Overview
Title
To amend the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 respecting the scoring of preventive health savings.
ELI5 AI
The H.R. 766 bill wants to let a special person who checks government money decide if new health ideas can save money in the future by stopping people from getting sick. But these money savings ideas are just for looking at and can't change budget rules.
Summary AI
H.R. 766, also known as the “Dr. Michael C. Burgess Preventive Health Savings Act,” aims to amend the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974. The bill proposes a new method for evaluating proposed legislation by allowing the Director of the Congressional Budget Office to determine if such legislation would result in savings through preventive health care. If savings are identified, these estimates can be included in budget projections, but they cannot be used to meet budgetary rules or limits. The bill defines "preventive health care" as actions to maintain health and prevent illness using proven interventions.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
Overview of the Bill
The bill titled "Dr. Michael C. Burgess Preventive Health Savings Act" proposes amendments to the Congressional Budget Act of 1974, with a focus on the scoring of preventive health savings. Essentially, the bill seeks to establish a framework within which the potential long-term financial benefits of preventive healthcare measures could be evaluated in terms of budget savings. The goal is to enable Congress to consider the future impact of health measures that prevent illness and reduce healthcare costs when reviewing legislation.
Significant Issues
The first notable challenge arises from the broad language in Section 2, specifically regarding what qualifies as "effective, innovative health care interventions" and the definition of "credible and publicly available evidence." Such broad terms could invite varying interpretations, potentially leading to misuse or subjective interpretations designed to support specific agendas.
Furthermore, the concept of "budgetary outyears," defined as two consecutive 10-year periods, introduces a layer of uncertainty. Forecasting budget impacts so far into the future is inherently speculative, given the rapid pace of medical and technological advancements and the volatility of economic conditions.
Additionally, the bill establishes that the estimates created by the Director on potential budget savings are supplementary and not used for ensuring compliance with existing budget controls. This could diminish oversight and accountability, as these estimates might lack transparency and concrete enforcement mechanisms.
Lastly, the bill does not provide a clear methodology or criteria for how the Director should assess whether a proposed bill will achieve net reductions in budget outlays. This omission creates room for subjective decision-making, which could lead to inconsistent application of the law.
Impact on the Public
If successfully implemented, the bill could promote legislation that values preventive health measures, potentially leading to a healthier population and decreased long-term healthcare costs. The public could benefit from healthcare policies that emphasize wellness and disease prevention, potentially resulting in reduced insurance premiums and healthcare expenses over time.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Healthcare providers and insurance companies could experience significant impacts from this bill. If preventive measures are emphasized and effectively implemented, healthcare providers might see shifts in service demand, with a possible increase in preventive care services and reduction in costly emergency or chronic care treatments. Insurance companies might benefit from more predictable long-term savings, which could influence premium calculations and offer new opportunities for competitive pricing strategies.
On the other hand, policymakers and budget analysts face challenges due to the speculative nature of the long-term projections required by the bill. They may struggle to balance current fiscal responsibilities with future savings predictions that are uncertain and reliant on evolving healthcare trends. Additionally, there might be concerns regarding how these projections integrate with established budget enforcement mechanisms, potentially affecting fiscal policy and spending priorities in unpredictable ways.
In conclusion, while the bill aims to incentivize preventive health initiatives and their fiscal impact, its broad language and focus on long-term outcomes present challenges to its straightforward application and could impact various stakeholders differently.
Issues
The broad language used in Section 2 regarding 'preventive health care' could result in varying interpretations of what constitutes 'effective, innovative health care interventions' and 'credible and publicly available evidence.' This ambiguity may lead to inconsistent application or manipulation to fit particular agendas, impacting the fairness and transparency of the legislation.
In Section 2, the term 'budgetary outyears' refers to two consecutive 10-year periods far into the future, making long-term savings projections speculative and uncertain. This could lead to inaccurate financial assessments and affect future budgeting decisions.
According to Section 2, the estimates made by the Director are supplementary and not used for determining compliance with existing budgetary enforcement controls. This could potentially limit the accountability and oversight of these calculations, reducing transparency in budget planning.
Section 2 lacks a clear mechanism or criteria for how the Director determines whether proposed legislation will result in net reductions in budget outlays. This absence of detail raises concerns about the potential for subjective interpretations and inconsistent policy application.
The reliance on long-term projections in Section 2 for predicting reduced budget outlays might not adequately account for unforeseen healthcare developments or economic conditions, affecting the accuracy of these projections and their policy implications.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the bill is titled the "Dr. Michael C. Burgess Preventive Health Savings Act," which serves as the official name for this legislative act.
2. Scoring of preventive health savings Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section amends the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974 to allow Congress to evaluate if proposed laws can save money long-term by using preventive health care. It requires the Director to assess the potential budget savings and provide estimates, although these estimates can't be used to enforce budget rules.