Overview
Title
An Act To require a plan to improve the cybersecurity and telecommunications of the U.S. Academic Research Fleet, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
H.R. 7630 wants to make sure the U.S. Academic Research Fleet, which is like a special group of research ships, has better internet safety and connection. The plan is to make their computers and networks safer and faster, and they want everyone to work together and make it happen without costing too much time or money.
Summary AI
H.R. 7630, known as the “ANCHOR Act,” mandates the creation of a detailed plan to enhance the cybersecurity and telecommunications capabilities of the U.S. Academic Research Fleet. The National Science Foundation Director, along with other relevant federal and non-federal entities, will coordinate efforts to assess and address the fleet's technological needs. The plan will focus on improving network capabilities, ensuring data security, and providing appropriate training, with considerations for cost and time efficiency. Additionally, the Director is tasked to support these improvements and report on progress within two years.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
The "Accelerating Networking, Cyberinfrastructure, and Hardware for Oceanic Research Act" or "ANCHOR Act," is a legislative proposal aimed at bolstering the cybersecurity and telecommunications capabilities of the U.S. Academic Research Fleet. This fleet comprises U.S.-flagged vessels used for oceanographic research by universities and laboratories, receiving funding from the National Science Foundation. The bill tasks the Director of the National Science Foundation with crafting a comprehensive plan to assess and improve these capabilities. This plan includes evaluating telecom and cybersecurity needs, estimating related costs, and proposing potential solutions and coordination strategies with relevant stakeholders. The bill also mandates periodic reporting on the progress of these improvements.
Summary of Significant Issues
Several significant issues arise in this legislation. Key among these is the potential for exclusionary criteria that might favor certain organizations, especially those already participating in specific academic networks like the University-National Oceanographic Laboratory System. Additionally, the bill's requirement for the Director to consult with a wide array of stakeholders may pose coordination challenges, potentially delaying the submission and execution of the plan. There is also concern that the bill lacks specific funding allocations, which could result in uncertain financial commitments and potentially lead to overspending. Moreover, some definitions and phrases within the bill are not clear, leading to ambiguities that may impact the act's implementation and compliance.
Impact on the Public
For the general public, the ANCHOR Act could enhance scientific research capabilities, potentially leading to advancements in oceanographic knowledge. Improved cybersecurity and telecommunications on research vessels could translate to more robust and secure scientific outputs, benefiting educational and environmental insights accessible to the general public.
However, the financial impact on taxpayers might be significant if the act results in overspending due to unspecified financial commitments and lack of defined budget constraints. Ensuring transparency and judicious use of resources will be essential to gain public trust and support for the initiatives outlined in the bill.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
For research institutions and universities operating oceanographic research vessels, the bill could offer significant upgrades in their technical and operational capacities, enabling more efficient and safe research operations. However, institutions not currently part of the defined academic system might feel marginalized if they are not able to participate equally or benefit from the planned enhancements, exacerbating existing inequalities in research opportunities.
For federal and non-federal vessel owners, the consultation process outlined in the bill could provide an opportunity to influence the prioritization and implementation of improvements. However, the complexity of coordinating multiple stakeholders might cause delays, which may impact operational readiness and research expeditions.
Overall, while the ANCHOR Act aims to address critical infrastructure needs within the U.S. Academic Research Fleet, adequate oversight, clear guidelines, and collaborative decision-making will be crucial in minimizing potential downsides and ensuring equitable benefits across the spectrum of stakeholders.
Issues
The criteria for the U.S. Academic Research Fleet in Section 2 include conditions that might unfairly favor certain organizations, especially those that are part of the University-National Oceanographic Laboratory System and receive funding from the National Science Foundation. This could be seen as exclusionary or creating a bias towards existing entities.
In Section 3, the requirement for the Director to consult with a wide range of stakeholders might create coordination challenges and potential delays in the submission and implementation of the cybersecurity and telecommunications improvement plan, potentially affecting the fleet's cyber readiness.
The lack of specific funding or budget allocation for the upgrades in Section 4 could lead to overspending or unclear financial commitments, posing a significant financial risk to stakeholders involved in the implementation of the plan.
The definition of 'Director' in Section 2 could be ambiguous, as it does not specify whether it refers to the current Director of the National Science Foundation or any future Director, leading to potential confusion in the act's application and execution.
The consultation in Section 3 with non-federal vessel owners and the inclusion of recommendations from the private advisory group JASON could raise concerns of favoritism unless these are transparently vetted and aligned with public interests.
The criteria in Section 4 for selecting which upgrades to support are not clearly defined, which could result in favoritism, lack of transparency, or inequitable resource distribution among the fleet's stakeholders.
Section 3's language on network capabilities mentions potentially outdated targets given the rapid evolution of technology, risking specifications that may quickly become obsolete, impacting the fleet's technological efficiency.
The phrase 'actively participants administered within' in Section 2 is unclear and could benefit from rephrasing for clarity to ensure equitable access and understanding of eligibility criteria for membership in the fleet.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the bill states that it can be referred to as the "Accelerating Networking, Cyberinfrastructure, and Hardware for Oceanic Research Act" or the "ANCHOR Act."
2. Definitions Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section provides definitions for terms used in the act, including "Director," referring to the Director of the National Science Foundation, "oceanographic research vessel," and "U.S. Academic Research Fleet," which consists of U.S.-flagged research vessels part of a university-led system that receives funding from the National Science Foundation.
3. Plan to improve cybersecurity and telecommunications of U.S. Academic Research Fleet Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section requires the Director to develop a plan, in consultation with other relevant federal agency leaders and universities or labs that operate vessels, to enhance the cybersecurity and telecommunications capabilities of the U.S. Academic Research Fleet within one year. The plan must include assessments and proposals regarding the fleet's telecom and cybersecurity needs, costs, implementation time, and potential common solutions, while also considering network capabilities and cybersecurity standards to support scientific missions and improve communication and safety.
4. Implementation of and report on plan Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Director, working with the Office of Naval Research and others, may enhance the technology and cybersecurity of the U.S. Academic Research Fleet as per an earlier plan. Within two years of that plan's creation, a report on these improvements must be submitted to the relevant committees in Congress.