Overview

Title

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at Block 1025, Lots 18 & 19, Northeast Corner of US Route 9 South and Main Street in the Township of Middle, County of Cape May, New Jersey, as the George Henry White Post Office Building.

ELI5 AI

This bill wants to give a special name to a post office in New Jersey, calling it the "George Henry White Post Office Building." It's like giving the post office a new name badge, but it doesn't say why it's named like that or if it will cost money to do so.

Summary AI

H.R. 7607 is a congressional bill introduced by Representative Van Drew and co-sponsored by several other representatives from New Jersey. The bill proposes to name the United States Postal Service facility located at Block 1025, Lots 18 & 19, on the Northeast corner of US Route 9 South and Main Street in Middle Township, Cape May County, New Jersey, as the "George Henry White Post Office Building." If passed, all references to this facility in official documents and maps would adopt this new designation.

Published

2024-03-08
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Introduced in House
Date: 2024-03-08
Package ID: BILLS-118hr7607ih

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
1
Words:
362
Pages:
2
Sentences:
8

Language

Nouns: 161
Verbs: 13
Adjectives: 3
Adverbs: 0
Numbers: 16
Entities: 60

Complexity

Average Token Length:
3.85
Average Sentence Length:
45.25
Token Entropy:
4.36
Readability (ARI):
22.81

AnalysisAI

General Summary of the Bill

The bill titled "H. R. 7607" aims to rename a United States Postal Service facility. This facility, located at Block 1025, Lots 18 & 19, at the Northeast corner of US Route 9 South and Main Street in the Township of Middle, Cape May County, New Jersey, would be designated as the "George Henry White Post Office Building." The legislation mandates that any references to this location in official documents, maps, or records should reflect this new designation.

Summary of Significant Issues

One notable issue with the bill is the absence of context regarding why the post office is being renamed after George Henry White. Without any explanation or background provided, it might appear that the designation is arbitrary or politically motivated. Furthermore, the bill lacks details about any potential costs associated with the renaming, such as new signage or administrative changes, raising concerns about possible unnecessary public spending.

Additionally, the impacts of this renaming on the community or postal operations are not addressed in the bill. Without a clear indication of the benefits or significance of this renaming, stakeholders and the public might question its relevance.

Impact on the Public and Stakeholders

On a broad level, the renaming of a postal facility may seem inconsequential, but it does carry symbolic weight. By choosing to honor an individual such as George Henry White, the bill could bring recognition to historical figures and their contributions. If George Henry White holds significance to the local community or broader American history, this renaming could serve as an educational opportunity and foster a sense of pride within the community.

However, the lack of explanation in the bill may leave the public and stakeholders questioning the justification for such a change. For residents of the area and postal employees, there might be curiosity or confusion regarding who George Henry White was and why his name is being associated with their local post office.

On a positive note, the renaming could raise awareness and honor the legacy of individuals who have made significant contributions. Conversely, if the name lacks a direct connection to the community or historical significance, stakeholders might view it as a trivial pursuit or a misuse of government resources.

Overall, the bill's impact will likely depend on the community's knowledge and personal association with George Henry White, as well as how well the rationale behind the renaming is communicated to the public.

Issues

  • The bill lacks context on why the post office facility is being designated with the name 'George Henry White', raising potential concerns about the necessity and significance of this designation. This could be perceived as politically motivated without adequate explanation as to the civic importance of George Henry White, which is not provided in Section 1.

  • There is no information regarding potential costs associated with the renaming of the facility, such as expenses for new signage or other changes, which could represent unnecessary public spending if not properly justified and monitored, as suggested in Section 1.

  • The impact of renaming the post office building on the community or postal service operations is not addressed in the bill. The lack of information about the benefits or consequences of such a designation could lead to questions about its importance or relevance as noted in Section 1.

  • The bill does not specify if there are any specific initiatives or programs associated with the dedication of the facility to George Henry White, which could have underscored the significance of the designation and justified its implementation, as commented in Section 1.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. George Henry White Post Office Building Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section names a United States Postal Service facility located at Block 1025, Lots 18 & 19, at the Northeast corner of US Route 9 South and Main Street in the Township of Middle, Cape May County, New Jersey, as the “George Henry White Post Office Building.” Additionally, any reference to this facility in official records will now be recognized by this new name.