Overview

Title

To authorize the Secretary of Education to award grants to create evidence-based student success programs designed to increase participation, retention, and completion rates of high-need students.

ELI5 AI

In this bill, the government wants to help students who need extra support finish college by giving schools money to start helpful programs. They want to especially help kids who don't have a lot of money, whose parents didn't go to college, or who belong to groups that need more help.

Summary AI

H.R. 7811, the "Postsecondary Student Success Act of 2024," aims to help high-need students finish higher education by providing grants to educational institutions. The Secretary of Education is authorized to award these grants to help institutions implement evidence-based programs that improve student participation, retention, and completion rates. Priority is given to programs targeting low-income students, first-generation college students, and other high-need groups. The bill also reserves funds specifically for Tribal Colleges or Universities and includes provisions for evaluating the effectiveness of funded programs.

Published

2024-03-22
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Introduced in House
Date: 2024-03-22
Package ID: BILLS-118hr7811ih

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
5
Words:
2,310
Pages:
12
Sentences:
51

Language

Nouns: 729
Verbs: 180
Adjectives: 136
Adverbs: 11
Numbers: 101
Entities: 111

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.29
Average Sentence Length:
45.29
Token Entropy:
5.17
Readability (ARI):
24.78

AnalysisAI

Summary of the Bill

The bill titled the "Postsecondary Student Success Act of 2024" is a legislative proposal designed to authorize the U.S. Secretary of Education to distribute grants. These grants aim to develop student success programs that utilize evidence-based strategies to boost the participation, retention, and degree completion rates of students identified as high-need. The bill identifies several types of institutions and partnerships as eligible for these grants and outlines a framework for evaluating and monitoring funded initiatives. It also reserves specific funds for eligible Indian entities to support high-need students.

Summary of Significant Issues

One of the primary issues with the bill is the ambiguity surrounding the criteria used to assess different tiers of evidence-based reforms. Without clear metrics, it may be difficult for educational institutions to implement these programs consistently, and for evaluators to measure their effectiveness comprehensively.

The definition of "high-need student" also presents some challenge since it incorporates several categories without sufficient guideline detail. This lack of clarity could lead to varying interpretations across entities in determining which students qualify for participation in these programs.

Furthermore, the bill reserves 2% of total appropriated funds for Indian entities but does not provide a clear definition of what constitutes an "eligible Indian entity." This omission could lead to administrative confusion, potentially excluding deserving institutions from accessing grants.

Finally, the provision allowing only one campus of an institution with branch campuses to receive a grant at any time may favor larger institutions, limiting the scope of collaborative or comprehensive initiatives that require funding for multiple sites simultaneously.

Impact on the Public

Broadly speaking, the bill aims to increase access to higher education and improve outcomes for students who face financial, social, or educational challenges. By focusing on evidence-based methods, the intention is to provide effective support systems that lead to higher graduation rates, thus equipping students with the qualifications necessary for gainful employment. The public may benefit from a stronger, more educated workforce resulting from the successful implementation of this bill.

The reservation of funds specifically for Indian entities is a targeted effort to address disparities in education access and success within Native American communities. This focus could lead to improvements in educational outcomes for students in these communities, potentially reducing inequalities.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

Educational Institutions: Educational institutions stand to benefit from the financial support that the grants would provide. However, they may face challenges due to the lack of detailed guidelines within the bill, which could impact their ability to create effective programming. Institutions that understand how to navigate the complexities of the application process and use the funds efficiently are likely to see significant advantages.

High-Need Students: High-need students, including first-generation college students and students from low-income backgrounds, are at the focus of this initiative. If executed well, these students would gain access to enhanced support services, potentially leading to increased college retention and completion rates. Nonetheless, due to the ambiguity in defining "high-need," some students might not benefit if institutions interpret guidelines restrictively.

Eligible Indian Entities: The 2% funding carve-out is designed to boost participation and completion rates for Native American students, potentially narrowing the educational achievement gap. Without clear guidelines, however, the risk of misallocation exists, which could undercut the intended impacts.

Government and Policymakers: For policymakers, this bill represents an attempt to leverage data and proven strategies to address systemic issues within higher education. Nevertheless, the lack of clear metrics and definitions may result in ineffective policy execution and difficulty in oversight.

In conclusion, while the bill represents a promising approach to improving postsecondary outcomes for vulnerable student populations, its execution could be hampered by the lack of specificity in several crucial areas. Stakeholder engagement and policy revisions would be necessary to ensure grants meet the intended goals without wasteful spending or misinterpretation.

Issues

  • The section on 'Authorization of postsecondary student success competitive grants' (Section 5) outlines various evidence-based reforms but lacks specific criteria or metrics for distinguishing between evidence tiers 1, 2, and 3. This could lead to inconsistent implementation and difficulty in assessing the effectiveness of funded programs.

  • The definition of 'high-need student' in Section 3 includes several categories without clear guidelines, potentially leading to different interpretations and inconsistent application of eligibility criteria.

  • The 'Reservation of funds for eligible Indian entities' (Section 4) lacks definition for 'eligible Indian entities,' leading to potential ambiguity and exclusion in grant qualification.

  • The allocation of 2 percent of total funds for eligible Indian entities in Section 4 is not justified, raising concerns about potential wasteful spending or disproportionate allocation.

  • Without specific metrics or methods for evaluating 'evidence-based participation' and 'high-need students' in the Purpose section (Section 2), there may be challenges in verifying the effectiveness of funded programs, leading to potential misuse of resources.

  • The provision in Section 5 for up to 5% of the funds for administration, capacity building, research, evaluation, and reporting is ambiguously defined and may lead to wasteful spending. Similarly, the cap of 2% for technical assistance could be misused without clear oversight, contributing to inefficiencies.

  • The requirement that eligible entities with branch campuses may only receive a grant for one campus at a time, as stated in Section 5, may inadvertently favor larger institutions and could restrict multi-campus projects that may require simultaneous funding for cohesion and greater impact.

  • The definition section (Section 3) lacks specific financial implications or spending details, which complicates the assessment of potential fiscal impacts, including wasteful spending, especially with undefined terms and cross-references that may change.

  • The reliance on cross-references to other Acts in the Definitions section (Section 3), such as 'dual or concurrent enrollment program' and 'early college high school,' could create ambiguity if those Acts are amended or repealed, complicating interpretation and application.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The first section gives the official short title of the law, which is the “Postsecondary Student Success Act of 2024.”

2. Purpose Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The purpose of this section is to support programs that use proven methods to help high-need students start, stay in, and successfully finish their college education.

3. Definitions Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

This section of the Act defines key terms related to education, including "completion rate," which refers to the percentage of students graduating from or transferring to different institutions, and "high-need student," which encompasses students from various challenging backgrounds. It also covers terms like "dual or concurrent enrollment program," "eligible entity," "evidence-based," and others, explaining their meanings in the context of the law.

4. Reservation of funds for eligible indian entities Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The Secretary is required to set aside 2 percent of the total funds available each year to make grants to eligible Indian entities. These grants are intended to help increase the participation, retention, and graduation rates of students who are in high-need situations.

5. Authorization of postsecondary student success competitive grants Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

For fiscal years 2025 to 2030, the bill allows for grants to schools and colleges to help more high-need students get into and finish their programs. These grants fund plans using proven methods to boost student success and retention, with a focus on services like advising and career prep, and set guidelines for evaluating their effectiveness.