Overview
Title
To direct the Librarian of Congress to promote the more cost-effective, efficient, and expanded availability of the Annotated Constitution and pocket-part supplements by replacing the hardbound versions with digital versions.
ELI5 AI
The bill wants to save money and make sure everyone can get important U.S. Constitution books by putting them online instead of printing them as big books. This way, people can see them for free using a computer from anywhere.
Summary AI
H.R. 7592 proposes changes to how the Annotated Constitution and its updates are published. It seeks to stop producing them in hardbound versions and instead provide them in digital format. This would make the documents more cost-effective and accessible because they will be available online for Congress and the public. The bill also ensures that these digital versions will remain accessible on a public Library of Congress website.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
H.R. 7592 is a legislative proposal aimed at the digitization of the Annotated Constitution and its supplementary materials, a transition from traditional hardbound copies to digital versions. Introduced in the House of Representatives, the bill directs the Librarian of Congress to ensure these documents are available digitally, accessible to the public via the Library of Congress's website, starting after the October 2023 Supreme Court term. The intention is to make these legal resources more cost-effective, efficient, and widely available, leveraging modern digital technologies over printed formats.
Summary of Significant Issues
A number of challenges accompany this transition. While the shift promises long-term savings and efficiency, initial costs related to digital infrastructure and archiving may offset those benefits. Furthermore, the bill lacks details on privacy and security measures for the digital documents, which could lead to data protection concerns. The reliance on digital formats raises issues of accessibility for individuals without internet access or sufficient digital literacy, potentially restricting access to these critical legal documents. The assumptions regarding the reliability and integrity of digital formats as suitable replacements for hardbound copies are not fully addressed. Lastly, the requirement to maintain these documents perpetually in a digital form poses sustainability challenges over the long term.
Public Impact
For the general public, the transition to digital versions of the Annotated Constitution could mean easier access to up-to-date legal information, provided they have internet access. This move could democratize access to vital legal resources, potentially making it easier for individuals, educators, and small legal practices to obtain these documents without having to bear the costs associated with acquiring printed volumes. However, those without reliable internet or the necessary digital skills may find themselves at a disadvantage, compounding issues related to digital inequality.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Legal Professionals and Researchers: For lawyers, scholars, and legal researchers, digital access to the Annotated Constitution could streamline research processes by offering easily searchable formats and the latest legal annotations. This could enhance their efficiency and reduce overhead costs related to buying and maintaining physical copies.
Libraries and Educational Institutions: Institutions may benefit financially from the transition, as they may no longer need to allocate space or funding for extensive printed legal materials. However, they might also need to invest in digital literacy programs to assist those struggling with the new format.
Public and Policy Makers: The public and policymakers could benefit from more transparent and readily available legal information, enabling more informed discussions and decisions. However, the concerns about privacy, data security, and long-term digital preservation could become points of contention, especially if inadequately addressed in the bill's implementation phases.
While the bill aims to modernize and improve accessibility to important legal documents, careful consideration must be given to ensure an equitable transition that addresses security, cost, and accessibility concerns comprehensively.
Issues
The transition from hardbound to digital formats could incur initial costs related to digital infrastructure and archiving, which may affect the bill's goal of being cost-effective, as specified in Section 1.
The bill lacks specifics on privacy and security measures for the digital versions available on a public website, potentially leading to data protection issues. This concern is highlighted in Section 1(b).
There might be accessibility issues for individuals without internet access or digital literacy, which raises ethical concerns about equal access to important legal documents, as the bill mandates digital availability in Section 1.
The reliability and integrity of digital documents in replacing hardbound copies are assumed by the bill without detailing measures to ensure the same, as mentioned in Section 1.
The requirement for digital versions to be perpetually available could strain resources, raising concerns about the long-term sustainability of digital preservation, as outlined in Section 1(b).
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Repeal requirement for Congressional Research Service to prepare Annotated Constitution and supplements in hardbound version Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill proposes to stop printing the annotated version of the U.S. Constitution in hardbound books and instead, have digital versions available online. It mandates that the Librarian of Congress prepare digital editions of the Constitution Annotated and its supplements, making them accessible to Congress and the public on the Library of Congress's website, starting after the October 2023 Supreme Court term.