Overview

Title

To direct the Secretary of State to designate MS–13 as a foreign terrorist organization, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

H.R. 7875 is a plan to officially call a gang called MS-13 a "bad guy" group like terrorists, which means people in the gang could get in big trouble and might not be allowed to enter the U.S. anymore.

Summary AI

H.R. 7875 is a bill introduced in the House of Representatives that directs the Secretary of State to designate the gang MS-13 as a foreign terrorist organization. It requires the Secretary to take this action under the authority of section 219 of the Immigration and Nationality Act. Additionally, the bill specifies that individuals who are members or affiliates of MS-13 will be considered to have engaged in terrorist activity under U.S. immigration law.

Published

2024-04-05
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Introduced in House
Date: 2024-04-05
Package ID: BILLS-118hr7875ih

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
3
Words:
277
Pages:
2
Sentences:
11

Language

Nouns: 87
Verbs: 17
Adjectives: 14
Adverbs: 0
Numbers: 12
Entities: 24

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.21
Average Sentence Length:
25.18
Token Entropy:
4.40
Readability (ARI):
14.42

AnalysisAI

Overview of the Bill

The bill, titled the "Every Town A Border Town Act," is designed to address security and immigration concerns by proposing the classification of the Mara Salvatrucha gang, commonly known as MS-13, as a foreign terrorist organization. It directs the Secretary of State to recognize MS-13, and any successor organizations, as such. Additionally, it amends the Immigration and Nationality Act to automatically categorize any member or affiliate of MS-13 as engaging in terrorist activity, making these individuals inadmissible to the United States.

Significant Issues

Designation as a Foreign Terrorist Organization

The proposal to designate MS-13 as a foreign terrorist organization raises several important questions. One significant issue is whether MS-13 meets the specific criteria used by the government to define such organizations. The bill lacks detail on the criteria or considerations warranting this designation, leaving room for debate over its appropriateness and the potential legal and political ramifications. It is uncertain how this classification might impact MS-13 members and affiliates, or how it might alter international relations and security practices related to terrorism.

Interpretation of Terrorist Activity

Another critical issue arises from the bill's language which classifies any MS-13 member as having engaged in terrorist activity. This blanket approach could lead to legal and ethical concerns. The bill does not specify the evidence required to prove someone's association with MS-13, nor does it clarify the due process involved in making such determinations. This could result in broad or arbitrary enforcement, impacting civil liberties and potentially inviting legal challenges. The absence of defined legal procedures raises concerns about due process and justice for individuals accused under these amendments.

Impact on the Public

The broad categorization of individuals as terrorists based on their affiliation with MS-13 could have wide-reaching implications. For the general public, this might mean increased security measures and scrutiny at borders, impacting not just individuals directly involved with MS-13 but also certain immigrant communities. There might be heightened tension and fear among those who feel unfairly targeted due to ethnic or cultural associations.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For law enforcement and national security agencies, the bill could offer a powerful tool to combat crime associated with MS-13 by enabling more aggressive actions against the organization. However, this might also strain resources and require additional training to properly implement these new measures without infringing on individual rights.

For members or perceived affiliates of MS-13, the bill poses significant risks not just legally, but in terms of personal safety and freedoms. The potential for arbitrary or overly broad enforcement could lead to serious human rights concerns and challenge the principles of fairness and justice.

In conclusion, while the intent of the "Every Town A Border Town Act" may stem from legitimate security concerns, its implementation raises substantial questions regarding legal fairness, human rights, and the overall effectiveness of such an approach in addressing terrorism and crime. The bill's focus on MS-13, to the exclusion of other potential threats, also highlights a narrow scope that might not fully address the complexities of global and domestic security issues.

Issues

  • The designation of MS-13 as a foreign terrorist organization (Section 2) could raise significant political and legal concerns, such as the criteria used for this designation and whether MS-13 meets these criteria appropriately. The lack of details about this could lead to debates and challenges regarding the appropriateness and effectiveness of such a designation.

  • The potential consequences of categorizing MS-13 as a foreign terrorist organization (Section 2) are not detailed, creating uncertainty about the impacts on MS-13 members or their affiliates. This could have implications for due process and human rights, as broader implications for international relations and security practices are considered.

  • The language in Section 3, which considers members of MS-13 as having engaged in terrorist activity, could lead to legal and ethical concerns such as broad or arbitrary application without specific legal procedures or evidence requirements. This ambiguity could result in challenges to the implementation and enforcement of this provision.

  • Section 3 raises concerns by equating membership or affiliation with MS-13 with engaging in terrorist activity without defined legal processes or evidence. This raises due process questions and may be perceived as a violation of civil liberties, potentially impacting a broad range of individuals associated with MS-13.

  • The bill's focus solely on MS-13 without addressing similar threats posed by other organizations (Section 3) could be perceived as biased or politically motivated, limiting its effectiveness in combating terrorism comprehensively. This narrow scope might be controversial in public and political discourse.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The first section of the Act states that its official title is “Every Town A Border Town Act.”

2. Designation of MS–13 as a foreign terrorist organization Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The bill requires the Secretary of State to officially label the gang Mara Salvatrucha (MS–13) and any similar future groups as a foreign terrorist organization, following the Immigration and Nationality Act.

3. Members of MS–13 considered to have engaged in terrorist activity Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section amends the Immigration and Nationality Act to classify any member, officer, official, representative, or spokesman of the gang Mara Salvatrucha (MS-13) as engaging in terrorist activity, making them inadmissible to the United States.