Overview

Title

To require the heads of Federal agencies to submit to Congress an annual report regarding official time authorized under title 5, United States Code, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

H. R. 7692 is a bill that asks heads of government agencies to write a report every year, explaining how and why workers use work time to do union activities, so everyone knows how taxpayer money is spent.

Summary AI

H. R. 7692, known as the "Taxpayer-Funded Union Time Transparency Act," aims to increase transparency around the use of "official time," where federal employees conduct union activities during work hours. The bill mandates that heads of federal agencies submit and publicly post annual reports detailing various aspects of official time, including the costs, purposes, and particulars of each authorization. The reports must also include the number of hours and monetary value related to agency resources used by labor organizations and any reimbursements collected. This bill seeks to ensure accountability and clarity on how taxpayer-funded time is used in federal agencies.

Published

2024-03-15
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Introduced in House
Date: 2024-03-15
Package ID: BILLS-118hr7692ih

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
2
Words:
586
Pages:
3
Sentences:
13

Language

Nouns: 178
Verbs: 44
Adjectives: 29
Adverbs: 1
Numbers: 32
Entities: 45

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.09
Average Sentence Length:
45.08
Token Entropy:
4.68
Readability (ARI):
23.89

AnalysisAI

General Summary of the Bill

The proposed legislation, titled the "Taxpayer-Funded Union Time Transparency Act," requires the heads of Federal agencies to submit an annual report to Congress. This report will detail how much "official time" is used by employees under section 7131 of title 5, United States Code, which relates to the time authorized for labor-related activities by federal employees. The primary aim is to increase transparency in how taxpayer funds are utilized, particularly concerning activities conducted using official time.

Summary of Significant Issues

One significant issue with the bill is the lack of an explicit definition of "official time" within the proposed legislation. This could lead to varying interpretations and inconsistencies across different agencies. Another concern is the potentially burdensome administrative work required to prepare a detailed explanation for each authorization of official time, potentially leading to inefficiencies.

The requirement to report the percentage of total work hours spent as official time could complicate reporting without providing significant additional value. Furthermore, calculating the monetary value of free or discounted use of agency property might require complex evaluations that some might consider excessive.

Additionally, the bill doesn't set explicit criteria or caps for the amount of official time that can be authorized, which might lead to misuse or inconsistency among agencies. The lack of guidance on how to justify expenditures related to activities by labor organizations or individuals also poses a risk of misuse or wasteful spending.

Impact on the Public

Broadly, this bill aims to ensure accountability in government spending, which could enhance trust in public institutions by showing how resources are allocated. By requiring detailed reporting, the bill allows for greater scrutiny and public awareness of the use of taxpayer funds regarding federal employees' union activities.

However, the administrative burden on agencies might lead to increased government spending to comply with the new requirements. These costs could indirectly impact the taxpayer, effectively counterbalancing the intended transparency benefits.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

Federal Agencies and Employees

For federal agencies, the bill imposes a significant reporting responsibility, which might necessitate additional resources or staff to compile the required data. This could lead to operational challenges or reallocation of existing resources away from other priorities.

Federal employees working under union agreements might experience increased scrutiny of their activities, potentially influencing how official time is utilized. This could result in a more restricted or conservative approach to time management for labor-related activities.

Labor Organizations

Labor organizations could face limitations if the increased transparency leads agencies to reduce the authorized official time. They might need to adjust their operations to align with any adjustments or new reporting standards, possibly affecting their capacity to support federal employees effectively.

Taxpayers

For taxpayers, the bill promises enhanced oversight of federal spending on labor-related activities, providing reassurance that funds are spent responsibly. However, if the administrative costs rise significantly, the financial burden could translate into increased government spending, potentially negating some of the perceived benefits of the bill.

In summary, while the bill seeks to promote transparency and accountability, it introduces several practical challenges that might influence its effectiveness and overall impact on various stakeholders.

Issues

  • The term 'official time' is not explicitly defined within Section 2, potentially leading to ambiguity regarding its precise meaning and how it should be applied (Section 2).

  • The requirement for detailed explanation of the purpose for which the agency made each authorization of official time (Section 2(b)(2)) could be too burdensome and lead to excessive administrative work.

  • Section 2(b)(3)(C)'s requirement to report the percentage of hours spent on official time relative to total hours worked might be unnecessarily complicated and could add administrative burden without significant value.

  • Relying on complex evaluations, the requirement to report and calculate the total monetary value of uses of agency property at no cost or a discounted rate for labor organizations or employees (Section 2(b)(4)) might be excessive.

  • The lack of explicit criteria or limits for the amount of official time that can be authorized in Section 2 could lead to variance and inconsistency across agencies, potentially allowing for misuse or wasteful spending.

  • There is no clear guidance in Section 2 on how to justify expenses paid by the agency for activities by labor organizations or private individuals, leading to potential misuse or wasteful spending (Section 2(b)(7)).

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The first section of the bill states that the official name of this act is the "Taxpayer-Funded Union Time Transparency Act".

2. Official time Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

In this section, Congress requires each agency to submit an annual report detailing the costs and purposes of official time used under section 7131, including specifics about employees, hours, expenses, and any increases compared to the previous year.