Overview

Title

To require the Secretary of Health and Human Services to issue guidance on furnishing behavioral health services via telehealth to individuals with limited English proficiency under Medicare program.

ELI5 AI

H.R. 7863 wants to help people who don't speak English very well get better mental health care using video calls. It tells the government to teach doctors and nurses how to use translators and other tools so everyone can understand each other and feel better.

Summary AI

H.R. 7863 aims to improve telehealth services for individuals with limited English proficiency who are receiving behavioral health care through Medicare. It requires the Secretary of Health and Human Services to issue guidance within a year, detailing best practices for using interpreters and video platforms, educating patients about telehealth technology, and providing medical information in multiple languages. The goal is to ensure effective communication and access to behavioral health services for non-English speaking patients.

Published

2024-04-02
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Introduced in House
Date: 2024-04-02
Package ID: BILLS-118hr7863ih

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
1
Words:
319
Pages:
2
Sentences:
11

Language

Nouns: 114
Verbs: 29
Adjectives: 20
Adverbs: 2
Numbers: 8
Entities: 28

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.87
Average Sentence Length:
29.00
Token Entropy:
4.61
Readability (ARI):
19.51

AnalysisAI

General Summary of the Bill

This piece of legislation, H. R. 7863, introduced to the United States House of Representatives on April 2, 2024, mandates that the Secretary of Health and Human Services must issue guidance for providing behavioral health services via telehealth to individuals with limited English proficiency. The bill is particularly focused on enhancing accessibility to Medicare beneficiaries by outlining best practices for working with interpreters, integrating video platforms for telehealth services, teaching patients to use these platforms, and offering multilingual patient materials and communications. This initiative aims to improve service delivery and address language barriers faced by non-English speaking individuals in accessing healthcare.

Summary of Significant Issues

Several noteworthy issues are associated with this bill. First, the absence of specified budget limits or cost assessments could lead to fiscal inefficiencies, potentially resulting in wasteful spending. Additionally, the bill lacks clear metrics to measure the effectiveness or success of the new guidelines, making it challenging to assess their actual impact on the targeted population. The bill also sets a timeline of one year for issuing the guidance, which could delay the much-needed improvements and assistance to individuals with limited English proficiency. Moreover, there are concerns about potential biases in selecting technology vendors for implementing telehealth solutions due to vague language in the bill. The term "multi-person video calls" is ambiguous, necessitating a clearer definition to avoid confusion. Furthermore, unclear criteria for evaluating "limited English proficiency" could result in unequal access to services. Lastly, the bill fails to address how it intends to ensure equitable access to telehealth technologies for patients lacking necessary equipment or internet connectivity, which presents an issue of digital inclusivity.

Impact on the Public Broadly

Broadly speaking, this legislation could profoundly impact the public by enhancing access to healthcare services for many individuals who face language barriers. By focusing on telehealth, the bill recognizes the growing importance of remote healthcare delivery, especially for those who may not have easy access to in-person care. However, without addressing the highlighted issues such as budget constraints, performance metrics, and technology access, the intended benefits may not be fully realized. The success of this initiative largely hinges on the effective and inclusive implementation of the proposed guidelines.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

The bill could have varying effects on different stakeholders. For non-English speaking Medicare beneficiaries, this initiative could facilitate more equitable access to behavioral health services, thereby improving health outcomes. Healthcare providers might benefit from standardized best practices, which could enhance the quality of care provided and potentially reduce liability associated with miscommunication. On the downside, healthcare providers might also face increased administrative burdens and costs related to technology adoption and training.

Technology vendors could be positively impacted by an increase in demand for their platforms, leading to potential growth opportunities. However, without clear guidelines, there may be an uneven playing field favoring certain companies over others. Policymakers and government bodies must carefully address these issues to ensure that the bill's implementation is fair, effective, and truly beneficial to all parties involved.

Issues

  • The lack of specified budget limits or cost assessments in Section 1 could lead to potential wasteful spending, raising concerns about financial oversight and accountability.

  • The absence of clear metrics in Section 1 for measuring the effectiveness or success of the implemented guidance may hinder the ability to assess its real impact on individuals with limited English proficiency.

  • The timeline for issuing the guidance in Section 1, set at 'not later than 1 year after the date of enactment,' could delay necessary improvements and support for individuals with limited English proficiency, impacting timely access to healthcare.

  • There is a potential risk in Section 1 of favoring specific technology vendors for video platforms due to the lack of detailed guidance, which could lead to biases or unfair market advantages.

  • The ambiguity of the term 'multi-person video calls' in Section 1 requires clarification regarding the minimum and maximum number of participants involved to ensure clear guidelines are established.

  • The definition and assessment criteria for 'limited English proficiency' in Section 1 are not clear, potentially leading to inconsistent application of the guidance and unequal access to services.

  • The lack of strategies in Section 1 to ensure equitable access to telehealth technologies for patients without necessary equipment or internet access raises concerns about digital inequality and accessibility.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Guidance on furnishing behavioral health services via telehealth to individuals with limited English proficiency under Medicare program Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section mandates that within one year, the Secretary of Health and Human Services must issue or update guidelines for providing behavioral health services through telehealth to people who don't speak English well. This includes working with interpreters, using video platforms, teaching patients to use telehealth tools, and providing materials in multiple languages.