Overview

Title

To authorize and amend authorities, programs, and statutes administered by the Coast Guard.

ELI5 AI

The bill is about giving money and new instructions to the Coast Guard so they can buy new equipment and train their people to do their jobs better, like keeping ships safe and protecting the ocean. But some people are worried that they're getting a lot of money without clear reasons, and there might not be enough rules to make sure the money is used properly.

Summary AI

The H. R. 7659 bill, known as the "Coast Guard Authorization Act of 2024," aims to provide funding and authority updates for the United States Coast Guard. It specifies budget allocations for Coast Guard programs, installations, and equipment for fiscal years 2025 and 2026, and outlines several initiatives to improve Coast Guard training, recruiting, and operational efficiency. The bill includes directives on vessel and shipping safety, personnel management, and the modernization of the Coast Guard’s infrastructure and technology systems. Additionally, it proposes amendments to existing laws concerning merchant mariner credentials and vessel operations to enhance maritime safety and environmental protection.

Published

2024-03-13
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Introduced in House
Date: 2024-03-13
Package ID: BILLS-118hr7659ih

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
96
Words:
25,989
Pages:
123
Sentences:
558

Language

Nouns: 7,830
Verbs: 1,825
Adjectives: 1,082
Adverbs: 166
Numbers: 1,472
Entities: 1,732

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.20
Average Sentence Length:
46.58
Token Entropy:
5.70
Readability (ARI):
24.99

AnalysisAI

The "Coast Guard Authorization Act of 2024" seeks to amend various statutes and authorize appropriations for the United States Coast Guard. Introduced to enhance the operational capabilities, infrastructure, and personnel policies of the Coast Guard, the Act encompasses a wide array of provisions from funding allocations to specific operational mandates.

General Summary of the Bill

The bill, titled "Coast Guard Authorization Act of 2024," aims to authorize funds and amend specific authorities, programs, and statutes that govern the United States Coast Guard. The Act includes provisions to increase financial appropriations for fiscal years 2025 and 2026, extend service life programs, establish policies for personnel management, and improve partnerships and transparency in operations. It addresses safety measures, especially in areas like shipping and navigation, while setting new protocols for managing unmanned systems and enhancing technological infrastructure. Further, the bill involves various amendments to the United States Code concerning merchant marine credentials, vessel safety, oil pollution liabilities, and other operational requirements.

Summary of Significant Issues

  1. Transparency and Justification for Increased Appropriations: The bill significantly increases appropriations for fiscal years 2025 and 2026 without clear justifications, which raises concerns about financial oversight and potential misuse of funds.

  2. Lack of Detailed Processes and Criteria: Some provisions, such as those related to tsunami evacuation plans and service life extension programs, lack explicit criteria or funding sources, leading to potential inefficiencies and safety concerns.

  3. Complexity of Legal Language: Several sections are written with complex legal language, which could limit the understanding and engagement of stakeholders, particularly those without specialized legal or maritime knowledge.

  4. Potential Favoritism and Lack of Competitive Processes: The bill's provision for engaging nonprofit entities, especially concerning the National Coast Guard Museum, may lack transparency and expose risks of favoritism.

  5. Inconsistent Criteria for Hiring Practices: The direct hire authority allows circumvention of standard hiring processes without clear criteria, leading to potential fairness and transparency issues.

  6. Authority Delegation Without Clear Guidelines: The delegation of authority, particularly regarding the Great Lakes Saint Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation, is not clearly defined, raising concerns about misuse or inefficiency.

Impact on the Public

Broadly, the bill seeks to modernize and enhance the operational capabilities of the Coast Guard, potentially leading to improved maritime safety and better environmental protections. The changes could result in a more responsive and well-equipped Coast Guard, which benefits the general public by ensuring safer waterways and protection against maritime threats. However, the lack of transparency in budgeting and delegation could lead to public distrust if perceived as wasteful or unfairly administered.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For Coast Guard personnel, the bill could mean improved facilities, clearer operational guidelines, and enhanced career opportunities through revised personnel policies. Stakeholders in the maritime sector, including shipping and oil companies, might experience stricter regulations, especially concerning safety and environmental responsibilities. Nonprofit organizations and regional development agencies might benefit from the opportunities to partner with the Coast Guard, though concerns about the fairness of such partnerships remain. Additionally, the local communities near Coast Guard facilities and operations might see the economic benefits of increased investment in infrastructure, though this comes with concerns about how funds are allocated and used.

In conclusion, while the "Coast Guard Authorization Act of 2024" introduces initiatives aimed at strengthening the Coast Guard, the issues highlighted necessitate careful consideration to ensure equitable and effective implementation that truly serves the public interest.

Financial Assessment

The Coast Guard Authorization Act of 2024, designated as H. R. 7659, outlines several financial appropriations aimed at enhancing the capabilities and infrastructure of the United States Coast Guard. The bill details specific funding for fiscal years 2025 and 2026 and highlights various expenditures for infrastructure and equipment acquisitions.

Summary of Financial Allocations

The bill authorizes significant financial allocations across multiple sections, primarily focusing on Coast Guard infrastructure, equipment, and personnel. Some key financial references include:

  • Section 101 details the authorization of appropriations for fiscal years 2025 and 2026, replacing amounts specified for the previous fiscal years. The authorized amounts are $11,287,500,000 for fiscal year 2025 and $11,851,875,000 for fiscal year 2026.

  • Section 102 allocates $36,300,000 annually for 2025 and 2026 to modernize the Coast Guard's information technology systems, with specific funding dedicated to the Merchant Mariner credentialing program. Additionally, this section allocates $500,000,000 for 2025 and $600,000,000 for 2026 for shoreside infrastructure maintenance and development.

  • Section 103 outlines the acquisition and procurement funding for additional vessels and aircraft, with specified amounts such as $1,200,000,000 for a Polar Security Cutter in fiscal year 2026 and $138,500,000 for missionized aircraft in both fiscal years.

  • Section 104 discusses funding for recruiting personnel and enhancing recruiting capabilities, such as $11,978,000 for additional recruiting personnel and $9,000,000 to enhance recruiting capabilities in 2025.

