states that no new funds can be earmarked for its implementation.
Summary of Significant Issues
Several notable issues arise in the bill's implementation:
Transparency and Detail: There is a lack of guidance concerning what constitutes an adequate justification for solicitation cancellations and the level of detail required in the information about reissuance plans.
Complexity and Consistency: The procedures for referring small businesses for assistance in finding new opportunities lack clarity, potentially leading to inconsistent applications.
Financial and Resource Implications: The bill does not authorize new funding, which could hinder its effective enforcement. Additionally, the term "CUTGO" is not clarified, potentially causing confusion regarding financial compliance.
Potential Inequities and Oversight: There are concerns about possible favoritism and the absence of oversight mechanisms to assess the fairness and effectiveness of assistance provided to small businesses.
Impact on the Public
The bill could positively impact small businesses by fostering greater transparency and offering them second chances to engage with government contracts. If federal agencies must disclose reasons for canceling solicitations and possible reissuance plans, small businesses might better plan their resources and strategies. Public access to this information could also help enhance accountability within federal agencies.
Moreover, small businesses may benefit from the assistance they receive in identifying new contracting opportunities, potentially increasing their chances of securing federal contracts. This aspect of the bill could stimulate economic activity by offering small businesses more stability and predictability in their dealings with the government.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Small Businesses
Small businesses stand to gain the most from this bill. By identifying new contracting opportunities swiftly, they can reduce the potential waste of resources put into preparing bids for canceled solicitations. However, if the lack of detail in rules and referral procedures leads to inconsistent implementation, some businesses could face disadvantages.
Federal Agencies
Federal agencies might experience an increased administrative burden when required to explain cancellations and future contract plans. This could lead to staff needing additional time and resources to comply with new transparency standards, especially with no accompanying additional funding.
Small and Disadvantaged Business Offices
Offices of Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization would play a critical role in supporting small businesses. They need clear guidelines to provide effective assistance without favoritism and consistent work practices.
In conclusion, while the Transparency and Predictability in Small Business Opportunities Act presents opportunities to improve the climate for small businesses in federal contracting, its success heavily relies on addressing concerns about detail, implementation consistency, and resource allocation.
Issues
The requirement to make information publicly accessible on the Government-wide point of entry (Section 2) may have privacy implications and should ensure that sensitive information is protected.
There is no requirement or guidance on the level of detail or format of the 'available information' about plans to reissue solicitations, which could result in either insufficient or overwhelming information being provided (Section 2).
The term 'CUTGO' is not defined within Section 4 or associated text, which could lead to ambiguity about compliance requirements.
The text does not clearly define what constitutes a 'justification for cancellation,' which may lead to inconsistencies in implementation across different Federal agencies (Section 2).
The section does not specify any appropriation, which could limit the ability to implement or enforce the Act effectively (Section 4).
The timeline for the Administrator to issue rules (180 days) may not provide sufficient time for a thorough consultation with all stakeholders involved (Section 2).
The phrase 'any plans to include the requirements of such covered solicitation in another contract or task order' is vague and might not capture all relevant updates or changes that could occur (Section 2).
The amendment does not address potential conflicts of interest that might arise if the Office of Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization favors certain small businesses over others when assisting them (Section 3).
There is no mention of oversight or evaluation mechanisms to ensure that the assistance provided to small businesses is effective and equitable (Section 3).
The procedure for referring a small business concern to the Director of Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization could be complex, especially if there are no clear steps or guidance provided on how this should occur (Section 2).
The impact of the provision on existing funding and resources is not discussed, leaving potential gaps in understanding how the Act will be supported financially (Section 4).
The section does not specify the criteria for 'similar contracting opportunities,' which could lead to ambiguity in how assistance is provided to small business concerns (Section 3).
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section 1. Short title in the Transparency and Predictability in Small Business Opportunities Act states that this law can be referred to by its given short title.
2. Small Business Administration rules for cancelled covered solicitations Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Small Business Administration must create rules within 180 days that require sharing information about cancelled government solicitations, including reasons for cancellation, reissuance plans, and alternatives for small businesses. This information must be publicly accessible, and if a solicitation is not set to be reissued, small businesses should be referred for help to find similar opportunities.
3. Duties for Directors of Offices of Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization relating to certain cancelled solicitations Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section amends the Small Business Act to require that when a small business reports that a government agency has canceled a contract opportunity they prepared a bid for, and if the agency doesn't plan to offer it again, officials must help the business find similar opportunities.
4. Compliance with CUTGO Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
This section states that no additional funds can be approved for allocation to implement this Act or its amendments.