Overview
Title
To prohibit the purchase of certain securities from covered entities, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
H.R. 7759 is a rule that wants to stop people in the U.S. from buying or selling things like stocks from certain Chinese companies, especially if they are believed to do bad things like using forced labor. If someone breaks this rule, they might have to pay a lot of money or even go to jail, and this could make people worry about losing money quickly.
Summary AI
H. R. 7759, known as the “PRC Military and Human Rights Capital Markets Sanctions Act of 2024”, seeks to ban U.S. individuals and entities from buying, selling, or holding securities linked to certain Chinese entities, referred to as covered entities. These covered entities are specified as companies with ties to the Chinese military, human rights violations, or those linked to forced labor, among others. The bill mandates the U.S. President to compile and share a list of these entities and prescribes penalties for U.S. persons who do not comply, including hefty fines and potential imprisonment for willful violations.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
Overview of the Bill
The proposed legislation, introduced as House Bill 7759 during the 118th Congress, seeks to impose restrictions on the purchase, sale, and holding of certain securities from identified foreign entities, specifically targeting affiliations with the People's Republic of China (PRC). Known as the "PRC Military and Human Rights Capital Markets Sanctions Act of 2024," the bill mandates that the President of the United States compile a comprehensive list of these so-called "covered entities." These entities are typically those associated with military and human rights concerns as determined by various governmental and regulatory lists. The bill aims to prevent U.S. persons from engaging in financial transactions with these entities, thereby asserting economic sanctions as a tool of foreign policy.
Key Issues
Timeliness and Feasibility: The bill sets a tight deadline for the President to compile and maintain a list of covered entities within 90 days of the bill’s enactment. Given the complexity and international scope of these entities, this deadline may not be realistic. There is a significant risk of errors or omissions, which could undermine the bill’s effectiveness.
Divestment Challenge: Investors, particularly those with significant holdings in the affected securities, might find the divestment period of 180 days too short. This could lead to financial and logistical difficulties as they attempt to comply with the legislation without incurring severe losses.
Severity of Penalties: The bill proposes harsh penalties for non-compliance, including potential imprisonment for up to 20 years. Such severity could provoke public resistance and might be seen as disproportionate, given the nature of the infractions.
Breadth of Coverage: The definition of "covered entities" is broad, potentially capturing entities not initially intended as primary targets. This broad scope could inadvertently harm legitimate businesses and complicate enforcement.
Market Stability: Publicly identifying prohibited securities could provoke market instability or panic selling, with far-reaching implications for financial markets beyond the immediate scope of the bill.
Complex Enforcement of Derivatives: The inclusion of derivative securities introduces complexity, making enforcement challenging given their often indirect and complicated nature.
Regulatory Ambiguities: The reliance on multiple existing lists from various departments could lead to inconsistent application and difficulty in ensuring compliance.
Potential Impact on the Public and Stakeholders
For the general public, the legislation could lead to increased market volatility, affecting individual investments and retirement accounts that may include diversified holdings linked to the targeted securities. If market confidence is shaken, broader economic impacts could follow.
Specific stakeholders, such as financial institutions and investment firms, might face significant operational challenges in restructuring portfolios to comply with the new regulations. The financial sector will need to invest in compliance measures, potentially driving up costs for consumers.
Conversely, those advocating for stricter sanctions against entities associated with Chinese military operations or human rights abuses might view this bill positively. It could theoretically pressure foreign entities into more transparent operations and underscore the U.S.'s commitment to human rights.
In conclusion, while the intentions of H.R. 7759 align with promoting national security and human rights, the execution and potential ramifications of the bill warrant thorough examination and careful implementation to avoid unintended negative consequences on both domestic and international fronts.
Financial Assessment
The proposed legislation, H.R. 7759, introduces several key financial components that warrant examination. At its core, the bill seeks to restrict U.S. individuals and entities from engaging in financial activities related to specific Chinese entities identified as "covered entities." These financial restrictions have significant implications.
Financial Penalties
The bill outlines strict penalties for violations. Civil penalties could reach up to $250,000, or twice the amount of the transaction involved in the violation, whichever is greater. This stipulation introduces substantial financial repercussions for non-compliance, potentially deterring investment in the identified securities.
Moreover, individuals or entities that willfully engage in prohibited actions face criminal penalties, which include fines of up to $1,000,000 and, for individuals, possible imprisonment for up to 20 years. These severe penalties could provoke significant public reaction given their harsh nature. Particularly, the severity of the criminal penalties may contribute to concerns that the bill's punitive measures could be overly harsh or disproportionate, as indicated in the issues section.