  • Section 349 authorizes $6,000,000 annually for fishing vessel safety training for fiscal years 2025 and 2026.

Relation to Identified Issues

These financial allocations are not without concerns, notably regarding transparency, justification, and accountability:

  1. Transparency and Justification for Budget Increases: The bill significantly increases appropriations for fiscal years 2025 and 2026 compared to previous allocations. However, there is a lack of detailed justification provided for these increases, raising concerns about potential financial mismanagement or the necessity of such large sums. This is particularly pertinent in sections 101, 102, and 104, where substantial funds are allocated for various programs without a clear explanation of how these figures were determined or will be effectively managed.

  2. Oversight and Accountability: Sections such as 212 (regarding Polar Security Cutter updates) do not specify accountability measures if deadlines or requirements are not met. This absence can allow for cost overruns or project delays, which are significant financial concerns.

  3. Direct Hire Authorities: Sections 221 and 507 introduce direct hire authority that allows exclusion from standard hiring processes, potentially impacting budgetary transparency. There is ambiguity around what qualifies a candidate, which could lead to favoritism and financial inefficiencies.

  4. Criteria and Oversight on Spending: The option to bypass certain acquisition requirements in Sections 204 and 1138 broadens the scope for service life extensions without tightly defined limits or controls, posing a risk for inefficiencies and uncontrolled spending.

  5. Potential Privacy Concerns: While not directly related to financial allocations, the information-sharing mandates in Section 345 without specified security measures could lead to breaches that may have financial ramifications for managing and protecting sensitive data.

In summary, the Coast Guard Authorization Act of 2024 proposes substantial financial investments to enhance Coast Guard operations and infrastructure but presents challenges in ensuring transparent, justified, and accountable use of these public funds.

Issues

  • Transparency and justification for budget increases: A significant issue is the lack of detailed justification or reasoning provided for the substantial increase in appropriations in Sec. 101, which involves replacing fiscal years 2022 and 2023 amounts with those for 2025 and 2026. This raises concerns regarding budget accuracy and necessity, as well as the potential for financial mismanagement if these funds are not justified. This change spans across multiple sections, including 101, 102, and 104.

  • Oversight and accountability of Coast Guard reforms: There is a notable concern in Sec. 502 about the accountability and reporting requirements for the Coast Guard’s efforts to mitigate sexual assault and harassment. The lack of specific budgetary information and the potential for the Commandant to dismiss recommendations without a requirement for external review could lead to a lack of transparency and accountability.

  • Lack of detailed processes and criteria for Climate Impact Mitigation: Sec. 203 relates to tsunami evacuation plans but fails to specify how these plans will be funded, coordinated, or assessed for effectiveness, leading to potential safety concerns. The timeframe for execution within 15 minutes might not be feasible in all situations or locations.

  • Potential favoritism and lack of competitive processes: The amendment in Sec. 211 regarding services and contracts related to the National Coast Guard Museum potentially favoring 'the Association' without clear criteria for selecting nonprofit entities exposes risks of unfair treatment and lacks transparency.

  • Complexity and accessibility of legal language: Many sections, including those regarding manning and crew requirements (Sec. 346), licensing (Sec. 314), and the definition adjustments in Sec. 311 and Sec. 312, contain complex legal or technical language, which may impede understanding and could disenfranchise stakeholders from effectively engaging with the legislative process.

  • Inconsistent criteria for hiring practices: Sec. 221 and Sec. 507 introduce direct hire authority allowing bypass of standard hiring processes, creating potential for favoritism or lack of transparency, and there’s ambiguity in criteria for hiring 'qualified candidates'.

  • Absence of specified accountability for spending and project delivery, such as for Polar Security Cutter updates in Sec. 212, which lacks accountability measures in case deadlines or requirements are not met, and unclear criteria for 'significant' changes that could allow for cost overruns or delays.

  • Lack of criteria or oversight in service life extension programs: Mentioned in Sec. 204 and Sec. 1138, the broad definitions and exemptions from Level 1 or Level 2 acquisition requirements could lead to inefficiencies or wasteful spending without clear financial limits or controls.

  • Authority delegation without clear guidelines: Particularly in Sec. 215 and Sec. 70032, authority is delegated to the Great Lakes Saint Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation without clear guidelines, increasing potential for misuse or inefficiencies.

  • Potential privacy issues in information sharing mandates: Sec. 345 mentions data provided by the Coast Guard but lacks specified security measures, posing risks of privacy or information breaches.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title; table of contents Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The “Coast Guard Authorization Act of 2024” includes several sections that outline the authorization of appropriations, structural and personnel changes within the Coast Guard, regulations for shipping and navigation, as well as liability for oil pollution incidents. The Act also mandates improvements in accountability and transparency for the Coast Guard, including oversight and reforms to enhance safety and efficiency in various maritime operations.

2. Commandant defined Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

In this Act, the term “Commandant” refers to the leader of the Coast Guard.

101. Authorization of appropriations Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section amends appropriations for various fiscal years, updating the financial allocations for fiscal years 2025 and 2026 in several categories, such as general budgets, retirement pay, and other specific military-related expenses. The changes include increases in allocated amounts for those years compared to previous fiscal years.

Money References

  • Section 4902 of title 14, United States Code, is amended— (1) in the matter preceding paragraph (1) by striking “fiscal years 2022 and 2023” and inserting “fiscal years 2025 and 2026”; (2) in paragraph (1)— (A) in subparagraph (A) by striking clauses (i) and (ii) and inserting the following: “(i) $11,287,500,000 for fiscal year 2025; and “(ii) $11,851,875,000 for fiscal year 2026.”; (B) in subparagraph (B) by striking “$23,456,000” and inserting “$25,570,000”; and (C) in subparagraph (C) by striking “$24,353,000” and inserting “$26,848,500”; (3) in paragraph (2)(A) by striking clauses (i) and (ii) and inserting the following: “(i) $3,477,600,000 for fiscal year 2025; and “(ii) $3,651,480,000 for fiscal year 2026.”; (4) in paragraph (3) by striking subparagraphs (A) and (B) and inserting the following: “(A) $15,415,000 for fiscal year 2025; and “(B) $16,185,750 for fiscal year 2026.”; and (5) by striking paragraph (4) and inserting the following: “(4) For retired pay, including the payment of obligations otherwise chargeable to lapsed appropriations for purposes of retired pay, payments under the Retired Serviceman’s Family Protection Plan and the Survivor Benefit Plan, payment for career status bonuses, payment of continuation pay under section 356 of title 37, concurrent receipts, combat-related special compensation, and payments for medical care of retired personnel and their dependents under chapter 55 of title 10, $1,147,244,000 for fiscal year 2025.”. ---

