Overview
Title
To amend title 51, United States Code, to exempt from disclosure by NASA certain technical data, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
NASA wants to keep some special space and airplane information secret, like plans and blueprints, so only certain people like those in the government can see it, but regular people can't unless there are special rules that say they should.
Summary AI
H.R. 7632 aims to amend title 51 of the United States Code to allow NASA to keep certain technical data related to aeronautics and space from being publicly disclosed. The bill specifies that this data includes blueprints, plans, and other technical information that is restricted from export without proper authorization under U.S. export control laws. However, it ensures that such data cannot be withheld from Congress, necessary federal departments, and certain commissions, or if it is eligible for public disclosure through specific regulatory exemptions.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
The bill introduced as H.R. 7632 in the United States Congress seeks to modify Title 51 of the United States Code. Its primary purpose is to empower the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) to withhold certain technical data from public disclosure when it relates to aeronautical or space applications and cannot legally be exported without proper authorization under U.S. export control laws. The bill aims to secure technical information that might otherwise be sensitive or potentially harmful if made widely available, thereby providing a layer of national security protection.
Summary of Significant Issues
Several potential issues surrounding this bill have been identified. First, the provision allowing NASA to withhold technical data is seen as a potential limitation on transparency. This aspect of the bill is concerning because it relies on complex and ever-changing export control laws, which could result in restrictions that many view as excessive or unnecessary.
Furthermore, the definition of "technical data" within the bill is very broad, possibly leading to widespread exclusion of information from public access, not all of which may truly require such protection. This might undermine transparency and accountability normally facilitated by public information sharing.
The bill also lacks a clear procedure to resolve disputes over whether certain data should be withheld. This omission raises concerns about arbitrary decision-making on the part of NASA. There is also a reliance on external statutes such as the Export Control Reform Act of 2018, which could change and affect the applicability and integrity of the bill.
Additionally, the phrasing "if authorized pursuant to law" included in the exceptions to withholding data is vague. This lack of specificity might lead to inconsistent interpretation and application of the bill. Lastly, the bill does not clearly outline accountability measures or oversight mechanisms to prevent possible abuse of the authority granted to NASA under this section.
Public Impact
The broad authority granted to NASA to withhold technical data could potentially reduce the public's access to important information about aeronautics and space activities. For the general public, this might result in reduced transparency and a possible hindrance to understanding NASA's workings and contributions. On the other hand, this could serve to protect national security by preventing sensitive technical data from falling into the wrong hands.
For individuals or entities with specific interests in aerospace and science, such as researchers and academic institutions, the limitations imposed by the bill might restrict access to data that could be crucial for scientific and technological advancement. Conversely, the bill's existence might reassure those concerned about global security, who see this withholding of technical data as a necessary precaution to thwart unauthorized technology transfers.
Stakeholder Impact
From the standpoint of NASA, the bill represents a step towards enhancing its control over sensitive information. It equips NASA with a legal basis to protect technical data that could give rise to security risks if disclosed without necessary approvals. This expanded authority might enable NASA to better safeguard the nation's technological assets.
However, stakeholders such as advocacy groups for transparency might argue that the bill is an overreach, potentially leading to censorship or unnecessary withholding of information that does not warrant such strict protection. Researchers and policy analysts might also express concerns about the bill's possible influence on the flow of information necessary for innovation and oversight.
Overall, while the bill has clear intentions of protecting national security interests, ensuring it does not overly restrict the free exchange of information and accountability processes remains a critical challenge to be addressed.
Issues
The provision allowing NASA to withhold technical data might limit transparency unnecessarily, as per Section 1(c)(1), especially given the reliance on export control laws that are complex and subject to change. This could impact public access to potentially important information.
The broad definition of 'technical data' in Section 1(c)(2) is concerning. It potentially encompasses a wide range of materials, which might lead to excessive withholding of information not sensitive enough to merit such protection, affecting transparency and accountability.
There is a lack of a clear procedure for resolving disputes over whether data qualifies as 'technical data' and is subject to withholding, as noted in Section 1. This absence of a dispute resolution mechanism could lead to arbitrary or inconsistent withholding decisions by NASA.
The reliance on external statutes like the Export Control Reform Act of 2018 and the Arms Export Control Act, as seen in Section 1(c)(1), (c)(4), and (c)(4)(E), may affect the law's integrity and applicability, given that these statutes can change over time.
Subsection 1(c)(4) provides multiple exceptions to the withholding rule. However, the language 'if authorized pursuant to law' is vague and could result in differing interpretations about when it applies, possibly leading to inconsistent application of the law.
There is a notable lack of accountability measures or oversight mechanisms to ensure that NASA does not abuse the withholding authority granted by this section, as mentioned in the general concerns for Section 1.
The necessity and proportionality of allowing such broad powers to NASA without defined oversight mechanisms or checks and balances are not addressed, as highlighted in Section 1. This raises concerns about potential overreach and lack of accountability.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Exemption from disclosure by NASA of certain technical data Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section authorizes the NASA Administrator to keep certain technical data related to aeronautics and space confidential if it cannot legally be exported from the United States without permission under specific export control laws. This confidentiality does not apply to specific entities such as independent commissions, the Aerospace Safety Advisory Panel, federal agencies, Congress, or if public disclosure is allowed under certain regulations.