Overview

Title

To direct the heads of certain Federal agencies to develop and support worker-owned cooperative businesses, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

H.R. 7721 is like a plan to help people share and run their own stores or businesses together. It tells some government helpers to make it easier for people to start these shared businesses and teach others about them.

Summary AI

H.R. 7721, known as the "National Worker Cooperative Development and Support Act," aims to promote worker-owned cooperative businesses in the United States. It directs several federal agencies to implement programs that support and expand these businesses, ease regulatory barriers, and assist in accessing funding. The bill also establishes a United States Council on Worker Cooperatives to coordinate efforts, develop strategies, and report progress. Additionally, it includes educational initiatives to raise awareness and support the transition of traditional businesses into worker-owned cooperatives.

Published

2024-03-19
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Introduced in House
Date: 2024-03-19
Package ID: BILLS-118hr7721ih

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
7
Words:
1,534
Pages:
9
Sentences:
23

Language

Nouns: 413
Verbs: 144
Adjectives: 67
Adverbs: 7
Numbers: 72
Entities: 100

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.25
Average Sentence Length:
66.70
Token Entropy:
4.86
Readability (ARI):
34.95

AnalysisAI

General Summary of the Bill

The proposed legislation, titled the "National Worker Cooperative Development and Support Act," aims to foster the development and expansion of worker-owned cooperative businesses. The bill directs various federal agencies to implement programs that remove barriers, facilitate access to capital, and support educational efforts toward this end. A key component is the establishment of the United States Council on Worker Cooperatives, tasked with coordinating federal actions and creating a strategy for integrating worker cooperatives into the national economy. The bill also makes amendments to the Small Business Act and other existing laws to better support worker-owned cooperatives. Additionally, it involves outreach programs to educate communities and ensure resources are accessible to non-English speaking populations.

Summary of Significant Issues

Several significant issues arise from the bill. The responsibilities assigned to the United States Council on Worker Cooperatives lack specificity, leading to potential inefficiencies. The bill significantly increases funding for a lending program from $20 million to $60 million without clear justification, raising concerns about possible wasteful spending. Ambiguities regarding the definitions and responsibilities pertaining to worker-owned cooperative businesses could lead to inconsistent implementation. Furthermore, the criteria for educational materials and outreach efforts are vague, potentially resulting in ineffective resource allocation.

Impact on the Public

Broadly speaking, the bill seeks to empower workers by promoting economic models that offer more ownership and control to employees. If successfully implemented, it could lead to a more equitable distribution of business profits and strengthen local economies by keeping wealth within communities. However, the lack of clear guidelines and definitions risks uneven application of the bill's provisions, which might mitigate potential benefits for the public.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

Workers and Small Businesses: The bill could positively impact workers and small businesses by enabling them to transition to cooperative models, providing access to funding, and reducing regulatory hurdles. These changes might offer greater job security and decision-making powers for employees.

Government Agencies: The bill places substantial responsibilities on various government agencies to promote and support worker-owned cooperatives. Without clear directions and adequate funding, these agencies might struggle to efficiently and effectively fulfill their new roles, potentially leading to delays or incomplete implementation.

Non-English Speaking Communities: The bill aims to include these communities through translated educational resources and outreach programs. However, the vagueness about which languages to include could lead to insufficient or inappropriate resources for certain populations, unintentionally excluding them from the intended benefits.

Advocates of Cooperative Models: These stakeholders might view the bill positively as it aligns with their goals to promote cooperative business models across the nation. However, they may also be concerned about the bill's execution and the potential for underwhelming results due to vague definitions and guidelines.

Overall, while the bill has the potential to bring about significant positive changes in promoting worker-owned businesses, its success will largely depend on how effectively the government can navigate the issues of clarity, funding, and implementation raised in the legislative text.

Financial Assessment

In analyzing the financial references contained within H.R. 7721, the "National Worker Cooperative Development and Support Act," several key areas warrant a closer look, particularly in the context of potential impacts and concerns.

Financial Allocations and Changes

One of the prominent references to money in this bill is found in Section 5, which involves the Small Business Intermediary Lending Pilot Program. The bill proposes amending this program to increase its funding authorization significantly. Specifically, it suggests raising the cap from $20,000,000—a figure used in 2011, 2012, and 2013—to $60,000,000 for the years 2024 through 2034. This substantial increase underscores a legislative intent to bolster financial support for worker-owned cooperative businesses over a decade.

Connection to Identified Issues

The proposal to increase funding in Section 5 brings about potential concerns related to financial management and oversight. A tripling of the authorized budget might raise alarms about the efficiency of resource utilization and whether such expenditures are sufficiently justified for achieving the bill’s goals. Without clear metrics or justifications for this increase, there is a risk of wasteful spending. The absence of explicit criteria for evaluating the success of such a program could mean that the substantial financial outlay may not be monitored or assessed effectively.