102. Shoreside infrastructure and facilities and information technology Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section allocates funds for updating the Coast Guard's information technology and shoreside infrastructure for the fiscal years 2025 and 2026. For technology, $36.3 million each year is set aside, with $11 million in 2025 aimed at a new maritime credentialing system. For infrastructure, $500 million and $600 million are designated for 2025 and 2026, respectively, for improvements across various Coast Guard facilities, including training centers, academies, and bases.

Money References

  • (a) Information technology.—Of the amounts authorized to be appropriated under section 4902(2)(A) of title 14, United States Code— (1) for fiscal year 2025, $36,300,000 is authorized to modernize the Coast Guard’s information technology systems, of which $11,000,000 is authorized to fund the acquisition, development, and implementation of a new credentialing system for the Merchant Mariner credentialing program; and (2) for fiscal year 2026, $36,300,000 is authorized to modernize the Coast Guard’s information technology systems.
  • (b) Shoreside infrastructure.—Of the amounts authorized to be appropriated under section 4902(2)(A) of title 14, United States Code— (1) for fiscal year 2025, $500,000,000 is authorized to fund maintenance, construction, and repairs for Coast Guard shoreside infrastructure, of which— (A) $225,000,000 is authorized for the purposes of improvements to facilities at the United States Coast Guard Training Center Cape May in Cape May, New Jersey; (B) $10,000,000 is authorized to fund the creation of an infrastructure development plan for the Coast Guard Academy in New London, Connecticut; (C) $50,000,000 is authorized to complete repairs and improvements of Chase Hall at the Coast Guard Academy in New London, Connecticut, including remediation of asbestos, lead, and mold and upgrading the electric outlet availability and storage space in student rooms, and making changes to house not more than 2 Officer Candidates in a room; (D) $70,000,000 is authorized for the purposes of planning, designing, and building a floating drydock at the United States Coast Guard Yard in Baltimore, Maryland; (E) $40,000,000 is authorized for the purposes of planning, designing, and building a hangar to house, at a minimum, 2 HC–130J Super Hercules aircraft at Air Station Barbers Point in Kapolei, Hawaii; and (F) $90,000,000 is authorized to fund waterfront improvements of Coast Guard Base Seattle; and (2) for fiscal year 2026, $600,000,000 is authorized to fund maintenance, construction, and repairs for Coast Guard shoreside infrastructure, of which— (A) $125,000,000 is authorized for the purposes of improvements to facilities at the United States Coast Guard Training Center Cape May in Cape May, New Jersey; (B) $100,000,000 is authorized to execute the infrastructure development plan for the Coast Guard Academy in New London, Connecticut developed in paragraph (1)(C); (C) $100,000,000 is authorized for the purposes of planning, designing, and building a floating drydock at the United States Coast Guard Yard in Baltimore, Maryland; (D) $40,000,000 is authorized for the purposes of planning, designing, and building a hangar to house at a minimum 2 HC–130J Super Hercules aircraft at Air Station Barbers Point in Kapolei, Hawaii; and (E) $90,000,000 is authorized to fund waterfront improvements of Coast Guard Base Seattle.

103. Availability of amounts for acquisition of additional vessels and aircraft Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

In fiscal year 2025, $138.5 million is designated for acquiring one HC–130J Super Hercules aircraft, and $36 million for extending the life and upgrading the 47-foot Motor Life Boat. In fiscal year 2026, $1.2 billion is allocated for a Polar Security Cutter, $1.1 billion for two Offshore Patrol Cutters, $138.5 million for another HC–130J aircraft, and $153.5 million for preparing five MH–60T Jayhawk helicopters.

Money References

  • (a) Fiscal year 2025.—Of the amounts authorized to be appropriated under section 4902(2)(A) of title 14, United States Code, for fiscal year 2025— (1) $138,500,000 is authorized for the acquisition or procurement of 1 missionized HC–130J Super Hercules aircraft; and (2) $36,000,000 is authorized for the service life extension program and any necessary upgrades of the 47-foot Motor Life Boat.
  • (b) Fiscal year 2026.—Of the amounts authorized to be appropriated under section 4902(2)(A) of title 14, United States Code, for fiscal year 2026— (1) $1,200,000,000 is authorized for the acquisition of a Polar Security Cutter; (2) $1,100,000,000 is authorized for the acquisition of 2 Offshore Patrol Cutters; (3) $138,500,000 is authorized for the acquisition or procurement of 1 missionized HC–130J Super Hercules aircraft; and (4) $153,500,000 is authorized to outfit and assemble 5 MH–60T Jayhawk aircrafts.

104. Authorization for certain programs and services Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

For the fiscal years 2025 and 2026, specific amounts are allocated to enhance Coast Guard recruiting efforts and to support various directed actions for improving accountability and transparency, as outlined in a memorandum from the Commandant.

Money References

  • (a) Fiscal year 2025.—Of the amounts authorized to be appropriated under section 4902(1)(A) of title 14, United States Code, for fiscal year 2025— (1) $11,978,000 is authorized to fund additional recruiting personnel and offices for the Coast Guard Recruiting Command; (2) $9,000,000 is authorized to enhance Coast Guard recruiting capabilities; and (3) $25,000,000 is authorized for the implementation of each directed action outlined in enclosure 1 of the memorandum of the Commandant titled “Commandant’s Directed Actions-Accountability and Transparency”, dated November 27, 2023.
  • , $35,000,000 is authorized for the implementation of each directed action outlined in enclosure 1 of the memorandum of the Commandant titled “Commandant’s Directed Actions-Accountability and Transparency”, dated November 27, 2023.

