Overview

Title

To amend title 40, United States Code, to include Indian Tribes among entities that may receive Federal surplus real property for certain purposes, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

The bill wants to let Native American Tribes have the chance to get old government buildings and lands that the government doesn't need anymore, just like states can. It also plans to make sure that the Tribes know when these properties are available and have a fair shot at them.

Summary AI

The bill, H.R. 7663, known as the “GSA Disposal Process Tribal Parity Act of 2024,” aims to include Indian Tribes among the entities eligible to receive surplus federal real property. It modifies multiple sections of the United States Code to ensure that Indian Tribes are given the same opportunities as States to receive federal properties that are unused or underused. The bill also mandates an annual report on outreach to Indian Tribes about available surplus properties and establishes a process for handling competing applications from different entities for these properties.

Published

2024-03-13
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Introduced in House
Date: 2024-03-13
Package ID: BILLS-118hr7663ih

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
3
Words:
1,314
Pages:
7
Sentences:
17

Language

Nouns: 379
Verbs: 88
Adjectives: 53
Adverbs: 10
Numbers: 77
Entities: 94

Complexity

Average Token Length:
3.92
Average Sentence Length:
77.29
Token Entropy:
4.69
Readability (ARI):
38.76

AnalysisAI

General Summary of the Bill

H.R. 7663, titled the "GSA Disposal Process Tribal Parity Act of 2024," proposes amendments to title 40 of the United States Code, aiming to include Indian Tribes alongside states in processes related to acquiring surplus federal real property. The bill expands the eligibility of Indian Tribes to receive federal surplus property for a variety of purposes, such as law enforcement, emergency management, airport and port facility development, homelessness assistance, and wildlife conservation. It also mandates that the Administrator of General Services annually report to Congress on outreach efforts to Indian Tribes and establishes a process for handling competing applications for this property from states, their subdivisions, municipalities, and Indian Tribes.

Summary of Significant Issues

One salient issue within the bill is its consistent redefinition of the term "State" across multiple sections without any changes, leading to redundancy and potential confusion. Furthermore, the bill's requirement to examine multiple external references, like the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act, could inconvenience those without immediate access to those documents, complicating the bill's interpretation for some stakeholders.

Moreover, the extensive amendments to various sections of U.S. law may render it challenging to track changes accurately without reviewing each referenced section individually. The expectations for the timely submission of reports under the proposed legislation may not consider potential bureaucratic delays, leading to practical difficulties in adherence to deadlines. Lastly, the establishment of a process for managing competing applications for surplus property is flagged as potentially contentious, particularly if transparency and predefined evaluation criteria are not prioritized.

Impact on the Public Broadly

The inclusion of Indian Tribes as eligible recipients of federal surplus property extends new opportunities and resources to these communities, potentially enhancing their capacity to develop infrastructure, improve public welfare and safety, and address specific local needs. For the general public, this shift could mean more effective use of federal surplus property, potentially resulting in strengthened local economies and improved community services due to more equitable resource distribution.

However, the administrative requirements and potential complexities introduced by the bill could result in inefficiencies if government entities cannot implement the changes smoothly. Moreover, any perceived mismanagement of application processes could lead to disputes and concerns over fair access to these federal resources.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For Indian Tribes, the bill is a promising development, granting them new avenues to acquire and repurpose federal property for important local initiatives, potentially impacting tribal economic growth positively and promoting self-sufficiency. While this enhances opportunities, it also entails responsibilities to manage these assets effectively in alignment with the stipulated purposes.

State governments and other traditional entities that have historically accessed such surplus property may need to adapt to this newly competitive landscape. The establishment of processes to fairly manage competing applications may alleviate friction, but it also introduces a level of uncertainty and potential for intergovernmental conflict.

Overall, while the bill aims to enhance parity and equitable distribution of resources, its successful implementation will depend on clear guidelines, effective communication, and cooperative efforts between federal, state, and tribal entities. These factors will determine whether the positive impacts are realized and any negative repercussions minimized.

Issues

  • The consistent redefinition of the term 'State' across multiple sections without any modification creates redundancy and confusion. This affects the understanding of Sections 2(a), 2(b), and 2(c).

  • The amendments made to multiple sections of the U.S. Code could make it difficult to track changes and understand their full impact without reviewing each referenced section individually. This is a concern in Section 2.

  • Frequent references to definitions outside the document, such as those in the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act, can cause difficulties for anyone without immediate access to those documents. This is particularly relevant in Section 2 and Section 3.

  • The timeline for report submission and establishment of the competing applications process may not account for potential bureaucratic delays, potentially leading to issues meeting specified deadlines. This issue is mentioned in Section 3.

  • The requirement to submit annual reports may lead to an administrative burden without specified outcomes or benchmarks for success. This issue is found in Section 3.

  • The document lacks specificity in how the amended sections will be implemented in practice, potentially leading to inconsistent application across different jurisdictions, as highlighted in Sections 2 and 3.

  • The process for managing competing applications could result in conflicts or perceived favoritism if it is not transparently defined and previously stated criteria for evaluation are not included. This issue is found in Section 3.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

This section gives the short title of the Act, which is the “GSA Disposal Process Tribal Parity Act of 2024”.

2. Inclusion of Indian Tribes in GSA disposal processes Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section outlined in the United States Congressional bill amends various parts of U.S. Code to include Indian Tribes alongside states in processes related to the disposal and transfer of federal real property. This would apply to purposes such as law enforcement, emergency management, port facility development, homelessness assistance, airport public functions, and wildlife conservation.

3. Annual report on outreach to Indian Tribes; competing applications Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section outlines the roles of the Administrator of General Services in reporting and managing surplus Federal real property. It requires the Administrator to annually report to Congress on efforts to inform Indian Tribes about available surplus properties and mandates a process to handle applications from various entities, including Indian Tribes, for these surplus properties.