Definitions and Eligibility Concerns

Also in Section 5, the amendment narrows the definition of an "eligible intermediary" to specifically include worker cooperatives. This might exclude other non-cooperative entities that previously qualified as intermediaries under the Small Business Act framework. Such a change can have a significant impact on the program beneficiaries and brings into question whether the new definition serves the broadest range of qualified candidates, or if it unduly restricts funding access.

General Observations

Across the bill, there is a notable absence of detailed guidelines concerning financial allocations for various initiatives. For example, Sections 2 and 6 refer to "innovative financing options" and "education and facilitation of services," yet do not specify how funds will be allocated, tracked, or assessed for effectiveness. This lack of specificity can lead to inconsistent implementation and inefficiencies across the agencies involved.

Finally, the bill’s general scope on fiscal matters does not outline interim evaluations or spending audits, especially concerning the 10-year timeline of the Council’s operations under Section 4. Such oversight mechanisms are crucial to ensure that public funds are not only spent effectively but also deliver the intended outcomes in promoting worker-owned cooperative businesses.

In conclusion, while H.R. 7721 sets out ambitious goals for supporting cooperative businesses, the financial references within the bill highlight areas where clarity and strategic oversight are essential to avoid inefficiencies and maximize the benefits of increased funding.

Issues

  • The definition and responsibilities of the United States Council on Worker Cooperatives are broad and lack specificity (Section 4). Key issues include potential inefficiencies due to vague responsibilities, a lack of clear funding mechanisms, and missing metrics for evaluating success. Additionally, the termination clause spans 10 years without interim evaluations, which might not be appropriate without ongoing assessments.

  • Section 5 presents a steep increase in authorized funding from $20,000,000 to $60,000,000 for the Small Business Intermediary Lending Pilot Program. This might raise concerns of potential wasteful spending if there is no strong justification provided for such a budget increase.

  • Section 2 introduces a lack of specificity regarding the 'innovative financing options' and definitions related to 'worker-owned cooperative businesses,' which might lead to varied and potentially inconsistent implementation across different agencies.

  • The mandate for educational and outreach materials, as specified in Section 3, lacks clarity about what constitutes 'accessible' educational materials and 'multiple languages,' potentially resulting in inadequate resource allocation.

  • The amendment to 'eligible intermediary' in Section 5 could narrow or significantly alter the range of entities eligible, potentially disadvantaging other suitable non-cooperative entities or organizations within the Small Business Act framework.

  • Section 6 introduces 'education and facilitation of services' for worker-owned cooperative businesses, yet lacks specific guidelines for spending or effectiveness, which could lead to inefficient fund usage.

  • The lack of detailed definitions or criteria for 'worker-owned cooperative business' and 'eligible worker-owned cooperative' (Section 7) could result in ambiguity and varied interpretations, impacting the bill's implementation.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The first section of this act gives it the title “National Worker Cooperative Development and Support Act.”

2. Promotion of worker-owned cooperative business by certain agencies Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

In this section, it outlines the responsibilities of certain government agencies to promote and support worker-owned cooperative businesses. These agencies are tasked with removing regulatory barriers, providing access to capital, conducting research, offering education and technical help, and working alongside related organizations to foster the growth and integration of worker-owned cooperatives into the economy.

3. Education and outreach relating to worker-owned cooperative business Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section mandates that the Administrator of the Small Business Administration create educational materials about worker-owned cooperative businesses, ensuring they are available online, in print, and in multiple languages. An outreach program is also to be initiated in communities where English is not the primary language.

4. Establishment of the United States Council on Worker Cooperatives Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The United States Council on Worker Cooperatives is established by the Secretary of Labor to promote worker-owned cooperative businesses across the Federal Government. The Council, made up of various governmental representatives, is tasked with developing strategies, identifying regulatory barriers, and coordinating data and educational initiatives, with an annual reporting requirement, and is set to expire in ten years.

5. Small business intermediary lending pilot program for worker-owned cooperative business Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section of the bill modifies the Small Business Act to update the definition of an "eligible intermediary" to mean a cooperative and adjusts funding years and amounts, allowing for $60 million annually from 2024 to 2034 for worker-owned cooperative businesses.

Money References

  • Section 7(l) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 636(l)) is amended— (1) in paragraph (1), by striking subparagraph (A) and inserting the following: (2) in paragraph (4)(G)— (A) by striking “2011, 2012, and 2013” and inserting “2024 through 2034”; and (B) in clause (ii), by striking “$20,000,000” and inserting “$60,000,000”. ---

6. CDFI education and guidance about the value of worker-owned cooperative business Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The amendment to the Riegle Community Development and Regulatory Improvement Act of 1994 adds a new provision to help with education and services for starting and running worker-owned cooperative businesses. This involves changing some structure and wording in the existing law to include this new focus.

7. Definitions Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section defines terms used in the Act, specifically identifying a "covered agency" as certain federal entities like the Small Business Administration and the Internal Revenue Service, and describing a "worker-owned cooperative business" as an entity that is either set up under state laws for worker cooperatives and primarily owned by its employees, or meets the definition of an "eligible worker-owned cooperative" according to the Internal Revenue Code.