Overview
Title
An Act To require the Secretary of Homeland Security to develop a plan to identify, integrate, and deploy new, innovative, disruptive, or other emerging or advanced technologies to enhance, or address capability gaps in, border security operations, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
The Emerging Innovative Border Technologies Act wants the people in charge of keeping our borders safe to use cool new gadgets, like robots and tiny machines, to do their job better and keep everyone’s information safe. They need to think about privacy, work with smart companies, and tell Congress what new tools they’re using every year.
Summary AI
H.R. 7832, titled the Emerging Innovative Border Technologies Act, directs the Secretary of Homeland Security to create a plan to improve border security using advanced and emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence and nanotechnology. The legislation mandates evaluating privacy and security impacts, incentivizing private sector collaboration, and ensuring technologies are responsibly deployed. It establishes CBP Innovation Teams to adapt commercial technologies and coordinates with various Department of Homeland Security offices to protect civil rights and privacy. The bill also requires annual reporting to Congress on innovation team activities and technology progress.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
The "Emerging Innovative Border Technologies Act" is a legislative proposal that aims to strengthen the capabilities of the U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) by incorporating new, innovative, disruptive, and advanced technologies. This bill mandates the Secretary of Homeland Security, through CBP and the Department’s Under Secretary for Science and Technology, to create a comprehensive plan for deploying these technologies along international borders and at U.S. ports of entry. The technologies under consideration include artificial intelligence, drones, fiber-optic sensing, nanotechnology, and more. The overarching goal is to enhance border security operations by filling existing capability gaps and improving efficiency.
Summary of Significant Issues
Clarity and Definition Concerns:
One of the primary issues with this bill is the use of undefined terms like "disruptive" technologies, which are inherently vague and open to interpretation. This lack of precision could lead to inconsistency in implementation and accountability challenges.
Budgetary Uncertainty:
The bill does not set clear budgetary limitations nor does it thoroughly address the financial implications of deploying these new technologies. This absence of clear financial guidelines raises concerns over potential overspending or the need for additional appropriations, which could burden taxpayers or lead to financial mismanagement.
Implementation Timeframe:
The bill stipulates a 180-day deadline for the development of the technology plan. This short timeframe may pressure the involved agencies, potentially leading to rushed decisions and inadequately vetted technology plans, affecting long-term efficiency and effectiveness.
Privacy and Civil Rights Impact:
There is a notable emphasis on assessing the potential privacy and security impacts of new technologies on border communities. However, if not sufficiently addressed, these aspects might lead to heightened public opposition and possible legal challenges. Balancing security improvements while maintaining civil liberties will be crucial.
Impact on the Public and Stakeholders
Broad Public Impact:
The implementation of advanced technologies as outlined in the bill has the potential to strengthen national security, potentially reducing illegal activities at the border. However, there could be privacy concerns, particularly if the deployment of surveillance technologies is perceived as invasive by border communities.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders:
- Government Agencies: Agencies like CBP will gain advanced tools to perform their duties more effectively, which might enhance operational capabilities. However, they will also face the challenge of integrating these technologies within existing frameworks, possibly requiring new training and resources.
Technology Developers: Companies that develop such advanced technologies could see increased opportunities and demand for their products. There is also a push to involve small and disadvantaged businesses, which might foster innovation and economic growth in these sectors.
Border Communities: For individuals residing near borders, the deployment of such technologies could lead to heightened security but might also raise concerns about privacy and civil liberties. The implementation of these technologies must therefore strike a delicate balance between improved security and respecting individual rights.
Civil Liberties Advocates: There is potential for conflict with advocacy groups focused on privacy and civil rights, especially if the technologies are perceived to encroach on personal freedoms or result in discriminatory practices.
Overall, while the bill strives to address significant national security concerns through the adoption of cutting-edge technologies, it poses questions about financial viability, ethical implementation, and the potential for unintended consequences, particularly around privacy and civil liberties. How these issues are navigated will determine the bill's actual impact and its reception by the public and specific interest groups.
Issues
The timeframe of 'not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act' in Section 2(a) may place significant pressure on involved agencies, potentially leading to rushed decisions or incomplete plans. This could affect the efficacy and strategic implementation of the technologies, impacting their success and the efficient use of resources.
The absence of explicit budgetary implications or constraints in Section 2 raises concerns about potential overspending or the need for additional appropriations, especially given the wide scope of technological deployment discussed. This financial uncertainty can lead to future budgetary conflicts or resource mismanagement.
The language throughout Section 2 regarding 'new, innovative, disruptive, or other emerging or advanced technologies' is vague and could result in wasteful spending on speculative technologies that may not be practical or necessary. Without clear criteria for evaluating these technologies, this could lead to financial and strategic inefficiencies.
The term 'disruptive technologies' used in various subsections is high-level and abstract, lacking precise definitions. This vagueness can lead to inconsistent understanding among stakeholders, misalignment on goals, and challenges in measuring program success, ultimately impacting the effectiveness of border security operations.
In Section 2(c), the authorization of CBP Innovation Teams without clear limitations on size or cost poses potential risks of unnecessary expansion or overspending of resources. This could lead to operational inefficiencies and a lack of accountability.
Section 2(b)(9)'s assessment of privacy and security impacts on border communities due to new technologies could raise significant ethical and civil liberties concerns. Insufficient attention to these impacts might exacerbate public opposition and lead to legal challenges.
Section 2(b)(12) lacks specificity regarding CBP's capability or resources to adopt identified technologies effectively. This could result in the acquisition of technologies without the necessary infrastructure or expertise to implement them successfully, leading to wastage of resources.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the bill states that the official name of this legislation is the "Emerging Innovative Border Technologies Act".
2. Innovative and emerging border technology plan Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines a plan for the Secretary of Homeland Security to identify and deploy new technologies, such as artificial intelligence and drones, to improve border security. It also explains how the Customs and Border Protection (CBP) will form teams to research these technologies, evaluate their effectiveness, and coordinate with other government and private sector entities to enhance border operations.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of this act states that it will be officially known as the “Emerging Innovative Border Technologies Act”.
2. Innovative and emerging border technology plan Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines a plan for the Department of Homeland Security to implement new and advanced technologies to improve border security. It includes creating teams to identify and test these technologies, ensuring they are safe and respect privacy and civil rights, and coordinating with various government offices and the private sector to achieve these goals.