Overview

Title

To amend title 18, United States Code, to prohibit certain abortion procedures, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

This bill is about making new rules for doctors who perform certain types of medical procedures called abortions. It wants doctors to be able to work at a nearby hospital and for clinics to follow special safety rules to keep people healthy and safe.

Summary AI

H.R. 78, titled the “Pregnant Women Health and Safety Act of 2025,” aims to limit certain abortion procedures in the United States by amending title 18 of the U.S. Code. It requires physicians performing abortions to have admitting privileges at a nearby hospital and to inform patients where they can get care if complications arise. The bill establishes penalties, including fines and imprisonment, for physicians who don't comply, but it does not prosecute women undergoing the procedures. Additionally, it mandates that abortion clinics must be state-licensed and meet certain surgical center standards to receive federal funds, although some structural requirements may be waived by state health boards.

Published

2025-01-03
Congress: 119
Session: 1
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Introduced in House
Date: 2025-01-03
Package ID: BILLS-119hr78ih

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
4
Words:
808
Pages:
4
Sentences:
22

Language

Nouns: 227
Verbs: 64
Adjectives: 33
Adverbs: 5
Numbers: 36
Entities: 54

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.10
Average Sentence Length:
36.73
Token Entropy:
4.95
Readability (ARI):
19.62

AnalysisAI

The proposed legislation, titled the "Pregnant Women Health and Safety Act of 2025," aims to amend the United States Code to regulate specific aspects of abortion procedures and the operations of clinics where such procedures are performed. Introduced in the House of Representatives, this bill comprises a few key provisions intended to enhance the oversight of abortion practices and facilities.

General Summary of the Bill

The bill mandates that physicians performing abortions must have admitting privileges at a hospital within 15 miles of where the procedure takes place. Additionally, physicians must inform patients of where to seek follow-up care if complications develop. Any physician failing to adhere to these requirements could face criminal penalties, including fines and imprisonment. Importantly, the law specifies that women receiving the procedure cannot be prosecuted under this section.

Further, the bill stipulates requirements for abortion clinics to receive federal funding. These clinics must be licensed by their state and meet standards akin to those for ambulatory surgery centers, though some structural requirements may be waived if deemed appropriate by state health boards.

Summary of Significant Issues

Several issues arise from the bill's stipulations. One major concern is the requirement for doctors to have hospital privileges within 15 miles, which could be impractical in rural regions with fewer hospitals, potentially reducing access to abortion services. This provision might inadvertently pressure physicians, particularly in less populated areas, to discontinue providing such services due to logistical difficulties.

The bill also imposes stringent penalties of fines and possible imprisonment on non-compliant physicians, which could discourage medical professionals from offering abortion services, further limiting access. The bill's demand for clinics to comply with ambulatory surgery center standards could impose financial burdens, threatening the viability of these clinics and subsequently reducing available services.

Impact on Public and Specific Stakeholders

Broadly, this bill could lead to reduced access to abortion services, particularly in rural and underserved areas, where meeting the hospital privilege requirement is less feasible. The possibility of clinic closures due to the financial strain of compliance suggests that women may have fewer options for care, potentially leading to health and safety risks.

For healthcare providers, the bill could introduce a chilling effect, wherein the potential legal and financial consequences discourage them from offering abortion services. This impact could decrease the number of available providers, making it harder for those seeking these services to find appropriate care.

On the other hand, supporters of the bill might argue that such regulations ensure higher standards of care and safety for abortion procedures, protecting women's health by aligning clinics with recognized medical standards.

Positive or Negative Impacts on Stakeholders

The bill might positively impact stakeholders who support increased regulation and safety of abortion services, potentially seeing it as a way to advance overall healthcare quality. However, for healthcare providers and patients, particularly those in rural areas, the impacts appear largely negative. Physicians face potential criminal penalties, and the logistic and financial barriers imposed on clinics could lead to service reductions and heightened disparities in healthcare access.

In summary, while the bill proposes measures intended to elevate the standards of abortion care, its broad implications suggest significant hurdles for healthcare access, potentially placing additional burdens on both patients and providers. Stakeholder reactions will likely vary, reflecting differing perspectives on the regulation and accessibility of abortion services.

Issues

  • The requirement for physicians to have admitting privileges at a hospital within 15 miles could disproportionately affect rural doctors or those in areas with fewer hospitals, potentially limiting access to abortion services (Section 2).

  • The definition of 'physician' may be limited or ambiguous, as it relies on the legal authorization of the state, which can vary significantly, potentially affecting the scope of who is eligible to perform abortions (Section 2).

  • The penalties for physicians who violate subsection (c) are severe (up to 2 years in prison), which may discourage qualified professionals from performing abortions, potentially impacting the availability of services (Section 2).

  • The requirement for abortion clinics to comply with ambulatory surgery centers regulations under title XVIII of the Social Security Act may impose significant financial burden on these clinics, potentially leading to increased healthcare costs or closure of clinics (Section 3).

  • The waiver provision allows a State board of health to waive the application of certain structural requirements on abortion clinics. This could lead to inconsistent implementation of health and safety standards across different states, potentially compromising patient safety (Section 3).

  • The penalty section does not specify whether the fine amount is subject to a minimum or who determines the amount (Section 2).

  • The section does not address how it will be enforced or who will monitor compliance (Section 2).

  • The language could be perceived as targeting physicians specifically and not addressing broader systemic issues related to abortion access (Section 2).

  • The definition of 'abortion clinic' is somewhat vague as it does not specify the minimum number of procedures that would categorize a facility as an abortion clinic within the 12-month period (Section 3).

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

This section states the official short title of the law, which is the “Pregnant Women Health and Safety Act of 2025.”

2. Requirement for physicians relating to the performance of abortions Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section outlines requirements for physicians performing abortions, mandating that they must have admitting privileges at a nearby hospital and inform patients of where to get follow-up care if complications arise. It criminalizes non-compliance, with penalties of fines or up to two years of imprisonment, but ensures that women undergoing the procedure cannot be prosecuted under this law.

1532. Prohibition on certain procedures Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

In this section, it states that a doctor who performs an abortion must have hospital admitting privileges within 15 miles and inform the patient about where to get follow-up care if needed. It also says that if a doctor doesn't follow these rules, they could face fines or up to two years in prison, but the woman who undergoes the procedure cannot be prosecuted.

3. Requirement of abortion clinics Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

In order to receive federal funds, abortion clinics must be licensed by the state they're in and meet certain standards similar to those for surgery centers, unless waived by the state health board. An abortion clinic is defined as a place where abortions are performed, excluding hospitals or surgery centers.