Overview

Title

An Act To prohibit the Secretary of Energy from prescribing or enforcing energy conservation standards for clothes washers that are not cost-effective or technologically feasible, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

The Liberty in Laundry Act is like a rule saying that new washing machine rules can't be put in place unless they're practical, don't cost more money, and help save a lot of energy. It makes sure new rules for washing machines are fair and helpful without making things more expensive.

Summary AI

The Liberty in Laundry Act seeks to limit the authority of the Secretary of Energy in setting and enforcing energy conservation standards for clothes washers. Under this bill, the Secretary cannot impose or enforce these standards unless they are technologically feasible, economically justified, do not increase costs for consumers, and result in significant energy savings. The Act ensures that any new standards do not burden consumers financially while still achieving meaningful energy conservation.

Published

2024-12-10
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Engrossed in House
Date: 2024-12-10
Package ID: BILLS-118hr7673eh

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
2
Words:
686
Pages:
6
Sentences:
11

Language

Nouns: 228
Verbs: 50
Adjectives: 41
Adverbs: 8
Numbers: 26
Entities: 21

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.72
Average Sentence Length:
62.36
Token Entropy:
4.50
Readability (ARI):
35.66

AnalysisAI

General Summary of the Bill

The "Liberty in Laundry Act," officially designated as H.R. 7673, seeks to regulate the Secretary of Energy's authority over energy conservation standards for clothes washers. Passed by the House of Representatives on December 10, 2024, the bill aims to ensure that any energy efficiency standards prescribed or enforced are not only technologically feasible and economically justified but also do not impose additional net costs on consumers. Additionally, the standards should result in significant energy savings to be considered valid.

Summary of Significant Issues

One of the main issues with the bill is the lack of precise definitions for critical terms such as "technologically feasible" and "economically justified." The ambiguity of these terms can lead to subjective interpretation and potential inconsistencies in enforcing the conservation standards. Similarly, the bill does not specify what constitutes "significant conservation of energy," leaving room for varying interpretations of what level of energy savings are sufficient.

Furthermore, the bill restricts the implementation of standards that result in additional net costs to consumers but fails to provide a clear method for assessing these costs. This lack of specificity may lead to inconsistent application of criteria and uneven impacts on different consumer groups. The repeated references to sections of the Energy Policy and Conservation Act without further clarification could also make the bill difficult to understand for those not familiar with the legislation, posing challenges for the general public in understanding the bill's implications.

Potential Impact on the Public

The act could potentially reduce the financial burden on consumers by preventing the implementation of expensive energy standards that do not deliver significant benefits. By focusing on feasibility and cost-effectiveness, the bill aims to ensure that any new regulation does not impose unnecessary costs on the average household.

However, the lack of clear definitions and guidelines could lead to enforcement challenges, possibly resulting in slowed improvements in energy efficiency standards. This might ultimately hamper progress in the reduction of energy consumption and its associated environmental benefits.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For consumers, particularly those with limited budgets, the act could provide a measure of protection against increased appliance costs due to new energy standards. The potential decrease in consumer expenses might help families purchase and maintain clothes washers without incurring unforeseen expenses.

Manufacturers of clothes washers might experience mixed effects. On the one hand, they could benefit from clear limitations on regulations that might otherwise increase production costs or necessitate complex redesigns. On the other hand, the ambiguity in the bill might create uncertainty, making it difficult for manufacturers to plan long-term product development and innovation strategies.

Environmental advocates may find the legislation concerning as it could slow down efforts to move toward more energy-efficient appliances. If the standards set are not stringent due to subjective interpretations of feasibility and cost-effectiveness, the broader goal of reducing energy consumption and its environmental impact might be compromised.

In summary, while the "Liberty in Laundry Act" set forth to protect consumer interests by ensuring energy efficiency standards are reasonable and economically viable, its vagueness in key areas could lead to challenges in implementation and potential setbacks in energy conservation efforts.

Issues

  • The terms 'technologically feasible' and 'economically justified' are not clearly defined in Section 2(a), leading to potential subjective interpretation and implementation challenges. This ambiguity might create inconsistency in enforcing energy conservation standards for clothes washers.

  • The phrase 'significant conservation of energy' is left undefined in Section 2(c), potentially causing confusion about what energy savings qualify as significant. This lack of clarity could lead to disputes regarding the effectiveness of proposed energy conservation standards.

  • Section 2(b) prohibits the Secretary of Energy from prescribing energy conservation standards that increase net costs to consumers, but it lacks a clear process for determining 'net costs,' which might lead to inconsistent criteria application, affecting fairness and transparency.

  • The repeated reference to subsections of the Energy Policy and Conservation Act (Section 325) in Section 2 could complicate understanding for those without legal expertise, potentially posing accessibility issues for the general public seeking to comprehend the act’s provisions.

  • The bill lacks a detailed framework for how amendments to existing standards or new prescriptions should consider varying consumer and market characteristics in assessing net costs, as noted in Section 2(b). This could disadvantage certain consumer groups if market variations aren't adequately considered.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The first section states the short title of the law, which is called the “Liberty in Laundry Act.”

2. Prescribing and enforcing energy conservation standards for clothes washers Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section outlines limitations on the Secretary of Energy regarding energy conservation standards for clothes washers. The Secretary is prohibited from setting or enforcing new standards unless they are feasible, economically justified, do not increase costs for consumers, and result in significant energy savings.