Overview
Title
An Act To prohibit the Secretary of Energy from prescribing or enforcing energy conservation standards for dishwashers that are not cost-effective or technologically feasible, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
H.R. 7700 is a bill that wants to make sure rules for making dishwashers use less energy are only made if they are easy to do and don't cost people more money. It's like making sure your toy works while also not making your piggy bank sad.
Summary AI
H.R. 7700, titled the “Stop Unaffordable Dishwasher Standards Act,” aims to ensure that energy conservation standards set for dishwashers by the Secretary of Energy are both technologically feasible and economically justified. The bill prevents the Secretary from establishing or enforcing any standards that could lead to increased costs for consumers or do not significantly conserve energy. These provisions are intended to avoid unnecessary financial burdens on consumers while promoting effective energy saving measures.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
Summary of the Bill
The proposed legislation, referred to as the "Stop Unaffordable Dishwasher Standards Act," seeks to control the establishment and enforcement of energy conservation standards for dishwashers. Specifically, it prevents the Secretary of Energy from setting or implementing these standards unless certain criteria are met. These criteria include the standards being technologically feasible, economically justified, not leading to additional costs for consumers, and significantly conserving energy. With this bill, the legislators aim to ensure that any new regulations related to dishwasher energy usage are practical, justified, and do not burden consumers financially.
Significant Issues
The bill presents several key issues that could affect its interpretation and implementation. Firstly, it lacks precise definitions for important terms such as "technologically feasible," "economically justified," and "significant conservation of energy." This vagueness could result in disputes and challenges when applying the law. Similarly, the phrase "not likely to result in additional net costs to the consumer" is ambiguous and might lead to differing interpretations about the true financial impact on consumers.
Another area of concern is the exemption of subsections (m), (n), and (o) from existing laws without providing an explanation of what these subsections entail. This could lead to uncertainty and questions about the legislative intent and which existing laws might be affected or nullified.
Impact on the Public
Broadly, the bill aims to balance the benefits of energy conservation with the potential costs to consumers. It seeks to ensure that any new regulations do not impose undue financial burdens on individuals who rely on dishwashers as part of their daily lives. By emphasizing cost-effectiveness and feasibility, the bill could help prevent increases in consumer expenses, thus maintaining affordability.
However, the vague language could also lead to regulatory uncertainty, which might complicate the appliance market. Without clear definitions, the interpretation and enforcement of the law might vary, generating inconsistency and potential confusion among both consumers and manufacturers.
Impact on Stakeholders
For consumers, the bill's intent to prevent increased costs is a clear positive. However, the lack of clarity in the bill might leave consumers vulnerable to legal interpretations that might not align with the bill's protective intent.
Manufacturers might face challenges due to the undefined terms, which could lead to inconsistent requirements and potential legal disputes. Smaller manufacturers, who might have less capacity to absorb regulatory changes, could be disproportionately impacted if the interpretations of what is "economically justified" and "technologically feasible" are not resolved clearly.
Overall, while the bill seeks to create a consumer-friendly marketplace for dishwashers with fair energy standards, its ambiguous language and exemptions in the legislative text risk undermining its effectiveness and could create hurdles for all stakeholders involved.
Issues
The bill lacks specific definitions for terms such as 'technologically feasible,' 'economically justified,' and 'significant conservation of energy' in Section 2. This vagueness could lead to interpretation disputes and regulatory challenges, potentially impacting both manufacturers and consumers.
The phrase 'not likely to result in additional net costs to the consumer' in Section 2 is vague. Without clear criteria for evaluating net costs, there could be differing interpretations, leading to legal and political disputes regarding consumer protection and cost implications.
The exemption of subsections (m), (n), and (o) without explanation in Section 2 creates ambiguity and reduces transparency, raising questions about the legislative intent and potential overrides of existing laws or protections.
The bill's title, the 'Stop Unaffordable Dishwasher Standards Act,' may not adequately convey the specific purpose or scope of the legislation. This can lead to confusion or misinterpretation among stakeholders about its objectives and impacts.
There is a lack of information on financial implications, potential beneficiaries, or specific actions addressed within either section, limiting the ability to assess the bill's impact on spending or favoritism, especially concerning larger manufacturers versus smaller ones.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of this act states that it will be officially known as the "Stop Unaffordable Dishwasher Standards Act."
2. Prescribing and enforcing energy conservation standards for dishwashers Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section states that the Secretary of Energy cannot set or enforce new energy conservation standards for dishwashers unless they are technologically feasible, economically justified, do not increase costs to consumers, and lead to significant energy savings. The terms "covered product" and "energy conservation standard" are defined according to the Energy Policy and Conservation Act.