Overview
Title
To exempt certain structures from removal from Army Corps of Engineers property on Table Rock Lake, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
The bill says that people living near Table Rock Lake can keep their buildings and other things on the land owned by the Army without having to move them. The government will not be responsible if these things get damaged because of how the lake is managed.
Summary AI
H.R. 7818, also known as the "Table Rock Lake Property Protection Act," proposes to stop the removal of certain structures from Army Corps of Engineers property around Table Rock Lake. The bill would allow property owners to keep these structures by giving them either ownership of the minimum land necessary or releasing restrictive easements. The U.S. government would not be responsible for any damage caused by lake operations, and there would be no compensation claims allowed for using the land easements.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
The bill, H.R. 7818, titled the "Table Rock Lake Property Protection Act," aims to address the removal of certain structures from Army Corps of Engineers property at Table Rock Lake. It intends to exempt specific buildings from removal procedures and offers property owners opportunities to maintain these structures without facing liability for damages caused by lake operations.
General Summary
The proposed legislation primarily focuses on structures located on federally managed lands around Table Rock Lake, which spans Missouri and Arkansas. It requires the Secretary of the Army to pause activities that compel eligible property owners to dismantle certain structures. Additionally, the bill offers land conveyances or releases to these owners, under conditions that maintain structures without further expansion or relocation. This legislation specifies important terms such as "eligible property owner," "eligible structure," "fee land," and "flowage easement," to delineate which structures and individuals are affected.
Significant Issues
Several issues arise from this bill. Firstly, categorizing septic systems as "eligible structures" suggests potential oversight regarding environmental impacts. Septic systems need careful management to prevent pollution, particularly near large bodies of water, yet the bill lacks specific environmental safeguarding measures.
Another concern is the disclaimer that the United States will not be liable for any damages incurred by structures due to lake operations. This provision may impose financial hardship on property owners if they face damages and are denied compensation.
The bill preferentially addresses "eligible property owners" who hold an existing license for right-of-way, potentially overlooking fairness to those without such licenses but with related interests or concerns.
Broader Impact
If enacted, this bill could relieve property owners around Table Rock Lake from potential structural and financial burdens by ensuring they can retain existing buildings without facing forced removal. However, the lack of government liability might expose them to unprotected risks.
From a wider perspective, suspending removal activities might influence future legislative actions for properties around other lakes managed by the Army Corps of Engineers, fostering uneven policy implications.
Stakeholder Impact
Positive Impact: Property owners directly benefit as they receive the opportunity to keep their structures intact without the fear of impeding governmental action. This action provides stability and assurance, allowing them to plan without apprehension of unexpected costs or removals.
Negative Impact: Should there be significant ecological consequences, local ecology and environments might suffer, affecting broader community interests in environmental preservation. Additionally, residents who lack right-of-way licenses might perceive this bill as biased towards certain groups, leading to potential dissent or demands for equivalent allowances.
Overall, while the Table Rock Lake Property Protection Act offers a reprieve to certain property owners, its broader implications on fairness, environmental health, and precedent-setting require careful consideration to balance individual and community needs.
Issues
The inclusion of septic systems in the definition of 'eligible structure' in Section 2 might necessitate specific environmental considerations that are not adequately addressed in the current bill text, potentially leading to significant environmental impacts.
The provision in Section 2 that the 'United States shall not be liable or responsible for damage to the eligible structure caused by the operation of the Lake' might lead to disputes and financial burdens for property owners if they are unable to secure compensation for damages.
Section 2 includes language that could potentially favor 'eligible property owners' who have already acquired a license for right-of-way, raising fairness concerns for other stakeholders affected by the Lake who might not have such licenses.
The process and criteria for the conveyance or release of land to 'eligible property owners' in Section 2 are not clearly defined, potentially creating ambiguity and disputes over the 'minimum land required to maintain the eligible structure.'
The suspension of activities requiring eligible property owners to remove structures as specified in Section 2 could set a precedent for other areas managed by the Corps of Engineers, resulting in inconsistent policy application across different regions.
The provision that 'the eligible structure shall not be extended further onto fee land or land subject to the flowage easement' in Section 2 could lead to disputes regarding property boundaries and might complicate future developments or enhancements made by the property owners.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the bill is titled “Table Rock Lake Property Protection Act," which indicates the name by which this Act will be known.
2. Table Rock Lake encroachment Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section details the actions the Secretary of the Army must take concerning structures around Table Rock Lake; they must pause any removal of certain structures and offer property owners options to maintain those structures or lift certain restrictions, while assuring the U.S. is not responsible for any damages resulting from lake operations. It also explains key terms like "eligible property owner" and "flowage easement" to clarify who and what is affected by these actions.