Overview
Title
An Act To limit donations made pursuant to settlement agreements to which the United States is a party, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
The "Stop Settlement Slush Funds Act of 2023" is a rule that says when the government solves a problem, they can't make deals that give money to people who aren't involved, unless it's to fix the problem. They have to keep track of these deals and check every year to make sure they're following the rules, but they can't get extra money to do this.
Summary AI
H.R. 788, known as the “Stop Settlement Slush Funds Act of 2023,” aims to restrict federal officials from including provisions in settlement agreements that require payments to third parties unless the payments directly address the harm caused. The bill mandates annual reports from federal agencies about these settlements and requires an annual audit by the agency's Inspector General to ensure compliance. These provisions will remain in effect for seven years after the bill's enactment. Additionally, no extra funds will be allocated to implement these reporting and audit requirements.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
The bill, referred to as the "Stop Settlement Slush Funds Act of 2023," seeks to impose restrictions on how settlement agreements involving the United States government can direct payments. Specifically, it prohibits government officials from creating settlement agreements that require payments to any outside entity unless it directly addresses harm caused by the paying party or compensates for services related to the case. Additionally, the bill mandates reporting by federal agencies about such agreements and requires annual audits of compliance. It also sets forth that no additional funding will be provided for these new reporting and auditing requirements, with a specific 7-year limit on some of the reporting obligations.
Summary of Significant Issues
Several issues arise from the provisions in this bill:
Funding Concerns: By not allowing additional funding for the reporting and auditing requirements, the bill might strain existing resources within federal agencies. This lack of funding could hamper the agencies' ability to monitor compliance with the new rules effectively.
Oversight and Transparency: The bill contains a sunset clause ending required reports after seven years. This could potentially lead to less oversight and transparency regarding settlement agreements involving the federal government.
Ambiguity in Definitions: The absence of a clear definition for "actual harm" might lead to varying interpretations, risking inconsistent applications of the law.
Narrow Definitions: The definition of what constitutes a "settlement agreement" could be too narrow, possibly excluding certain agreements from necessary scrutiny and regulation.
Public Access: While the bill requires reports to be submitted electronically to the Congressional Budget Office, it does not clearly ensure that these reports will be publicly accessible, which raises concerns about transparency and public awareness.
Impact on the Public and Stakeholders
The bill is positioned to affect various groups and stakeholders differently. Broadly, the public might benefit from more direct accountability regarding how the government handles money received from settlement agreements, theoretically reducing the risk of funds being diverted to unrelated projects or organizations.
However, this view assumes that the enforcement and reporting measures are effectively managed within current budget constraints. The lack of additional funding might hinder the agencies' ability to carry out these new responsibilities, potentially resulting in ineffective oversight. This could, ironically, undermine the bill's purpose of improving accountability.
For specific stakeholders, federal agencies could find themselves under increased administrative pressure. These agencies may have to reallocate resources to meet the new requirements, potentially impacting their core functions. Meanwhile, entities typically receiving funds through settlement agreements might be affected if these funds are redirected solely to the U.S. Treasury, impacting community programs or projects previously funded through settlements.
Overall, the bill's impact will hinge on the balance between enforcing new restrictions and ensuring that oversight mechanisms are sufficiently robust and transparent, without overburdening the agencies tasked with these duties.
Issues
The prohibition on additional funding for reporting and auditing (Section 2, subsections (e)(2) and (f)(2)) might limit the ability of Federal agencies to effectively monitor and report on compliance with the Act, potentially straining existing resources and undermining the enforcement of the new regulations.
The sunset clause on reports on settlement agreements (Section 2, subsection (e)(3)) might hinder long-term oversight, as it will cease to be effective 7 years from the Act's enactment, potentially leading to a lack of transparency and accountability in the future.
The definition of 'settlement agreement' in Section 2, subsection (d) might be too narrow or specific, possibly excluding certain types of agreements from necessary oversight and regulation under this Act, thereby creating loopholes.
The requirement for annual reports on settlement agreements to be submitted electronically to the Congressional Budget Office (Section 2, subsection (e)(1)) does not specify how transparency and public access to these reports will be ensured, raising concerns about the public's ability to stay informed.
The term 'actual harm' is not defined in Section 2, which might lead to ambiguity and varied interpretations about what constitutes harm requiring restitution, potentially leading to inconsistent application of the law.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section titled "Short title" states that the Act can be officially referred to as the “Stop Settlement Slush Funds Act of 2023”.
2. Limitation on donations made pursuant to settlement agreements to which the united states is a party Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section restricts U.S. government officials from entering settlement agreements that direct payments to anyone other than the U.S., unless it directly addresses harm caused by the violator or compensates services related to the case. It establishes reporting requirements for federal agencies and mandates annual audits by Inspectors General, with no additional funding for these tasks, and includes a 7-year sunset clause for certain reporting obligations.