Overview

Title

To impose certain conditions on the issuance of diplomatic and student visas to nationals of certain covered nations.

ELI5 AI

The bill wants to make rules for students and diplomats from a few countries, like China and Russia, to make sure they don't do naughty things like spying when they're in the U.S. If they break the rules, they can lose their permission to stay.

Summary AI

The bill, H.R. 7590, named the "Breaking Beijing’s Hold on Campus Act of 2024," aims to set specific requirements for issuing diplomatic and student visas to citizens of certain countries, including China, Russia, Iran, and North Korea. It requires applicants from these nations to certify that they will not engage in activities like spying on or reporting students exercising their rights in the U.S. or engaging in transnational repression. The bill also mandates that members of foreign missions from these countries notify and seek approval from the U.S. Secretary of State before visiting American educational and research institutions. Penalties for violating these requirements include immediate termination of visa status.

Published

2024-03-08
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Introduced in House
Date: 2024-03-08
Package ID: BILLS-118hr7590ih

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
3
Words:
1,469
Pages:
8
Sentences:
33

Language

Nouns: 410
Verbs: 134
Adjectives: 57
Adverbs: 5
Numbers: 31
Entities: 61

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.12
Average Sentence Length:
44.52
Token Entropy:
4.90
Readability (ARI):
23.88

AnalysisAI

General Summary of the Bill

The piece of legislation known as the "Breaking Beijing’s Hold on Campus Act of 2024" introduces specific measures affecting the issuance of diplomatic and student visas for nationals from certain countries identified as "covered nations." These nations include China, Russia, Iran, and North Korea. The bill mandates that individuals from these countries seeking visas must certify they will not engage in activities related to monitoring, reporting on, or suppressing others on behalf of their home governments while in the United States. Furthermore, it sets forth a requirement for foreign diplomats visiting U.S. educational and research institutions to seek prior approval, with a 30-day notification period.

Summary of Significant Issues

A primary concern with this bill is the focus on only four nations—China, Russia, Iran, and North Korea—as "covered nations." This selection could potentially overlook other countries that might pose similar threats, thus limiting the bill's effectiveness. Additionally, the bill defines "transnational repression" in a broad manner, which may lead to challenges in interpreting and enforcing the law consistently.

For the implementation of the proposed visa conditions, the bill provides no specific criteria or procedural guidelines for determining violations. This lack of clarity might result in inconsistent application and potential biases. Moreover, the absence of an outlined appeal process for individuals whose visas are revoked raises issues regarding due process and fair treatment.

In terms of travel notification for foreign diplomats, the bill does not specify exceptions for urgent or unforeseen academic collaborations, which could unnecessarily delay legitimate visits. The requirement of a 30-day notification period prior to approval seems arbitrary and may impact diplomatic and research activities negatively. Furthermore, the text does not clarify whether multiple visits can be covered by a single notification or if separate requests are needed for each, potentially causing confusion.

Impact on the Public and Stakeholders

This bill could have significant implications for the international academic community and the broader public. By imposing strict conditions on student and diplomatic visas, it may deter individuals from "covered nations" from pursuing educational opportunities or diplomatic missions in the United States, particularly if they feel at risk of losing their visa status. This could lead to a reduction in cultural and academic exchanges that are typically mutually beneficial.

For universities and research institutions, these restrictions may result in decreased enrollment of international students and reduced collaboration with foreign academic entities. On a positive note, the bill aims to protect students in the U.S. from potential foreign surveillance or pressure, thereby safeguarding their rights and privacy.

Foreign diplomats and educational bodies from the identified countries might view these provisions as discriminatory or overly burdensome. The additional steps required for approval before visits could strain relations and hinder cooperative projects.

Overall, while the bill seeks to address legitimate concerns about foreign interference and protection of rights within U.S. borders, its execution may require more precise guidelines and a broader consideration of its effects on international relations and education. Balancing security concerns with fostering international goodwill and academic freedom remains a delicate task.

Issues

  • The term 'covered nation' is limited to four countries (China, Russia, Iran, and North Korea) and may not cover other nations that might pose similar concerns, potentially limiting the bill's effectiveness. (Section 2, Section 3)

  • The definition of 'transnational repression' is broad and may be open to interpretation, potentially causing enforcement challenges. This ambiguity could lead to varying applications of the law. (Section 2)

  • The bill does not specify a process or criteria for how the Secretary of State and the Secretary of Homeland Security will determine violations of certification, which may lead to inconsistencies and potential bias in enforcement. (Section 2)

  • There is no clarity on the appeal process for individuals whose nonimmigrant status is terminated due to alleged violations, raising concerns about due process and fair treatment. (Section 2)

  • The term 'covered nation' is referred to but not defined within Section 3, which could lead to ambiguity and confusion regarding which countries are included for travel restrictions and notifications. (Section 3)

  • The notification period of 30 days before a visit can be approved seems arbitrary and may cause unnecessary delays for legitimate visits, which may affect academic, diplomatic, and research collaborations. (Section 3)

  • The bill does not provide a process for handling situations where the 30-day waiting period for approval could be expedited for urgent or unforeseen academic collaborations, potentially hindering timely research opportunities. (Section 3)

  • The text does not specify if multiple visits under a single approval request are allowed or if each visit requires a separate notification and approval, potentially creating confusion about procedural requirements for foreign visitors. (Section 3)

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The first section of this Act states that it is officially called the “Breaking Beijing’s Hold on Campus Act of 2024.”

2. Certain conditions on the issuance of diplomatic and student visas Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section outlines specific conditions for nationals of certain countries (China, Russia, Iran, and North Korea) who are applying for diplomatic or student visas in the United States. These individuals must certify that they will not engage in actions such as monitoring, reporting on, or repressing others on behalf of their home countries, especially activities aimed at suppressing the exercise of rights protected by U.S. laws. If they fail to comply, their visa status can be revoked.

3. Prior notification of certain travel Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The Secretary of State will require foreign diplomats from certain countries to inform and seek approval before visiting U.S. colleges or research centers. Approval can only be given after specific U.S. government committees and the Secretary of Education are notified, and at least 30 days have passed. A visit is defined as being on the premises of these institutions or their facilities.