Overview

Title

To amend the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 to require the Congressional Budget Office to provide cost estimates for legislation reported by the Committee on Appropriations of each House, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

The bill wants the people in charge of money in the government to tell everyone how much things will cost when they make new rules, so that everyone knows if they are spending more or less and from where the money is coming. It tries to make sure they give lots of details but also makes sure they don't skip important steps to check everything is right.

Summary AI

H. R. 7584 proposes changes to the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 to enhance transparency by requiring the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) to provide detailed cost estimates for legislation reported by the Appropriations Committees in both the House and the Senate. The bill specifies that these estimates should include various financial impacts, such as total discretionary budget authority, comparisons with existing budget allocations, estimated total outlays, rescissions, offsetting receipts, and any direct spending. Additionally, it mandates notations for different budget categorizations and effects from any authorizing provisions. This measure aims to ensure legislators have a clear understanding of the financial repercussions of appropriations bills.

Published

2024-03-07
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Introduced in House
Date: 2024-03-07
Package ID: BILLS-118hr7584ih

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
2
Words:
631
Pages:
3
Sentences:
17

Language

Nouns: 190
Verbs: 43
Adjectives: 27
Adverbs: 5
Numbers: 29
Entities: 56

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.20
Average Sentence Length:
37.12
Token Entropy:
4.71
Readability (ARI):
20.24

AnalysisAI

Overview of the Bill

H.R. 7584, titled the "Appropriations Transparency Act of 2024," proposes a modification to the Congressional Budget Act of 1974. Introduced in the House of Representatives on March 7, 2024, the bill mandates the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) to prepare detailed cost estimates for any legislation reported by the Appropriations Committees of both the House and the Senate. This requirement aims to enhance transparency by providing comprehensive financial insights into appropriation measures.

Significant Issues

The bill presents several notable issues. First, while Section 1 offers a short title, it lacks substantive information regarding the bill's content or objectives. This absence of detail potentially allows for ambiguity and may hinder stakeholders' and the public’s capacity to rigorously assess the bill's financial or ethical implications.

Section 2 seeks to enforce a detailed breakdown of financial data for appropriations, including discretionary budget authority, estimated total spending, and other pertinent financial metrics. While this provision promotes fiscal transparency, it may also complicate legislative proceedings due to the intricacy and diversity of economic forecasting. The requirement for exhaustive estimates could strain the Congressional Budget Office, potentially leading to delays or discrepancies in reporting.

Furthermore, Section 2 exempts appropriations committees from certain house procedural safeguards under Rule XIII, Clause 8. This could raise concerns about diminished oversight and scrutiny in the consideration of budgetary legislation, potentially allowing for unchecked spending.

Public Impact

Broadly speaking, the proposed changes could influence the public by increasing the CBO's visibility of costs associated with legislative measures, potentially facilitating more informed public discourse regarding government spending. Enhanced transparency may also lead to a more accountable fiscal environment, where taxpayers can better comprehend how their funds are allocated.

From a positive perspective, this enhanced accountability might lead to more prudent financial decisions by legislators, benefiting the public by reducing wasteful spending and improving fiscal management. However, the potentially increased complexity of legislative procedures could cause delays in passing necessary funding measures, impacting services and programs reliant on timely budget approvals.

Impact on Stakeholders

For legislators and policymakers, the bill introduces both opportunities and challenges. While the CBO's comprehensive cost estimates could serve as valuable tools in decision-making and justifying appropriations, the additional layers of analysis might slow the legislative process and complicate negotiations over budget priorities.

The CBO itself faces the prospect of increased workload and pressure to provide detailed forecasts within potentially tight timeframes. This burden could necessitate additional resources or staffing, impacting the office's overall efficiency unless adequately addressed.

For advocacy groups and watchdog organizations focused on fiscal responsibility, the bill is likely a welcome development, offering new avenues for oversight and accountability. However, they must remain vigilant in ensuring that the additional complexities do not obscure critical fiscal details.

In sum, while H.R. 7584 aims to bring about greater transparency and accountability in congressional appropriations, it also introduces challenges that require careful consideration and balancing of interests among various stakeholders.

Issues

  • The lack of detail in Section 1, which only addresses the short title, makes it difficult to scrutinize the bill for specific financial or ethical implications, potentially leaving room for ambiguity or misinterpretation in application.

  • Section 2 amends the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 to require the Congressional Budget Office to provide detailed cost estimates for appropriations, which could significantly affect legislative processes by enhancing transparency and accountability. However, the effectiveness and accuracy of these estimates might be debated, given the complexity and variability of economic forecasting.

  • The inclusion in Section 2 of various specific categories of financial data (such as discretionary budget authority, rescissions, and CHIMPs) represents a comprehensive approach to fiscal transparency; however, it may also complicate the legislative process and burden the Congressional Budget Office, potentially causing delays or inconsistencies in reporting.

  • Section 2's exemption of appropriations committees from Rule XIII, Clause 8 of the House Rules, could raise concerns about circumventing existing procedural safeguards surrounding budgetary legislation, potentially leading to reduced scrutiny or oversight of appropriations bills.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The first section of the bill provides the short title, stating that the Act may be referred to as the “Appropriations Transparency Act of 2024.”

2. Cost estimates for legislation reported by Committees on Appropriations Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section amends the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 to require detailed cost estimates for bills or joint resolutions reported by the Committee on Appropriations. These estimates must include information about budget authority, comparisons to budget allocations, estimated total spending, changes in budget authority and outlays, and other financial effects, with certain exceptions to House rules for these appropriations measures.