Overview
Title
To repeal section 115 of the Clean Air Act.
ELI5 AI
H. R. 7728 is a proposed law that wants to get rid of a rule from the Clean Air Act that helps control pollution going from one place to another, like from one state to another or from the U.S. to other countries. The bill doesn't say why it wants to remove this rule, which might make people worry about how it would affect keeping the air clean.
Summary AI
H. R. 7728 proposes to repeal section 115 of the Clean Air Act. This section deals with the regulation of pollutants that cross state or national borders. In addition to repealing the section, the bill also amends section 110(a)(2)(D)(ii) of the Clean Air Act to remove references to section 115 regarding interstate and international pollution abatement.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
The proposed legislation, H.R. 7728, aims to repeal a specific provision within the Clean Air Act, namely Section 115. This section currently addresses pollution issues that affect both interstate and international environments. The bill, titled the "Energy Sovereignty Act," introduces two key changes. Firstly, it seeks to eliminate Section 115 of the Clean Air Act entirely. Secondly, it makes a conforming amendment to another section of the Act, Section 110(a)(2)(D)(ii), by removing the reference to Section 115.
General Summary of the Bill
The bill's purpose is to repeal Section 115 of the Clean Air Act. The section currently mandates cooperation in addressing pollution that can affect the air quality across national and international boundaries. In tandem, the bill amends references in related legislation to ensure consistency after the repeal. The bill is introduced and currently under consideration by the Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Summary of Significant Issues
A significant issue with the bill is its lack of explanation regarding the intent and potential impact of repealing Section 115. The Committee's decision to strike a pivotal section dealing with international and interstate pollution abatement comes without an accompanying narrative or reason why this change is deemed necessary. This leaves room for concern and speculation about the potential environmental and diplomatic implications.
Impact on the Public Broadly
For the general public, the repeal of Section 115 could have far-reaching environmental impacts. This section of the Clean Air Act plays a critical role in managing pollution that crosses state and national borders, which means its repeal could impair efforts to control air pollution nationally and globally. Without federal mandates requiring cooperation to address such pollution, individual states might find it challenging to tackle cross-border environmental issues effectively.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Environmental Groups: Organizations focused on environmental protection might view the repeal as a step backward in the fight against global pollution. They could argue that it weakens international oversight and cooperation, potentially leading to increased air quality issues.
State Governments: States adjacent to international borders or with significant cross-state air pollution concerns might face challenges without federal backing to address these issues. This could prompt interstate disputes or necessitate new cooperative frameworks independent of the federal government.
Industries: Some industries, particularly those subject to stringent pollution controls, might support the bill if it leads to relaxed regulations. This could be seen as reducing operational costs associated with international compliance.
International Relations: There may be diplomatic ramifications if the U.S. withdraws from established international pollution agreements, which could complicate relationships with neighboring countries impacted by U.S.-based pollution.
Conclusion
While the intent behind H.R. 7728 might be to assert energy sovereignty, its broader implications require careful consideration. Without a clear rationale or supporting justification provided within the bill, stakeholders are left to speculate on both its necessity and its consequences. The lack of transparency and justification may raise questions within both national and international forums, emphasizing the need for further debate and analysis to fully understand the potential impacts of this legislative change.
Issues
The repeal of Section 115 of the Clean Air Act could potentially have major implications for international and interstate pollution abatement efforts, as detailed in Section 2. The bill lacks an explanation or justification for this repeal, which may raise concerns about both the transparency and the environmental impact of this legislative change.
Section 2 of the bill provides no context or information on what Section 115 of the Clean Air Act entails, making it difficult for readers unfamiliar with legislative details to understand the potential ramifications of this repeal.
The bill text under Section 2 assumes the reader understands the implications of removing references to Section 115 without providing sufficient detail on the nationwide environmental policy impact or discussing alternative solutions or compensatory measures.
Section 1, titled 'Short title,' is notably brief and offers no explanatory context beyond naming the bill the 'Energy Sovereignty Act,' which could confuse stakeholders and the public about its purpose and ramifications.
Without additional context from other sections or supporting documents, the bill's intentions, specifically in Sections 1 and 2, are not clear, potentially leading to misunderstandings or misinterpretations regarding its effects on energy policies and environmental regulations.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section states that this legislative act will be officially known as the "Energy Sovereignty Act."
2. Repeal Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Section 2 of the bill proposes two changes: first, it repeals Section 115 of the Clean Air Act, which deals with international and interstate pollution abatement; second, it updates a related reference in Section 110 to remove mention of Section 115, focusing solely on Section 126 for interstate pollution issues.