105. Authorized levels of military strength and training Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section amends United States Code to update the authorized levels of military strength and training, changing the applicable fiscal years from 2022 and 2023 to 2025 and 2026.

201. Prohibition on use of lead systems integrators Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

Section 201 amends Section 1105 of title 14 of the United States Code to prohibit the use of lead systems integrators. It also defines "lead systems integrator" according to its meaning in the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006.

202. Minor construction increase Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The amendment to Section 903(d)(1) of title 14 of the United States Code increases the budget for minor construction projects from $1,500,000 to $2,000,000.

Money References

  • Section 903(d)(1) of title 14, United States Code, is amended by striking “$1,500,000” and inserting “$2,000,000”.

203. Tsunami evacuation plans Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section outlines the requirement for the Coast Guard to create specific tsunami evacuation plans for its facilities in high-risk areas, ensuring safe evacuation routes and procedures for personnel and assets within 15 minutes of detection of a seismic event. The plans must be coordinated with local governments, evaluated regularly, and a report on their effectiveness and feasibility is to be submitted to Congress within two years.

204. Service life extension programs Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The bill adds a new section to U.S. law stating that certain complex requirements do not apply to projects by the Coast Guard that are designed only to extend the usable life of equipment or systems. It defines a "service life extension program" as an investment aimed solely at prolonging the life and updating outdated parts of a specific capability or asset.

1138. Service life extension programs Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

Section 1138 explains that the Coast Guard's service life extension programs are not subject to the usual requirements for large acquisition projects. A "service life extension program" is defined as a capital investment aimed solely at prolonging the life and updating outdated parts or systems of a specific asset.

205. Maritime domain awareness in coast guard sector for Puerto Rico and Virgin Islands Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section outlines the requirement for the Commandant to submit a report to Congress about the Coast Guard's maritime domain awareness in Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands within 180 days of the Act's enactment. The report must include details about maritime traffic, illicit activities, technology used, collaboration with other entities, any awareness gaps, and the Coast Guard's needs to address these gaps, including financial and technological obstacles.

206. Public availability of information on monthly drug and migrant interdictions Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The text describes amendments to the Don Young Coast Guard Authorization Act of 2022, which moves and renumbers a section about sharing information on monthly drug and migrant interdictions. It specifies that the Commandant must publicly share details about these incidents, including the number of cases, types of drugs intercepted, and migrant interdictions, along with the Coast Guard sectors involved.

529. Public availability of information on monthly drug and migrant interdictions Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section requires that information on the number of drugs and migrants intercepted each month be made available to the public.

207. Report on establishment of unmanned systems capabilities office Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section requires the Commandant to submit a report within one year outlining plans to create an office within the Coast Guard for developing and acquiring unmanned system technologies. The report must cover strategies for managing, coordinating, and expanding these technologies, identify necessary contracting authorities, list useful commercial technologies, propose collaborations with other agencies, and describe a concept for integrating these new tools with data systems.

208. Great Lakes icebreaker Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section requires the Commandant to submit a strategy to Congress within 30 days of the Act's enactment. This strategy must explain how the Coast Guard plans to design and build a new Great Lakes icebreaker as capable as the Cutter Mackinaw within three years after receiving funding.

209. Consideration of life-cycle cost estimates for acquisition and procurement Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section amends title 46 of the United States Code to require the Secretary of the department overseeing the Coast Guard to consider life-cycle cost estimates when acquiring and procuring vessels and aircraft, ensuring these costs are taken into account during the design and evaluation processes.

1138. Consideration of life-cycle cost estimates for acquisition and procurement Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section instructs that when buying or building new ships and planes, the Coast Guard must, as much as possible, consider how much it will cost to operate and maintain them over their entire lifetime.

210. Authorization of certain support for Coast Guard Academy foundations Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section authorizes the Superintendent of the Coast Guard Academy to allow certain nonprofit foundations to use Academy facilities or equipment for free, subject to specific legal and ethical conditions, such as no liability to the U.S. government and no compromise to the integrity of Coast Guard programs. Additionally, a yearly briefing about the supported activities must be provided to relevant congressional committees, and covered foundations are defined as nonprofits supporting recruitment, development, and athletics.

1907. Authorization of certain support for Coast Guard Academy foundations Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The Superintendent of the Coast Guard Academy can allow certain approved charitable organizations to use Academy facilities or equipment for free, as long as the use meets specific conditions like legal approval and adherence to ethics rules, and it doesn't interfere with Academy duties or integrity. Each year, the Coast Guard must report to Congress about the events supported by this allowance.

211. National Coast Guard Museum Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

Section 211 amends title 14 of the United States Code to modify the roles of the Secretary in relation to the Coast Guard Museum, specifically about designing, engineering, construction administration, and quality assurance services. It also updates the leasing terms of museum properties for Coast Guard operations and allows the Commandant to obtain services for the museum from nonprofit entities or through agreements and grants with the Association.

212. Regular Polar Security Cutter updates Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section requires the Commandant to submit a detailed report to Congress on the acquisition status of the first Polar Security Cutter within 60 days of the law's enactment, including timelines, cost projections, and any potential risks. Additionally, the Commandant must provide regular briefings to Congress every 60 days about progress and notify them promptly if there are significant changes to the plan's scope or funding.

213. Technology pilot program Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The text modifies United States Code Title 14 by increasing the number from "2" to "4" in a particular section related to a technology pilot program.

214. Report on condition of Missouri River dayboards Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section requires the Commandant to submit a report to the relevant congressional committees within 180 days of the Act's enactment, detailing the condition of Missouri River dayboards and buoy placements. The report must include the last service date for each dayboard and buoy, a systematic service plan by the Coast Guard, and contact points.

215. Delegation of ports and waterways safety authorities in St. Lawrence seaway Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section outlines that, generally, only the Great Lakes Saint Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation can be given authority over the Saint Lawrence Seaway by the Secretary. However, in special circumstances, the Secretary or the Coast Guard, after consulting with the Secretary of Transportation, can enforce orders, establish safety zones, and take security actions to protect the area.

