Overview
Title
To require a plan to improve the cybersecurity and telecommunications of the U.S. Academic Research Fleet, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
H.R. 7630 is a plan to make the boats that help scientists study the ocean safer from hackers and better at sending information. The people in charge have to work with others to figure out the best way to do this and check how they're doing in a couple of years.
Summary AI
H.R. 7630, also known as the "Accelerating Networking, Cyberinfrastructure, and Hardware for Oceanic Research Act" or the "ANCHOR Act," seeks to improve the cybersecurity and telecommunications systems of the U.S. Academic Research Fleet. The bill requires the Director of the National Science Foundation to create a plan assessing the telecommunication and cybersecurity needs of the fleet, in consultation with various federal agencies and universities. The plan should also outline costs, potential upgrades, and funding strategies necessary to enhance these systems. In addition, the bill calls for the submission of a report detailing the progress of implementing these enhancements within two years.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
Summary of the Bill
The proposed legislation, introduced in the 118th Congress and referred to as the "Accelerating Networking, Cyberinfrastructure, and Hardware for Oceanic Research Act" or the "ANCHOR Act," sets forth a plan to enhance the cybersecurity and telecommunications infrastructure of the U.S. Academic Research Fleet. This fleet consists of U.S.-flagged research vessels operated by universities, which receive funding from the National Science Foundation (NSF). The bill mandates the Director of the NSF to create a comprehensive plan in collaboration with other federal and non-federal stakeholders to bolster these systems. The plan should address the fleet's network and cybersecurity needs, necessary costs and resources, optimal implementation timelines, and the potential for shared solutions or centralized management systems.
Significant Issues
One notable issue within the bill is its potential to favor certain organizations over others. The criteria for the U.S. Academic Research Fleet require membership in a specific university-led system and NSF funding, potentially limiting equitable access and favoring organizations already in the circle. The bill's requirement for coordination between multiple parties without defined mechanisms for resolving disputes could present logistical challenges, leading to potential delays.
The inclusion of cybersecurity recommendations from a private advisory group known as JASON raises concerns regarding transparency and neutrality. The absence of a method for updating cybersecurity measures in response to evolving technological and security landscapes calls into question the long-term efficacy of the proposed plan. Additionally, the lack of specific financial provisions for the necessary upgrades could lead to budgetary ambiguities and financial mismanagement.
Potential Impact on the Public
If successfully implemented, this legislation could significantly enhance the cybersecurity and communication systems of vessels that are integral to oceanographic research and consequently improve the safety and efficiency of such research activities. Better networking capabilities could facilitate more effective data collection and sharing, critical for advancements in ocean science which may, in turn, have broader environmental and societal benefits.
However, the lack of transparent and inclusive access criteria for the fleet's membership may limit broader participation among research institutions. Also, any delays or inefficiencies stemming from coordination issues could stymie progress and incur taxpayer costs without corresponding benefits.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Research institutions and universities currently part of the U.S. Academic Research Fleet stand to benefit from the upgraded cybersecurity and telecommunications infrastructure, potentially enhancing their research capabilities and prominence. However, institutions not meeting the inclusion criteria for the fleet might be at a disadvantage, lacking access to the same level of infrastructure improvements.
Federal and non-federal stakeholders involved in planning and implementing these upgrades face coordination challenges but could also benefit from establishing robust, collaborative frameworks for addressing cybersecurity and communication issues.
Overall, while this bill aims to improve crucial research infrastructure, attention to issues such as inclusivity, transparency, coordination, and sustainability in infrastructure development is crucial to maximize its positive impact.
Issues
The criteria outlined for the U.S. Academic Research Fleet in Section 2 could be seen as exclusionary or favor certain organizations, specifically regarding membership in the University-National Oceanographic Laboratory System and receiving funding from the National Science Foundation. This could potentially limit equitable access and participation, raising concerns of fairness and inclusivity.
Section 3 mandates the Director to consult with various federal and non-federal stakeholders in creating a cybersecurity and telecommunications improvement plan, but lacks a specified mechanism for resolving disputes, which may lead to coordination challenges, potential delays, or conflicts.
Section 3 discusses the requirement to consider recommendations from the private advisory group JASON, opening the potential for perceptions of favoritism. Without transparent vetting aligned with public interest, this could be controversial, politically and ethically.
The plan described in Section 3 does not detail how cybersecurity interventions will be updated to keep pace with technological advancements and evolving security threats. This lack of clarity could undermine the effectiveness and future relevance of the plan, imposing a financial burden without guaranteeing sustainable improvements.
Section 4 does not specify the funding or budget allocation for cyberinfrastructure and cybersecurity upgrades, leading to potential financial mismanagement or misallocation of resources.
Several terms in Section 2 are referenced from external legal documents and processes, leading to potential confusion and misunderstandings unless additional clarity or accessibility is provided for those seeking information.
The language in Section 4 regarding the report's timing is slightly ambiguous, which could lead to misunderstandings about deadlines, impacting accountability and transparency of the progress assessment process.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the bill states that it can be referred to as the "Accelerating Networking, Cyberinfrastructure, and Hardware for Oceanic Research Act" or the "ANCHOR Act."
2. Definitions Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section provides definitions for terms used in the act, including "Director," referring to the Director of the National Science Foundation, "oceanographic research vessel," and "U.S. Academic Research Fleet," which consists of U.S.-flagged research vessels part of a university-led system that receives funding from the National Science Foundation.
3. Plan to improve cybersecurity and telecommunications of U.S. Academic Research Fleet Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section requires the Director to develop a plan, in consultation with other relevant federal agency leaders and universities or labs that operate vessels, to enhance the cybersecurity and telecommunications capabilities of the U.S. Academic Research Fleet within one year. The plan must include assessments and proposals regarding the fleet's telecom and cybersecurity needs, costs, implementation time, and potential common solutions, while also considering network capabilities and cybersecurity standards to support scientific missions and improve communication and safety.
4. Implementation of and report on plan Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Director, working with the Office of Naval Research and others, may enhance the technology and cybersecurity of the U.S. Academic Research Fleet as per an earlier plan. Within two years of that plan's creation, a report on these improvements must be submitted to the relevant committees in Congress.