Overview

Title

To amend the Defense Production Act of 1950 to prohibit the President from making provision for the purchase of solar panels under the authority of such Act, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

H.R. 7602 is trying to change a rule so that the President cannot use special powers to buy certain types of solar panels called crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells. This change might make it harder to use solar panels to make clean energy.

Summary AI

H.R. 7602, also known as the “Planes Not Panels Act,” aims to amend the Defense Production Act of 1950. The bill seeks to prohibit the President from using the authority of the Defense Production Act to purchase solar panels. Specifically, it prevents commitments or purchases of crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells or modules by the President under this Act.

Published

2024-03-08
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Introduced in House
Date: 2024-03-08
Package ID: BILLS-118hr7602ih

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
2
Words:
255
Pages:
2
Sentences:
10

Language

Nouns: 77
Verbs: 19
Adjectives: 12
Adverbs: 0
Numbers: 12
Entities: 18

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.11
Average Sentence Length:
25.50
Token Entropy:
4.49
Readability (ARI):
14.00

AnalysisAI

The bill titled "Planes Not Panels Act" seeks to amend the Defense Production Act of 1950 by adding a provision that limits the President's ability to use the Act to purchase solar panels. Specifically, it prevents any authority granted by this law from being employed to procure crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells or modules.

General Summary of the Bill

The proposed legislation primarily aims to restrict the President's powers under the Defense Production Act when it comes to the acquisition of solar panels. By adding this specific prohibition, the bill could potentially change the way renewable energy resources, specifically solar panels, are integrated into national defense or other federally related procurement efforts.

Summary of Significant Issues

One significant issue with the bill is its limiting impact on renewable energy initiatives. In a time where transitioning to renewable energy sources is a high priority for many environmental agendas, this restriction could be seen as a step backward. Critics may express concern that restricting the President's ability to purchase solar panels limits the flexibility needed to address climate change effectively.

There is also an issue with the bill's definition of "solar panel," which is restricted to crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells or modules. This narrow definition might inadvertently exclude other solar technologies, leading to possible legal challenges or confusion about what exactly falls under this prohibition.

Impact on the Public and Stakeholders

The broader public might perceive this bill as a setback for renewable energy goals if it hinders the implementation of solar technology across federal projects. As solar energy becomes more crucial in the fight against climate change, limiting its access through federal procurement could delay advancements in energy sustainability.

For stakeholders within the renewable energy sector, this bill may present potential challenges. Manufacturers of crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells might face a reduced federal market for their products, which could impact business and innovation. On the other hand, the bill could create opportunities for producers of alternative solar technologies not covered by the definition to focus on fulfilling federal needs.

Conversely, proponents of cutting federal spending could see this restriction as a positive step towards limiting government size and influence in the energy marketplace. This group might argue that it allows the private sector to take a more prominent role in advancing solar technology.

In summary, while the "Planes Not Panels Act" aims to limit presidential authority under a specific Act, it also raises significant discussions about energy policy, government procurement, and the pace of transitioning to renewable energy sources. The bill highlights the ongoing debate between reducing government spending and promoting federal involvement in climate initiatives.

Issues

  • The bill prohibits the President from using the Defense Production Act to make provisions for the purchase of solar panels. This could have significant political implications, especially in the context of ongoing discussions about renewable energy and climate change policy. Critics may argue that this limitation could hinder efforts to transition to clean energy sources. (Sec. 2)

  • The definition of 'solar panel' in Sec. 2 is specific to crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells or modules. This might be too narrow and could exclude other types of solar technology, potentially leading to legal challenges or debates about what qualifies as a 'solar panel.'

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The first section of the bill states that the official title of this act is the "Planes Not Panels Act."

2. Limitation on presidential action Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section amends the Defense Production Act of 1950 to state that the President cannot use the law's powers to purchase or commit to purchasing solar panels, which are defined as crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells or modules.