Overview

Title

To direct the President to oppose any waiver of obligations of members of the World Trade Organization under the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights unless a statute is enacted expressly authorizing such a waiver.

ELI5 AI

The TRIPP Act wants to make sure that the President asks Congress for permission before changing any important rules about sharing "how to make things" secrets with other countries in a big group called the World Trade Organization.

Summary AI

H.R. 7741, known as the “Trade Related Intellectual Property Protection Act” or the “TRIPP Act,” instructs the President of the United States to oppose any waiver of obligations under the World Trade Organization's Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS Agreement) unless Congress passes a statute specifically authorizing such a waiver. The goal of the bill is to ensure that any waiver to the intellectual property obligations of WTO members follows an express legal authorization by the U.S. legislative branch.

Published

2024-03-20
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Introduced in House
Date: 2024-03-20
Package ID: BILLS-118hr7741ih

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
3
Words:
293
Pages:
2
Sentences:
12

Language

Nouns: 111
Verbs: 23
Adjectives: 2
Adverbs: 3
Numbers: 9
Entities: 31

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.45
Average Sentence Length:
24.42
Token Entropy:
4.37
Readability (ARI):
15.24

AnalysisAI

Summary of the Bill

The proposed legislation, known as the "Trade Related Intellectual Property Protection Act" or "TRIPP Act," directs the President of the United States to oppose any waiver of obligations by members of the World Trade Organization (WTO) under the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS). The President can only approve such waivers if a statute specifically authorizes them. The TRIPS Agreement, as mentioned, is a component of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act related to intellectual property rights.

Significant Issues

Ambiguity and Clarity

One of the primary issues with the bill is the ambiguity surrounding what is considered "a statute enacted expressly authorizing such a waiver." This lack of clarity could lead to legal uncertainties and differing interpretations of the bill's provisions. Additionally, the language used in defining the TRIPS Agreement refers to an existing legal framework, which might not be easily accessible to the general public.

Scope and Oversight

The bill does not specify any checks and balances on the President’s decision-making power regarding opposition to waivers. This raises concerns about potential executive overreach without legislative oversight. Moreover, the bill's title, "Trade Related Intellectual Property Protection Act," does not clearly communicate its intent, potentially leading to misunderstandings about the bill’s scope and objectives.

Lack of Financial Implications

The bill also doesn’t address potential financial implications, which are crucial for assessing any potential for wasteful spending or biased allocation of resources. This omission could impact how various stakeholders perceive the bill's fiscal responsibility and economic impact.

Potential Impact on the Public

General Public

For the general public, especially those without a legal background, the bill could appear complex due to its specific references to the TRIPS Agreement and external legislation. Without further clarification, it might be challenging for the public to understand the implications fully.

Specific Stakeholders

The bill could significantly impact stakeholders involved in international trade and intellectual property rights. By potentially limiting the ability of the United States to agree to waivers under the TRIPS Agreement, the bill might affect negotiations in international forums. This could have both positive and negative consequences:

  • Positive Impact: For industries that rely heavily on intellectual property protections, such as pharmaceuticals and technology, this bill might provide a stable environment by ensuring that international obligations are consistently upheld.

  • Negative Impact: On the flip side, developing countries or organizations advocating for more flexible intellectual property rules—especially in cases of global emergencies like pandemics—might view the bill as a hindrance to accessing essential services or technologies.

In conclusion, while the TRIPP Act aims to safeguard intellectual property rights, its lack of clarity and potential oversight issues could lead to varied interpretations and consequences, affecting both international relations and domestic stakeholders.

Issues

  • The bill lacks clarity on what is considered 'a statute enacted expressly authorizing such a waiver,' which could lead to legal and interpretational uncertainties (Section 2).

  • The section defining the TRIPS Agreement may be inaccessible to readers without legal expertise due to its reference to external legislation, creating potential misunderstandings about the bill's scope (Section 3).

  • There is no detail on the checks and balances or oversight of the President's power to oppose waivers, raising concerns about executive overreach without sufficient legislative control (Section 2).

  • The title 'Trade Related Intellectual Property Protection Act' or 'TRIPP Act' does not clearly communicate the bill's full intent or the specific areas of intellectual property it covers, potentially leading to misunderstandings about its scope (Section 1).

  • The short title section does not address any potential financial implications or objectives, limiting the ability to evaluate whether there could be wasteful spending or resource allocation issues (Section 1).

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The first section of the bill states that it can be referred to as the “Trade Related Intellectual Property Protection Act” or simply the “TRIPP Act.”

2. Opposition to waiver of obligations of WTO members under the TRIPS Agreement Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The President is required to oppose any requests to waive obligations of the World Trade Organization members under the TRIPS Agreement unless there is a specific law passed that permits such a waiver.

3. TRIPS Agreement defined Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section defines the TRIPS Agreement as the part of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act that deals with Intellectual Property Rights.