Overview

Title

An Act To require the Secretary of Homeland Security to develop a plan to identify, integrate, and deploy new, innovative, disruptive, or other emerging or advanced technologies to enhance, or address capability gaps in, border security operations, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

The "Emerging Innovative Border Technologies Act" is like a plan to use new cool gadgets and smart computers to make the borders safer, and this plan will be checked to see how well it works.

Summary AI

H.R. 7832, known as the "Emerging Innovative Border Technologies Act," requires the Secretary of Homeland Security to create a plan to improve border security using cutting-edge technologies. The plan will involve identifying, integrating, and deploying advanced technologies such as artificial intelligence, machine learning, and radar systems. The bill mandates regular evaluations and reports on how these technologies can address security gaps and requires coordination with various sectors, including the private sector and federal labs, to develop new solutions. The House of Representatives passed the bill on September 23, 2024.

Published

2024-09-23
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Engrossed in House
Date: 2024-09-23
Package ID: BILLS-118hr7832eh

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
2
Words:
1,488
Pages:
10
Sentences:
24

Language

Nouns: 449
Verbs: 151
Adjectives: 121
Adverbs: 10
Numbers: 28
Entities: 56

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.76
Average Sentence Length:
62.00
Token Entropy:
5.05
Readability (ARI):
35.45

AnalysisAI

General Summary of the Bill

The "Emerging Innovative Border Technologies Act" is aimed at bolstering the security operations of the United States' borders through the integration of cutting-edge technologies. Sponsored within the 118th Congress, this legislative act mandates the Secretary of Homeland Security to formulate a comprehensive plan. The envisioned technologies include artificial intelligence, machine learning, fiber-optic sensing, and drones, among others, which are anticipated to address existing security gaps and enhance the overall effectiveness of border operations. Within 180 days of enactment, this plan is to be submitted to the Congressional Committees responsible for Homeland Security.

Summary of Significant Issues

While the bill carries substantial potential for improving border security, it also harbors several critical issues. The 180-day deadline for formulating the plan may exert significant pressure on the involved agencies, possibly leading to hasty decisions. Additionally, the bill’s language includes several high-level terms such as "disruptive technologies" and "capability gaps," which lack precise definitions. This ambiguity could result in inconsistent interpretations and applications. Further, the bill does not clearly outline the budgetary constraints or implications, leaving room for potential financial concerns or the requirement for additional appropriations.

Impact on the Public

For the general public, this bill signifies a potential enhancement in national security, particularly regarding illegal immigration and contraband trafficking across borders. By leveraging advanced technologies, the effectiveness and efficiency of surveillance and inspection processes could improve, ideally ensuring a safer environment for citizens. However, the accelerated timeline and broad scope of technological integration might lead to disruptions or unanticipated consequences if not managed carefully.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

Government Agencies: This bill would directly affect the Department of Homeland Security and Customs and Border Protection, which must allocate significant resources to research, integrate, and evaluate emerging technologies within a constrained timeframe. Agencies could face increases in operational complexity and demands on their existing infrastructure.

Technology Providers: Companies specializing in advanced security technologies might see new opportunities to partner with government entities, bringing potential growth in contracts and innovation engagements. However, the absence of clearly defined guidelines could prove challenging for these stakeholders, leading to uncertainties in depending on agency requirements.

Border Communities: Residents near borders could experience both positive and negative impacts. On one hand, enhanced security might contribute to reduced crime rates and increased safety. On the other hand, there may be concerns over privacy and the implications of increased surveillance in their daily lives.

Overall, while the Emerging Innovative Border Technologies Act aspires to strengthen national security through the adoption of modern technologies, careful consideration and precise planning will be essential to mitigate potential issues arising from the bill's ambitions. The efficacy of this bill will largely depend on its implementation and the ability to address the emergent concerns surrounding privacy, budget, and clear operational directives.

Issues

  • The phrase 'not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act' in Section 2(a) might create a tight deadline that could pressure the agencies involved and lead to rushed decisions or incomplete plans.

  • The language regarding 'existing or new programs of record' under Section 2(c)(1) and Section 2(c)(2)(A) is vague and could cause confusion about the transition of technologies.

  • Many terms used throughout Section 2, such as 'disruptive technologies', 'capability gaps', and 'metrics', are high-level and abstract without precise definitions, which could lead to inconsistent understanding or measurement of the program's success.

  • Section 2(b)(5) involves an analysis of authorities available to CBP for procurement but lacks specificity regarding what criteria will determine if additional or alternative authorities are needed.

  • The text does not explicitly mention the budgetary implications or constraints for the initiatives presented in Section 2, raising concerns about potential overspending or the necessity for additional appropriations.

  • The list of technologies in Section 2(a) is long and diverse, suggesting broad scopes and potentially unspecific targeting, which could lead to fragmented efforts and diffuse accountability.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The first section of the bill states that the official name of this legislation is the "Emerging Innovative Border Technologies Act".

2. Innovative and emerging border technology plan Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section outlines a plan for the Secretary of Homeland Security to identify and deploy new technologies, such as artificial intelligence and drones, to improve border security. It also explains how the Customs and Border Protection (CBP) will form teams to research these technologies, evaluate their effectiveness, and coordinate with other government and private sector entities to enhance border operations.