Financial Implications of Divestment
The bill mandates divestment of affected securities within 180 days, which could present major financial and logistical challenges for investors, particularly those with substantial holdings. This requirement reflects a narrow timeframe for potentially complex and large-scale financial transactions. The necessity for rapid divestment may lead to market destabilization or unintended financial losses, aligning with concerns about the feasibility and economic impact of such divestment under current market conditions.
Indirect Financial Effects
The legislation's focus on prohibiting dealings in securities linked to "covered entities" indirectly impacts broader financial markets by potentially triggering market instability. This could occur as investors rush to divest holdings, potentially leading to panic selling or volatility affecting unrelated markets.
Additionally, the enforcement challenges associated with identifying and managing financial derivatives related to these securities might introduce further complexity. Derivatives markets are particularly complex, and ensuring compliance might burden both regulators and market participants financially and operationally.
Identification Challenges
The bill requires that each covered entity have a unique identification number, facilitating clear identification across financial systems. Given the diversity in global systems for financial instruments, this could be administratively challenging, potentially resulting in uncertainty or increased compliance costs for investors seeking to adhere to the law.
In summary, H.R. 7759 introduces significant financial considerations, including substantial penalties, divestment requirements, and potential impacts on market stability. These elements raise questions about the bill's overall financial implications, execution feasibility, and the potential for unintended consequences affecting the broader financial ecosystem.
Issues
The requirement in Section 2(a) for the President to compile and maintain a list of covered entities within 90 days might be too tight given the complexity of verifying entities and ensuring the list's accuracy. This could lead to errors or omissions that impact the bill's effectiveness.
The divestment requirement in Section 2(b) might not be realistic for all investors, particularly those with significant holdings, as it mandates divestment within 180 days. This could pose financial and logistical challenges.
The penalties outlined in Section 2(c) could be considered overly harsh, particularly the criminal penalty which includes imprisonment for up to 20 years. This might face public resistance due to its severity.
The definition of 'covered entity' in Section 2(d) is quite broad and may include entities not intended to be primary targets, potentially causing unintended consequences such as harming legitimate businesses.
The public identification and prohibition of certain securities in Section 2(a)(4) could lead to market instability or panic selling, affecting broader financial markets.
The enforcement of prohibitions on derivative securities in Section 2(a)(4)(B) might be practically challenging due to the complexity of derivative markets, making it difficult to ensure compliance.
The reference to various lists from different government departments and regulations in Section 2(d) could lead to ambiguity and inconsistency in identifying covered entities, complicating compliance efforts.
The requirement of a unique identification number for each covered entity in Section 2(a)(2) may be difficult to implement given global diversity in systems and identifiers, leading to potential compliance challenges.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section states that the Act will be known as the “PRC Military and Human Rights Capital Markets Sanctions Act of 2024”.
2. Prohibition on purchase of certain securities from covered entities Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill prohibits U.S. citizens from buying, selling, or holding securities linked to certain foreign entities identified by the President, who must compile a publicly accessible list of these entities. Individuals are required to sell any such securities within specified timeframes, and violations can lead to significant civil and criminal penalties.
Money References
- (1) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsection (a), a United States person shall divest of all securities described in subsection (a)— (A) with respect to a security identified by the President under subsection (a) before the end of the 90-day period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act, not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act; and (B) with respect to a security identified by the President under subsection (a) after the end of the 90-day period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act, not later than 180 days after the date of such identification. (2) FACILITATING DIVESTMENT TRANSACTIONS.—Subsection (a) shall not apply to a United States person to the extent the person is facilitating the divestment of securities described under paragraph (1). (c) Penalties.— (1) IN GENERAL.—A United States person that violates, attempts to violate, conspires to violate, or causes a violation of this Act shall be subject to the following penalties: (A) A civil penalty in an amount not to exceed the greater of— (i) $250,000; or (ii) an amount that is twice the amount of the transaction that is the basis of the violation with respect to which the penalty is imposed.
- (B) With respect to a United States person that willfully violates, willfully attempts to violate, willfully conspires to violate, or aids or abets in the commission of a violation of this Act shall be subject to a criminal penalty— (i) of a fine of not more than $1,000,000; or (ii) if such United States person is an individual, a fine of not more than $1,000,000, a term of imprisonment of not more than 20 years, or both. (2) AMOUNT OF A TRANSACTION DEFINED.—For purposes of paragraph (1)(A)(ii), the term “amount of a transaction” means— (A) with respect to a purchase that violates this Act, the purchase price; (B) with respect to a sale that violates this Act, the sale price; and (C) with respect to the holding of a security that violates this Act, the fair market value of the security at the time of the violation. (d) Covered entity defined.