70032. Saint Lawrence Seaway Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section outlines the delegation of authority concerning the Saint Lawrence Seaway, stating that the Secretary's powers related to the Seaway cannot be transferred to any agency except the Great Lakes Saint Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation. However, in certain situations, the Secretary or the head of another agency, after consulting with the Secretary of Transportation, can issue special orders, establish safety zones, and take security measures for ports and facilities.

216. Adjustment of liability limits for natural gas deepwater ports Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section allows the Secretary to lower the liability limits for certain deepwater ports if they are considered to have a lower risk of oil pollution. It outlines factors the Secretary must consider in making this determination and sets minimum liability limits for ports involved in transporting oil and natural gas.

Money References

  • “(C) AMOUNT OF LIABILITY LIMIT.—In lowering the limit of liability for a class or category of deepwater port under this paragraph, the Secretary may establish a limit of liability of— “(i) not less than $50,000,000 for deepwater ports used in connection with the transportation of oil; and “(ii) not less than $1,000,000 for deepwater ports used in connection with the transportation of natural gas.”.

217. Study on Coast Guard missions Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section outlines a study tasked to a federally funded research center to evaluate the Coast Guard's capabilities to perform its duties and fulfill its missions. The study will provide recommendations for improving the Coast Guard's efficiency, including potential transfers of responsibilities to other agencies, with a follow-up assessment from the Commandant, who will report these findings and recommendations to Congress.

221. Direct hire authority for civilian faculty at the Coast Guard Academy Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section amends U.S. law to allow the Secretary of the Coast Guard more flexibility in hiring faculty at the Coast Guard Academy by enabling them to appoint highly qualified candidates directly and without the usual competitive process required by other federal hiring rules.

222. Temporary exemption from authorized end strength for Coast Guard enlisted members on active duty Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The Coast Guard is allowed to have a higher percentage of its enlisted members in the senior pay grades E–8 and E–9 on active duty until October 1, 2027, as an exception to existing law.

223. Additional available guidance and considerations for reserve selection boards Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

Section 223 of the bill amends a part of the United States Code to update a reference, changing it from "section 2117" to "sections 2115 and 2117," which affects the guidance available for reserve selection boards.

224. Parental leave parity for members of certain reserve components of Coast Guard Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section introduces a new rule that allows certain reserve members of the Coast Guard to take up to 12 periods of parental leave within one year after a child is born, adopted, or placed for adoption or foster care. If a member cannot use this leave within a year due to specific circumstances like operational duties, they may be allowed an extension to use the leave later.

2907. Parental leave for members of certain reserve components of Coast Guard Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section provides that eligible reserve members of the Coast Guard may receive up to 12 training periods as parental leave within one year of events like the birth or adoption of a child. If operational or educational duties prevent using the leave within a year, an extension may be granted to use it later.

225. Authorization for maternity uniform allowance for officers Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section allows the Coast Guard to give pregnant officers a cash allowance to buy maternity uniform items if these are not provided. The amount of the allowance is decided by the Secretary of the department overseeing the Coast Guard.

226. Modification to career intermission program Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The modifications to the career intermission program include changing the minimum break period from two months to one month, and ensuring that members and their survivors are entitled to death benefits, travel allowances for burial ceremonies, and general benefits.

227. Report on GAO recommendations on housing program Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section requires the Commandant to submit a report within one year of the act's enactment to two specific congressional committees. This report will detail how the Coast Guard is addressing recommendations from a Government Accountability Office report on improving Coast Guard housing programs.

301. Definitions Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

In this section, the outer Continental Shelf is defined according to the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act. A ruling letter is explained as a type of letter related to the Jones Act, provided by U.S. Customs and Border Protection. Lastly, the Secretary refers to the Secretary of Homeland Security, specifically acting through the U.S. Customs and Border Protection.

302. Notification Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

Prior to conducting activities on the outer Continental Shelf, foreign vessel operators must notify the Secretary about their planned operations. The Secretary then has 14 days to publish this notification, excluding any confidential details, in the Customs Bulletin and Decisions.

303. Publication of fines and penalties Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The bill requires the Secretary of Homeland Security to publish pre-penalty notices or penalty notifications on vessel-related fines in the Customs Bulletin within 14 days of issuance. The publication must include details about the vessel and its owner, the penalty amount, and a summary of the alleged misconduct. Additionally, the Secretary must create regulations within 90 days to support these changes.

311. Revising merchant mariner deck training requirements Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section revises various rules related to merchant mariner credentials, such as redefining classes and requirements for deck departments, adjusting service period lengths, and modifying training standards, while directing the Secretary of the department where the Coast Guard operates to implement changes without certain regulatory processes.

7306. General requirements and classifications for members of deck departments Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section allows the Secretary to issue different types of credentials to members of ship deck departments, categorizing them based on factors like vessel size, type, and areas they operate in. The Secretary can consider factors such as age, character, experience, and physical condition when issuing these credentials.

312. Amendments Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section amends various parts of title 46 in the United States Code by replacing the term “seamen” with “seafarers” wherever it appears, updating the language to reflect this change in different sections and analyses related to maritime credentials and certifications.

313. Renewal of merchant mariner licenses and documents Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

Section 7507 of title 46, United States Code, is updated to clarify that when a merchant mariner renews their credential, the renewed credential will start the day after the old one expires, as long as it's not an extension under the specified earlier subsections.

314. Merchant seamen licenses, certificates, and documents; manning of vessels Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section amends various parts of title 46 of the United States Code to include noncitizen nationals, in addition to citizens, in requirements for merchant seamen licenses, certificates, and maritime documents. It also defines "noncitizen national" as someone described in the Immigration and Nationality Act and ensures vessels can be commanded and certified by noncitizen nationals.

321. Grossly negligent operations of a vessel Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section outlines that operating a vessel in a grossly negligent way can lead to severe legal consequences. If someone operates a vessel negligently and puts others at risk, they commit a class A misdemeanor, but if serious injuries occur, it becomes a class E felony, with a possible fine up to $35,000.

Money References

  • “(2) FELONY.—A person operating a vessel in a grossly negligent manner that results in serious bodily injury, as defined in section 1365(h)(3) of title 18— “(A) commits a class E felony; and “(B) may be assessed a civil penalty of not more than $35,000.”.

