Overview
Title
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to treat certain gains and dividends derived from counties of concern as ordinary income.
ELI5 AI
The bill wants to change how money earned from certain countries like China and Russia is taxed to make sure it's treated the same as regular earnings, which could mean paying more taxes. It also asks the government to tell people about this change and list the companies affected.
Summary AI
H.R. 7760, known as the "No Capital Gains Allowance for American Adversaries Act," aims to change how certain financial gains are taxed. The bill proposes that profits made from sales and dividends connected to companies based in countries like China, Russia, and others identified as concerns, should be treated as regular income rather than capital gains. This means such profits will be subject to a potentially higher tax rate. The bill also requires the Securities and Exchange Commission to inform investors about these changes and to publish a list of affected securities.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
Summary of the Bill
H.R. 7760, titled the "No Capital Gains Allowance for American Adversaries Act," seeks to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. This legislative proposal focuses on treating certain financial gains and dividends derived from countries considered adversaries of the United States as ordinary income. The main target countries include China, Russia, Belarus, Iran, and North Korea, with the exception of Taiwan for China-related concerns. If enacted, from January 1, 2025, profits from investments related to these countries will be taxed at regular income rates rather than the typically lower capital gains rates.
Significant Issues
One significant issue revolves around the bill's definition of "country of concern" and its exclusion of Taiwan. This exclusion may raise geopolitical concerns given Taiwan's complex relationship with China. Additionally, the bill's criteria for identifying "specified country of concern property" are complex, potentially confusing smaller entities and individual taxpayers who must comply.
A further concern is the bill's provision to deny the step-up in basis at death for these properties, which could financially burden heirs. The requirement for the Securities and Exchange Commission to notify purchasers about the ordinary income treatment of gains introduces potential administrative challenges and costs for both the Commission and sellers. Lastly, the short timeframe allocated to develop rulemaking might result in incomplete or hasty rules, potentially causing implementation issues.
Impact on the Public
Broadly, this bill aims to leverage the U.S. tax code as a strategic tool against countries perceived as adversaries. For the average taxpayer, the most tangible impact would be felt if they hold or plan to hold investments tied to such designated countries. The change from capital gains to ordinary income could result in higher tax liabilities, potentially influencing investment behaviors and financial planning strategies.
For regular citizens, the heightened reporting and administrative processes proposed by the bill could translate into higher transaction costs, indirectly impacting individuals and entities involved in securities transactions.
Potential Impacts on Specific Stakeholders
For investors with holdings in affected countries, particularly those with diversified or international portfolios, the bill may result in increased tax liabilities, potentially reorienting financial strategies to mitigate fiscal impacts.
The impact is not limited to individuals; businesses operating within or in association with these countries might face increased scrutiny, potentially affecting their market valuations and attractiveness to investors.
Additionally, administrative bodies like the Securities and Exchange Commission may experience operational strain due to the expanded reporting and notification mandates. This increased burden could necessitate additional resources, leading to broader implications for taxpayer-funded operations.
While this bill aims to protect national interests, its provisions may spark significant debate. The balance between economic strategy and fair taxation remains at the heart of its discourse, with stakeholders on all sides weighing in on its potential effects.
Issues
The bill defines 'country of concern' to include specific countries but excludes Taiwan (Section 1261(b)(2)(B)). This could raise geopolitical concerns or pushback due to Taiwan's complex international status and the current political climate surrounding China.
The term 'specified country of concern property' involves multiple criteria, making it difficult to interpret, especially for smaller entities or individual taxpayers (Section 1261(b)(1)). The complexity can lead to misinterpretations and legal challenges.
The denial of the step-up in basis at death for specified country of concern properties (Section 2(c)) could be considered harsh and financially punitive for heirs, potentially leading to challenges on grounds of fairness and equity.
The requirement for the Securities and Exchange Commission to notify purchasers about the ordinary income treatment of gains could impose significant reporting obligations on both the Commission and sellers (Section 2(d)). This could lead to administrative burdens and increased transaction costs.
The rulemaking timeframes (180 days post-enactment) may be challenging for the affected agencies, potentially leading to rushed or incomplete rules (Section 2(f)). This could result in implementation issues and litigation risks.
The language in the bill, such as 'controlled by' relying on external regulations like section 230.405 of title 17, Code of Federal Regulations (Section 1261(b)(2)(A)), might not be immediately clear to all stakeholders, creating legal ambiguities.
Publishing a list of securities that fall under 'specified country of concern property' may involve significant administrative challenges and could raise concerns about market impacts and strategic implications for affected businesses (Section 2(e)).
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section provides the short title of the act, which is called the "No Capital Gains Allowance for American Adversaries Act."
2. Certain gains and dividends derived from countries of concern treated as ordinary income Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill amends the Internal Revenue Code to treat gains from selling or exchanging property related to certain countries, like China or Russia, as regular income rather than capital gains. It also requires the Securities and Exchange Commission to notify involved parties and maintain a list of such securities, with these changes taking effect starting January 1, 2025.
1261. Gains derived from countries of concern treated as ordinary income Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Gain from the sale or exchange of certain properties linked to countries of concern, like China, Russia, and others, is treated as regular income for tax purposes. This includes securities or assets connected to companies primarily based in or influenced by these countries.