Overview
Title
An Act To prohibit the Secretary of Energy from prescribing or enforcing energy conservation standards for clothes washers that are not cost-effective or technologically feasible, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
H.R. 7673 is a rule that says the person in charge of saving energy can't make new rules for washing machines unless they're good for saving energy, aren't too expensive, and people like you and me won't have to pay more money because of them.
Summary AI
H.R. 7673, also known as the "Liberty in Laundry Act," is a bill that aims to set limitations on the Secretary of Energy when it comes to setting or enforcing energy conservation standards for clothes washers. Specifically, the Secretary of Energy can only prescribe or enforce such standards if they are technologically feasible, economically justified, don't result in additional net costs to consumers, and lead to significant energy savings. The bill seeks to ensure that any new standards imposed for clothes washers are practical, cost-effective, and genuinely save energy for the benefit of consumers.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
The bill titled "Liberty in Laundry Act" seeks to regulate the authority of the Secretary of Energy concerning energy conservation standards for clothes washers. Its main focus is to ensure that any new or revised standards must be technologically feasible, economically justified, not lead to increased consumer costs, and result in significant energy savings. This legislation emerges from the desire to make sure that environmental regulations do not impose undue burdens on consumers or manufacturers, particularly in terms of cost and technological capability.
General Summary
The "Liberty in Laundry Act" aims to provide clear guidelines for the Secretary of Energy when setting energy conservation standards for clothes washers. The bill emphasizes that any new or existing standard should be technologically possible and justified in economic terms. Furthermore, it mandates that these standards should not increase costs for consumers related to purchasing, installation, or maintenance, and should result in significant energy savings. The act directly limits the Secretary’s authority unless these conditions are satisfied, thereby influencing future regulatory decisions on clothes washers.
Significant Issues
Several significant issues are present in this bill. Firstly, there is a lack of clear definitions for critical terms such as "technologically feasible" and "economically justified." Without these definitions, there is potential for varying interpretations which could lead to inconsistent application. Additionally, the bill does not specify what constitutes "significant conservation of energy," which could result in disputes or legal challenges regarding any proposed standards.
The repeated reference to specific subsections of the Energy Policy and Conservation Act without additional explanation may confuse readers, especially those without a legal background. This could make it challenging to understand how the Act’s new provisions integrate with existing regulations. The absence of a clear process or criteria for assessing the impact of standards on consumer costs further complicates potential enforcement and could lead to arbitrary decisions.
Impact on the Public
For the general public, this bill's impact could be significant in terms of both economic and environmental considerations. Consumers may benefit from protections against potential price hikes resulting from energy standards that are not economically viable. However, the implementation challenges due to vague terminology could delay or weaken energy efficiency improvements, which may have long-term environmental impacts.
Implications for Stakeholders
Consumers: The bill seems to prioritize consumer protection, ensuring that energy standards do not inadvertently increase the overall cost of owning a clothes washer. This could be beneficial for household budgets, particularly in economically sensitive groups.
Manufacturers and Retailers: Appliance manufacturers may find this law advantageous because it restricts the imposition of burdensome regulations unless clear cost-effectiveness and feasibility are demonstrated. Retailers, in turn, might see a steadier demand if product costs remain stable.
Environmental Advocates: There might be concerns from environmental groups about the potential loopholes this bill creates, potentially slowing progress towards more energy-efficient technologies due to unclear definitions and requirements in the legislation.
By creating a careful balance between economic feasibility and environmental responsibility, this bill seeks to protect consumers from undue financial burdens while still aiming to meet energy conservation goals. Yet, its vagueness on key terms poses the risk of litigation and imprecise enforcement, indicating areas that may require future amendments or clarifications.
Issues
The lack of clear definitions for key terms such as 'technologically feasible' and 'economically justified' in Section 2 could lead to subjective interpretations and inconsistent application of the bill's provisions. This ambiguity might pose legal challenges and implementation difficulties for the Secretary of Energy.
Section 2 does not define what constitutes 'significant conservation of energy.' This lack of clarity may create uncertainty regarding the energy savings necessary to justify new or revised standards, potentially leading to disputes or litigation over what is considered 'significant.'
The repeated referencing of subsections (m), (n), and (o) of section 325 of the Energy Policy and Conservation Act without clear explanation may complicate understanding for those without legal expertise. This could obscure how new mandates relate to existing frameworks, making the bill difficult to interpret.
The bill lacks a defined process or criteria for the Secretary of Energy to determine if a conservation standard will result in additional net costs to consumers, as outlined in Section 2. This omission could lead to arbitrary decision-making and financial uncertainty for consumers, potentially affecting affordability and market stability.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section states the short title of the law, which is called the “Liberty in Laundry Act.”
2. Prescribing and enforcing energy conservation standards for clothes washers Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines limitations on the Secretary of Energy regarding energy conservation standards for clothes washers. The Secretary is prohibited from setting or enforcing new standards unless they are feasible, economically justified, do not increase costs for consumers, and result in significant energy savings.