322. Administrative procedure for security risks Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The text outlines changes to the United States Code about security risks on vessels. It updates legal language to specify circumstances under which an individual can be considered a security risk, such as having probable cause to believe they violated company policy and pose a threat to others on the vessel.

323. Requirements for DUKW amphibious passenger vessels Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section updates the requirements for amphibious passenger vessels by changing terminology from "DUKW" to "commercial amphibious small passenger vessels." It also modifies definitions and clarifies that these rules apply to small amphibious passenger vessels under U.S. jurisdiction.

324. Risk-based examination of tank vessels Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section amends title 46, section 3714 of the United States Code to allow the Secretary, with certain conditions met, to use a risk-based schedule for examining foreign-flagged tank vessels instead of the usual annual examinations, ensuring the same level of safety. Before adopting this new schedule, a study and assessment must be reviewed and reported to Congressional committees.

325. Ports and waterways safety Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section updates existing law to improve the safety of ports and waterways. It includes cyber incidents, organized crime, and foreign state threats as potential risks and strengthens regulations to address these threats during national emergencies. Additionally, it prevents individuals from countries supporting terrorism from visiting certain secure facilities.

326. Study on Bering Strait vessel traffic projections and emergency response posture at the port of Point Spencer, Alaska Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section mandates a study by the National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine to analyze the growth of commercial vessel traffic through the Bering Strait and assess emergency response capabilities at the Port of Point Spencer, Alaska. It includes consulting with various agencies and organizations to evaluate risks, support maritime emergency response, and recommend practical actions for improving infrastructure and safety in the region.

327. Underwater inspections brief Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section requires the Commandant or a designated individual to brief certain Congressional committees within 30 days of the new law's enactment. The briefing will cover the program for underwater inspections instead of using dry docks, as described in the specified federal regulations.

328. St. Lucie River railroad bridge Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The Commandant is required to carry out an independent study of boat traffic at mile 7.4 of the St. Lucie River before making a final decision regarding Docket Number USCG–2022–0222, which concerns the St. Lucie River railroad bridge.

329. Rulemaking regarding port access routes Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section requires the Secretary overseeing the Coast Guard to finalize new rules about shipping routes along the Atlantic Coast. These rules must be issued within 180 days and are based on a previous study and announcement made in June 2020.

341. Anchor handling activities Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

Section 341 of the bill updates existing laws about anchor handling activities to include new types of facilities and vessels involved in energy production and space exploration. It defines an "energy production or transmission facility" as a floating offshore facility that is not a vessel, securely attached to the seabed, and equipped with wind turbines for producing renewable energy.

342. Establishment of National Advisory Committee on Autonomous Maritime Systems Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The text establishes a National Advisory Committee on Autonomous Maritime Systems, which will advise on regulating and using autonomous systems in U.S. waters. The committee will have 9 members with expertise in relevant areas, and represent diverse groups including marine safety, vessel design, and academic institutions.

15110. Establishment of National Advisory Committee on Autonomous Maritime Systems Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section establishes a National Advisory Committee on Autonomous Maritime Systems, which will provide advice on how autonomous systems should be regulated and used in U.S. waters. The Committee will have 9 members, each having expertise in areas like maritime safety, vessel design, unmanned vehicles, port operations, and other related fields.

343. Controlled substance onboard vessels Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section of the bill updates the United States Code to clarify that it is illegal for any individual on a covered vessel to manufacture, distribute, or possess with intent to manufacture or distribute a controlled substance. It also specifies that these actions are covered by the Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act.

344. Nonoperating individual Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section amends the William M. (Mac) Thornberry National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021 to extend the timeline from 2025 to 2027.

345. Information on type approval certificates Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section requires the Commandant of the Coast Guard to supply data related to water quality and biological organisms from ballast water management systems with a type approval certificate to any State, the District of Columbia, or U.S. territories upon request. This amendment is part of the Frank LoBiondo Coast Guard Authorization Act of 2018.

904. Information on type approval certificates Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The Commandant of the Coast Guard is required to share data about water quality and biological organism concentrations related to ballast water management systems, when requested by any U.S. state or territory, including Washington D.C. This data must pertain to systems with a type approval certificate as per the regulations in the Code of Federal Regulations.

346. Manning and crewing requirements for certain vessels, vehicles, and structures Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The bill section allows the Secretary of the department in which the Coast Guard operates to offer temporary exemptions from standard crew and manning regulations for certain foreign-owned vessels and offshore structures, provided specific conditions are met, such as having approved U.S. citizens or lawful residents as crew. The Secretary can revoke exemptions if conditions are violated and can impose fines for non-compliance, and an annual report detailing these exemptions must be submitted to Congress.

Money References

  • “(g) Penalty.—In addition to revocation under subsection (e), the Secretary may impose on the owner or operator of a covered facility a civil penalty of $10,000 per day for each day the covered facility— “(1) is manned or crewed in violation of an exemption under this subsection; or “(2) operated under an exemption under this subsection that the Secretary determines was not validly obtained. “

8109. Exemptions from manning and crew requirements Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section allows the Secretary of the department where the Coast Guard operates to give certain exemptions from manning and crew requirements for vessels mainly owned or controlled by a foreign nation. These exemptions require individuals crewing the vessel to be U.S. citizens, legal U.S. residents, or citizens of the registering nation, with strict limits and the possibility of revocation, penalties, and periodic inspections to ensure compliance.

Money References

  • , the Secretary may impose on the owner or operator of a covered facility a civil penalty of $10,000 per day for each day the covered facility— (1) is manned or crewed in violation of an exemption under this subsection; or (2) operated under an exemption under this subsection that the Secretary determines was not validly obtained.

347. Classification societies Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The proposed amendment to section 3316(d) of title 46 of the United States Code clarifies that foreign classification societies must meet specific delegation criteria by their home government and explicitly states that the Secretary cannot delegate authority to any classification society from the People’s Republic of China.

348. Authority to establish safety zones for special activities in exclusive economic zone Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section grants the Secretary of the department overseeing the Coast Guard the power to create safety zones in the exclusive economic zone for activities like space launches and offshore energy projects. These safety zones restrict access for safety or environmental reasons and can be around moving vessels or stationary areas.

