Overview

Title

To amend section 405 of title 23, United States Code, to permit a State to use grant funds for the purpose of providing on-bicycle education, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

The BIKE Act of 2024 wants to help kids learn how to ride bikes safely by letting states use special money to teach bike riding skills, how to be safe, and why wearing helmets is important. It also asks for new safety guidelines and a report to see how the teaching is going after three years.

Summary AI

H.R. 7842, also known as the “Biking Instruction, Knowledge, and Education Act of 2024” or the “BIKE Act of 2024”, seeks to amend section 405 of title 23 of the United States Code to allow states to use grant money to provide on-bicycle education for students in elementary and secondary schools. The bill mandates that the Secretary of Transportation revise guidelines to promote bicycle and pedestrian safety education tailored for young students, emphasizing skills, safety, traffic rules, and helmet use. Moreover, the bill requires consultations with education practitioners and calls for a report on the impact and implementation of these updated safety guidelines to be submitted to Congress within three years.

Published

2024-03-29
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Introduced in House
Date: 2024-03-29
Package ID: BILLS-118hr7842ih

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
3
Words:
603
Pages:
4
Sentences:
6

Language

Nouns: 192
Verbs: 50
Adjectives: 18
Adverbs: 2
Numbers: 30
Entities: 47

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.26
Average Sentence Length:
100.50
Token Entropy:
4.78
Readability (ARI):
52.11

AnalysisAI

Summary of the Bill

The proposed legislation, titled the “Biking Instruction, Knowledge, and Education Act of 2024” (BIKE Act of 2024), aims to expand the use of federal grant funds under section 405 of title 23 of the United States Code. This amendment seeks to allow states to use these funds to provide on-bicycle education for elementary and secondary school students. The bill also mandates the Secretary of Transportation to revise existing safety guidelines related to pedestrians and cyclists. This includes encouraging bicycle training for students, heightening awareness of traffic rules, and promoting helmet use. The revised guidelines are expected to be consulted with educational practitioners and disseminated to state educational agencies. Furthermore, a report about these revisions and their dissemination is due to Congress within three years of the bill's enactment.

Significant Issues

The bill presents several issues that require attention:

  1. Undefined Budget Allocation: A prominent issue is the lack of specific funding allocation to support the on-bicycle education program. Without clear budgetary boundaries, there is a risk of overspending, which raises concerns about fiscal responsibility.

  2. Ambiguity in Terminology and Implementation: The term "on-bicycle education" is not clearly defined, potentially leading to inconsistent teaching methods and goals across various states. Additionally, the bill does not specify the entities responsible for delivering this education, which could result in a lack of accountability and possible favoritism in selecting providers.

  3. Guideline Revision and Implementation Challenges: While the bill requires the Secretary to update the safety guidelines, it fails to specify a funding source for these efforts. This could result in financial inefficiency. Moreover, the tutorial provided for implementing these changes lacks detailed metrics for measuring success and efficacy.

  4. Delayed Reporting Timeline: The timeline set for reporting to Congress is three years after the enactment, which may postpone crucial insights into the program’s effectiveness, delaying necessary improvements.

Impact on the Public

The introduction of on-bicycle education has the potential to significantly impact public safety positively by educating young cyclists on safe riding practices. Broadly, increasing awareness and proficiency in navigating roadways can enhance safety for both cyclists and motorists, potentially reducing accidents.

Impact on Stakeholders

  • Educational Sector: Schools and educational institutions will likely bear the responsibility of integrating these new educational programs. This could require additional resources, staff training, and adjustments to existing curricula.

  • Local Governments and State Agencies: The responsibility for implementing these programs without clear funding sources or metrics could strain local resources. They may face challenges in ensuring the effectiveness and consistency of the program's application.

  • Providers of Cycling Education: Organizations involved in delivering cycling education might benefit from increased opportunities. However, without specific guidelines on provider qualifications or program criteria, outcomes may vary.

  • Parents and Guardians: Families may welcome the emphasis on safer cycling practices for children, but they may also be concerned about any potential costs associated with program participation, such as helmet provision.

Overall, while the bill aims to enhance biking education and safety, the lack of clear guidelines and funding sources may pose challenges in achieving its intended goals. Addressing these issues could ensure a more effective and equitable implementation, benefiting a wider range of stakeholders.

Issues

  • The section titled 'Grant funds to provide on-bicycle education' (Section 2) does not specify how much funding will be allocated. This lack of a defined budget could lead to overspending and financial mismanagement, which is significant for fiscal accountability and public trust.

  • The term 'on-bicycle education' in Section 2 is not explicitly defined within the bill, leading to potential varied interpretations. This ambiguity might cause inconsistency in program implementation across different states, impacting the program's effectiveness.

  • Section 2 lacks specifics about the organizations or individuals responsible for providing on-bicycle education. This absence of detail could foster favoritism and reduce accountability, raising ethical concerns about the equitable distribution of funding and program delivery.

  • Section 3 does not provide a designated budget or funding source for revising guidelines on pedestrian and bicycle safety. This could lead to unaccounted spending and inefficiencies, which is crucial for proper budgeting and resource allocation.

  • The report timeline of three years after the enactment date in Section 3 may delay the acquisition of insights needed for improving the guidelines and their implementation. This delay might hinder timely adjustments needed to enhance the program's efficacy.

  • Section 2 and 3 do not outline clear metrics or procedures for assessing the effectiveness of the on-bicycle education program and the revised safety guidelines. Without clear evaluation methods, it would be difficult to measure success and make necessary improvements, which is central for program accountability and effectiveness.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The first section of the act provides the official name, which is the “Biking Instruction, Knowledge, and Education Act of 2024” or simply the “BIKE Act of 2024”.

2. Grant funds to provide on-bicycle education Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section updates part of a U.S. law to include providing on-bicycle education for elementary and secondary school students as an eligible use of grant funds. This means money can be given to support programs teaching kids how to ride bicycles safely.

3. Revision of guidelines on pedestrian and bicycle safety Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The bill requires the Secretary to update safety guidelines for pedestrians and bicyclists within one year, focusing on student education, bike training, and helmet use. It also calls for collaboration with educational practitioners, widespread distribution of revised materials, and a report to Congress within three years detailing the implementation, consultation, and dissemination efforts.