Overview

Title

To establish the Advisory Council on African Diaspora Engagement in the United States, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

The bill wants to make a team of up to 12 people who will help the U.S. work better with people who have moved from Africa to live in the U.S. They will meet four times a year to share ideas with important government leaders.

Summary AI

H. R. 784, introduced in the House of Representatives on January 28, 2025, is a bill to establish the Advisory Council on African Diaspora Engagement in the United States. The Council, consisting of up to 12 members appointed by the Secretary of State, will advise the President on strengthening ties between the U.S. Government and African diaspora communities. It will focus on strategies to improve equity, cultural connections, and economic collaboration, among other objectives. The Council will meet quarterly and brief relevant congressional committees after each session.

Published

2025-01-28
Congress: 119
Session: 1
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Introduced in House
Date: 2025-01-28
Package ID: BILLS-119hr784ih

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
2
Words:
848
Pages:
5
Sentences:
22

Language

Nouns: 300
Verbs: 52
Adjectives: 45
Adverbs: 3
Numbers: 17
Entities: 92

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.73
Average Sentence Length:
38.55
Token Entropy:
4.84
Readability (ARI):
23.63

AnalysisAI

General Summary of the Bill

The bill titled "African Diaspora Council Act" seeks to establish an "Advisory Council on African Diaspora Engagement in the United States" within the Department of State. The primary role of this council would be to advise the President on strengthening relationships and fostering connections with African diaspora communities within the U.S. The council is envisioned to be diverse, consisting of up to 12 members representing African American and African immigrant communities. Their responsibilities would include developing strategies to enhance cultural, social, political, and economic ties, and supporting educational exchanges and other initiatives to benefit the African diaspora.

Summary of Significant Issues

Several issues emerge from the structure and proposals of the bill:

  1. Unchecked Expenditures: The bill doesn't specify budget allocations or limits for the Advisory Council, raising concerns about potential overspending.

  2. Appointment Process: The broad discretion granted to the Secretary of State in appointing council members could lead to a lack of transparency and potential favoritism.

  3. Equitable Representation: Members serve without compensation, limiting participation to those who can afford unpaid roles, which may not represent all community voices equitably.

  4. Broad Discretion in Agenda: The inclusion of "other topics the Secretary of State considers relevant" allows the council's focus to widen potentially unnecessarily, resulting in mission drift.

  5. Ambiguity in Political Neutrality: The term "without regard to political affiliation" might lack effective enforcement, risking partisan influences.

  6. Meeting Frequency: The flexible meeting schedule, which could lead to excessive gatherings, lacks clear necessity criteria, potentially increasing administrative costs.

  7. Insufficient Oversight: Details about the Congressional briefings are vague, potentially limiting effective oversight and accountability.

Impact on the Public

The bill has the potential to positively impact the broader public by promoting awareness and inclusivity of African diaspora communities, enriching cultural diversity, and fostering economic and social opportunities. However, without clear budgetary controls and transparency, it might lead to misuse of resources, affecting taxpayers.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

  • African Diaspora Communities: Positively, this council could amplify their voices, address community issues, and facilitate more robust connections with the U.S. government. However, the lack of compensation for council members could deter participation from less financially stable individuals, limiting diversity.

  • Public Sector Entities: The Department of State could face challenges with potential increases in spending without allocated budget controls and the additional administrative responsibilities of forming and supporting the council.

  • Policy Makers: These individuals might gain useful insights into African diaspora communities' needs, aiding informed decision-making, but they might also face criticism if the council's outcomes do not match its expansive agenda.

Overall, while the bill aims to strengthen ties and improve outcomes for African diaspora communities, its effectiveness will heavily depend on the implementation of measures that ensure financial accountability, transparency, and genuine representation from diverse community sectors.

Issues

  • The potential for unchecked expenditures is a significant concern, as Section 2(b) outlines the establishment of the Advisory Council without specifying budget allocations or limits, which could result in wasteful spending if not properly managed.

  • The appointment process for the Advisory Council, as mentioned in Section 2(b)(1), may lack transparency or appear to favor certain individuals, especially given the broad discretion granted to the Secretary of State in selecting members.

  • Section 2(b)(2) mentions that Advisory Council members will serve without compensation or reimbursement, which could limit the diversity of participation and favor individuals who can afford unpaid service, raising ethical concerns about equitable representation.

  • The phrase 'such other topics the Secretary of State considers relevant' in Section 2(c)(2)(G) is notably broad and allows for potentially unrelated subjects to be included in the Advisory Council's agenda, leading to mission drift and inefficiency.

  • There is ambiguity regarding the mechanism ensuring bipartisan or non-partisan membership in Section 2(b)(1), as the phrase 'without regard to political affiliation' could be seen as insufficient without clear enforcement measures.

  • The meeting frequency requirement in Section 2(e) ('quarterly basis or more frequently as necessary') might induce excessive meetings, potentially increasing costs without clear criteria for necessity.

  • Section 2(f) involves briefing congressional committees, but it is unclear how detailed these briefings are intended to be, potentially affecting the level of oversight and ability to prevent inefficiency or mismanagement.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The first section of the Act states that the law can be officially referred to as the “African Diaspora Council Act”.

2. Advisory council on African diaspora engagement in the united states Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The bill section establishes an "Advisory Council on African Diaspora Engagement in the United States" within the Department of State, comprising up to 12 diverse members representing African American and African immigrant communities. The Council's role is to advise the President on strengthening connections with the African diaspora in the U.S., and it will focus on enhancing opportunities, supporting cultural ties, and fostering educational exchanges, while meeting regularly and coordinating with Congressional committees.