70037. Special activities in exclusive economic zone Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The Secretary of the department overseeing the Coast Guard can establish special safety zones in the exclusive economic zone to manage certain activities. These activities include space-related activities by U.S. citizens and offshore energy developments near fixed platforms.

349. Fishing vessel and fisherman training safety Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

Section 349 of the bill amends the United States Code to enhance safety and health training for fishing vessel operators and crew. It increases funding for these programs to $6 million per year for 2025 and 2026 and changes how training criteria are developed in consultation with the Coast Guard.

Money References

  • SEC. 349.Fishing vessel and fisherman training safety. Section 4502 of title 46, United States Code, is amended— (1) in subsection (i)— (A) in paragraph (1)— (i) in subparagraph (A)(ii) by striking “; and” and inserting a semicolon; (ii) by redesignating subparagraph (B) as subparagraph (C); and (iii) by inserting after subparagraph (A) the following: “(B) to conduct safety and prevention training that addresses behavioral and physical health risks, to include substance use disorder and worker fatigue, facing fishing vessel operators and crewmembers; and”; (B) in paragraph (2)— (i) by striking “, in consultation with and based on criteria established by the Commandant of the Coast Guard”; and (ii) by striking “subsection on a competitive basis” and inserting the following: “subsection— “(A) on a competitive basis; and “(B) based on criteria developed in consultation with the Commandant of the Coast Guard.”; and (C) in paragraph (4) by striking “$3,000,000 for fiscal year 2023” and inserting “to the Secretary of Health and Human Services $6,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2025 and 2026”; and (2) in subsection (j)— (A) in paragraph (1) by inserting “, and understanding and mitigating behavioral and physical health risks, to include substance use disorder and worker fatigue, facing members of the commercial fishing industry” after “weather detection”; (B) in paragraph (2)— (i) by striking “, in consultation with and based on criteria established by the Commandant of the Coast Guard,”; and (ii) by striking “subsection on a competitive basis” and inserting the following: “subsection— “(A) on a competitive basis; and “(B) based on criteria developed in consultation with the Commandant of the Coast Guard.”; and (C) in paragraph (4) by striking “$3,000,000 for fiscal year 2023” and inserting “to the Secretary of Health and Human Services $6,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2025 and 2026”. ---

350. Authority over Deepwater Port Act of 1974 Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section amends parts of the Deepwater Port Act of 1974 to grant the Secretary of Transportation exclusive authority to issue regulations under the Act, work with other federal agencies on environmental reviews, and take over some responsibilities from the Coast Guard, except for navigational safety. Additionally, these changes do not affect any applications submitted before the Act's enactment or limit the authority of other agencies.

351. National Offshore Safety Advisory Committee composition Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The amendment to Section 15106(c) of title 46 in the U.S. Code increases the number of members on the National Offshore Safety Advisory Committee from 15 to 17. Additionally, it specifies that 2 of the members should represent organizations involved in non-mineral energy activities on the Outer Continental Shelf.

352. Improving Vessel Traffic Service monitoring Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section focuses on improving Vessel Traffic Service monitoring by requiring the Commandant to implement a restructuring plan for anchorages in San Pedro Bay, conduct a study on the proximity of anchorage grounds to pipelines, and submit a report to Congress. Additionally, it mandates the introduction of audible and visual alarms to alert when vessels are too close to pipelines and the development of notification procedures for potential pipeline incursions, along with annual reporting to Congress on these measures.

353. Abandoned and derelict vessel removals Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The bill modifies Chapter 47 of Title 46 in the United States Code to include regulations for removing abandoned and derelict vessels, excluding barges, in U.S. waters. It outlines the process for determining if a vessel is abandoned, penalties for abandonment, the creation and publication of a national inventory for such vessels, and exemptions for vessels in approved or authorized locations, while calling for rulemaking and conforming amendments to support these regulations.

Money References

  • Commandant may assess a civil penalty of not more than $500 against an owner or operator of a covered vessel determined to be abandoned under subsection (b) for a violation of subsection (a).

4710. Definitions Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section defines key terms used in the subchapter, including "abandon," which refers to leaving a vessel unattended for over 45 days, "covered vessel," which excludes certain barges, and "Indian Tribe," which is defined by another specific U.S. law.

4711. Abandonment of vessels prohibited Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section prohibits the abandonment of vessels on U.S. navigable waters and outlines the process for determining if a vessel is abandoned, including notifying the owner, who may face a penalty of up to $500 and the owner's liability for removal costs. It also details situations where a vessel cannot be considered abandoned, such as when it's in an approved mooring area or on private property with permission.

Money References

  • — (1) IN GENERAL.—The Commandant may assess a civil penalty of not more than $500 against an owner or operator of a covered vessel determined to be abandoned under subsection (b) for a violation of subsection (a). (2) LIABILITY IN REM.—The owner or operator of a covered vessel shall also be liable in rem for a penalty imposed under paragraph (1). (d) Vessels not abandoned.—The Commandant may not determine that a covered vessel is abandoned under this section if— (1) such vessel is located at a federally approved or State approved mooring area; (2) such vessel is located on private property with the permission of the owner of such property; or (3) the owner or operator of such vessel provides a notification to the Commandant that— (A) indicates the location of the vessel; (B) indicates that the vessel is not abandoned; and (C) contains documentation proving that the vessel is allowed to be in such location. ---

4712. Inventory of abandoned vessels Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section requires the Commandant, with input from relevant agencies, to create a public national inventory of abandoned vessels. It outlines that this inventory will have detailed information about each vessel’s location and establishes a process for States, Indian Tribes, or individuals to report potentially abandoned vessels for inclusion.

401. Vessel response plans Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The bill section requires regular checks on equipment and vessels used in responding to oil or hazardous substance spills in U.S. waters, ensuring they have the best removal technology. It also mandates a report to Congress about firefighting capabilities for vessel fires close to shore, including potential improvements in coordination and training for these emergencies.

