Overview

Title

To amend the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 with respect to certain grants authorized for Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant Program.

ELI5 AI

H.R. 7826 wants to update a law to help police on tribal lands by making sure people get letters when a court says they must stay away from someone, but it might be too costly and confusing without clear details on how it will be paid for or measured.

Summary AI

H.R. 7826 proposes changes to the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 to enhance the Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant Program. The bill focuses on improving law enforcement on tribal lands by ensuring that there are programs for providing written notifications of restraining orders. It defines key terms like "tribal lands," "Indian tribe," and "written notification" to clarify how these grants should be applied, facilitating better enforcement of orders issued by Indian tribes.

Published

2024-03-26
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Introduced in House
Date: 2024-03-26
Package ID: BILLS-118hr7826ih

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
2
Words:
401
Pages:
3
Sentences:
13

Language

Nouns: 145
Verbs: 29
Adjectives: 15
Adverbs: 0
Numbers: 20
Entities: 43

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.07
Average Sentence Length:
30.85
Token Entropy:
4.73
Readability (ARI):
16.60

AnalysisAI

The proposed legislation, known as the "Tribal Community Protection Act of 2024," seeks to amend the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968. This amendment focuses on expanding the scope of the Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant Program. Specifically, it aims to support programs that provide written notification of restraining orders specifically related to enforcement on tribal lands.

General Summary

The bill introduces changes to an existing law to include programs that will notify Indian tribes about restraining orders affecting their communities. It defines crucial terms such as "tribal lands," "Indian tribe," and "written notification" to ensure clarity in the implementation of these new requirements. The goal is to enhance communication regarding legal orders that might impact tribal lands and their residents.

Summary of Significant Issues

One notable issue with the bill is its reliance on traditional communication methods for sending notices—specifically, registered or certified mail with return receipt requested. This choice may result in higher costs and inefficiencies, particularly when modern alternatives, such as electronic notifications, could potentially deliver the same information more efficiently and at a lower cost.

Additionally, there's a lack of clarity concerning the funding for these programs. Without explicit information on funding allocations, there could be challenges in maintaining oversight and accountability, which raises concerns about how resources might be managed or potentially misused.

Moreover, while the bill references the Federally Recognized Indian Tribe List Act of 1994 for the definition of "Indian tribe," incorporating a direct quotation could enhance clarity and prevent misunderstandings in the application of the law.

Finally, the legislation introduces new programs without outlining the intended outcomes or success metrics. Without clear objectives and evaluation criteria, it may be difficult to assess the programs' effectiveness and impact.

Impact on the Public

For the general public, especially those residing on or near tribal lands, this bill signifies an effort to improve legal processes and communication channels. The intended changes could provide tribal communities with timely information about legal measures that might affect them, possibly leading to better enforcement and administration of justice.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For tribal governments and communities, this bill holds particular significance. Effective notification about restraining orders could enhance the enforcement of such orders, thereby increasing protection for individuals on tribal lands. However, the cost and efficiency concerns regarding the communication method could impose undue burdens on tribal administrations.

Legal and administrative bodies involved in enforcing this bill may also face challenges. Without precise funding guidelines and success measures, they could struggle with implementing the programs effectively, leading to potential inefficiencies.

Overall, while the bill aims to address important communication gaps regarding legal orders on tribal lands, there are significant issues related to communication methods, funding clarity, and outcome measurement that need to be addressed to ensure the legislation meets its objectives effectively.

Issues

  • The amendment to the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 introduces programs for written notification on restraining orders on tribal lands. The specification of 'registered or certified mail, with return receipt requested' as the sole method for written notification may incur higher costs and inefficiencies. Modern communication methods could provide more cost-effective alternatives. (Section 2)

  • The amendment lacks detailed information on funding allocation for the new programs, such as providing written notifications about restraining orders on tribal lands. Without this information, it is challenging to ensure proper oversight and accountability, raising concerns about the potential misuse of funds. (Section 2)

  • The definition of 'Indian tribe' references the Federally Recognized Indian Tribe List Act of 1994. However, the bill could include a direct quotation from this Act to prevent any ambiguity or misinterpretations. Ensuring clear definitions is critical for legal and operational clarity. (Section 2)

  • The addition of new programs within the amendment does not specify the intended outcomes or how success will be measured. This vagueness could lead to inefficiencies and a lack of accountability in program implementation, as there are no clear metrics for evaluating program effectiveness. (Section 2)

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section states that the official short title of the Act is the “Tribal Community Protection Act of 2024.”

2. Grants authorized for Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant Program Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section of the bill amends the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 to include programs for notifying Indian tribes about restraining orders on tribal lands. It also defines key terms like "tribal lands," "Indian tribe," and "written notification" to clarify these updates.