402. Use of marine casualty investigations Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

Section 402 of the bill modifies Section 6308 of title 46, United States Code, by changing the term "initiated" to "conducted" and clarifying that an administrative proceeding by the United States includes certain proceedings related to oil pollution claims.

403. Timing of review Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

In Section 403 of the bill, a new rule is added to the Oil Pollution Act of 1990, stating that no one can challenge decisions related to a removal action made by an on-scene coordinator before the action is completed.

404. Online incident reporting system Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section requires the National Response Center to create an online system within two years for reporting oil discharges or hazardous substance releases. However, it does not mandate that notifications must be made through this online application.

501. Implementation status of directed actions Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The bill requires the Commandant to submit an annual report from 2025 to 2028 to certain congressional committees about the progress of specific actions outlined in a memorandum focused on accountability and transparency. The report must include the status and future plans for these actions, effectiveness metrics, and any additional measures to address sexual assault and harassment in the Coast Guard.

5116. Implementation status of directed actions Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The Commandant is required to report to certain U.S. Congressional committees by March 1, 2025, and annually for three years after, about the progress of specific actions aimed at increasing accountability and transparency, as described in a key memorandum. The report must outline the status, plans for completion, effectiveness metrics, and additional efforts related to addressing sexual assault and harassment within the Coast Guard.

502. Independent review of Coast Guard reforms Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section requires the Government Accountability Office to report on the Coast Guard's efforts to address sexual assault and harassment within one year, evaluating specific actions and making recommendations for improvement. Additionally, the Commandant must respond within 90 days to these recommendations, either with a plan for implementation or an explanation for any disagreements.

503. Requirement to maintain certain records Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The bill adds a section to United States law that requires the Coast Guard to keep records of decisions on investigations involving their members for at least seven years. This includes memos, emails, notes, and various reports related to the decision, ensuring comprehensive documentation of the investigation process.

955. Requirement to maintain certain records Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section requires the Commandant to keep all work related to final decisions on investigations of Coast Guard members accused of misconduct for at least seven years. It also defines "work product" to include various documents like prosecution memos, emails, and reports, and mandates that a signed memo summarize key materials and decisions in these cases.

504. Study on Coast Guard Academy oversight Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The bill requires the Commandant of the Coast Guard to conduct a study on how the Coast Guard Academy is governed, particularly looking at the roles and responsibilities of its Board of Visitors and Board of Trustees. A report with the study's findings and suggestions for improving the Academy's governance must be submitted to Congress within one year.

505. Providing for the transfer of a cadet who is the victim of a sexual assault or related offense Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section amends U.S. law to allow a cadet at the Coast Guard Academy, who faces an alleged sexual assault, to seek a transfer to another Service Academy or a Senior Reserve Officers' Training Corps program at a different school. The process for such transfers must be expedited, with decisions typically made within 72 hours, and include confidentiality measures. If denied, the cadet can request a review, and upon graduation, they're entitled to commission into the Coast Guard.

506. Designation of officers with particular expertise in military justice or healthcare Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section introduces a new law under United States Code, allowing the Secretary of the Coast Guard to designate a small number of officers as experts in military justice or healthcare. These designated officers will have specific rules for promotion and cannot be promoted above the rank of captain. It also makes various technical amendments to ensure consistency with this new designation.

2132. Designation of officers with particular expertise in military justice or healthcare Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section allows the Secretary to select a small group of Coast Guard officers who have special expertise in military justice or healthcare. These officers will not appear on the general promotion list, will be promoted according to specific guidelines, and cannot be promoted beyond the rank of captain.

507. Direct hire authority for certain personnel of Coast Guard Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section grants the Coast Guard the ability to directly hire qualified individuals for specific non-clinical and criminal investigative roles focused on preventing harmful behaviors, such as suicide and harassment, without following the usual hiring procedures, but this authority will expire on September 30, 2034.

2517. Direct hire authority for certain personnel of Coast Guard Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The Commandant of the Coast Guard is given the authority to directly hire qualified candidates for non-clinical specialist roles that help prevent harmful behaviors and for law enforcement positions in the Coast Guard Criminal Investigative Service. This hiring authority is exempt from certain federal hiring rules and will expire on September 30, 2034.

508. Safe-to-report policy for Coast Guard Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The new section added to chapter 19 of title 14 in the United States Code establishes a "safe-to-report" policy for all members of the Coast Guard, including those in reserve, auxiliary, and at the Coast Guard Academy. This policy is designed to manage minor offenses committed by individuals who report or are victims of sexual assault, aiming to encourage reporting by addressing any minor infractions related to the incident while ensuring they are tracked and evaluated for mitigating or aggravating circumstances.

1907. Safe-to-report policy for Coast Guard Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section mandates the Secretary overseeing the Coast Guard to create a safe-to-report policy to address minor misconduct by Coast Guard members who report or are victims of sexual assault. It requires the establishment of guidelines for handling such incidents and a tracking system for them, ensuring their actions are assessed with consideration for mitigating and aggravating circumstances.

509. Modification of delivery date of Coast Guard sexual assault report Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

Section 509 changes the due date for a Coast Guard sexual assault report in the United States Code from January 15 to March 1.

510. Higher-level review of board of determination decisions Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section amends the United States Code to require that if a board decides to keep an officer who has a record indicating a sexual assault offense, the case must be sent for a higher-level review. The higher-level reviewer has the power to refer the case to a Board of Inquiry for further examination.

511. Review of discharge or dismissal Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section outlines the procedures for reviewing the discharges or dismissals from the Coast Guard, allowing a board to downgrade an honorable discharge if there's clear evidence of sexual misconduct. It also ensures that affected former members have rights to present evidence, appear in person, and be notified of proceedings.

2517. Review of discharge or dismissal Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section describes how a board can change a former Coast Guard member's discharge status from "honorable" to "general (under honorable conditions)" if there is strong evidence they committed sexual assault or harassment while in service. It also explains that former members have rights during the review process, such as presenting evidence, having representation, and receiving written notice of the proceedings.

601. Amendments Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section outlines various amendments to the United States Code and the Oil Pollution Act of 1990, including minor text changes for clarity and the reorganization of certain sections and subsections. These changes primarily involve updates to legal references and adjustments in terminology to improve accuracy and consistency within the legislation.