Overview
Title
An Act To amend section 206 of the E-Government Act of 2002 to improve the integrity and management of mass comments and computer-generated comments in the regulatory review process, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
The H.R. 7528 bill wants to make sure when people or computers send lots of comments about new rules, they are checked and organized better. This helps rule-makers understand what real people are saying and not get overwhelmed by fake or repeated messages.
Summary AI
The H.R. 7528 bill, titled the "Comment Integrity and Management Act of 2024," aims to improve how federal agencies handle mass and computer-generated comments in the regulatory review process. It amends the E-Government Act of 2002 to require agencies to verify whether comments are submitted by humans and manage large volumes of similar comments by labeling them and possibly only displaying a representative sample on their websites. The bill directs the Office of Management and Budget to provide guidance on implementing these updates and requires agencies to make and publicly share policies on handling such comments. Additionally, it mandates updates to government websites to ensure compliance and calls for a report on the prevalence and impact of computer-generated comments on the rulemaking process.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
The Comment Integrity and Management Act of 2024 aims to amend section 206 of the E-Government Act of 2002. The core objective of this legislative proposal is to enhance how federal agencies handle mass and computer-generated comments during the regulatory review process. It seeks to maintain the integrity of public participation in rulemaking by ensuring that comments submitted electronically are genuine contributions from individuals rather than automated systems.
General Summary of the Bill
The bill stipulates several measures to achieve its objectives:
Verification of Comments: Federal agencies must attempt to verify whether comments are submitted by human beings rather than using computer automation.
Identification of Mass Comments: Agencies are required to determine whether submissions qualify as mass comments—large volumes of identical or similar comments—and label them accordingly.
Handling and Management: The law will allow limited posting of mass comments, either by showing a representative sample or noting the number of similar submissions.
Guidance and Policies: The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) will provide guidance on best practices for handling comments, while each agency must establish policies for managing these comments, following the OMB’s guidance.
System Updates: Agencies are tasked with updating their websites and information systems to comply with the new requirements.
Reporting: The Government Accountability Office (GAO) will report on the prevalence and impact of computer-generated comments on the rulemaking process.
Summary of Significant Issues
The bill includes several notable issues that could impact its implementation:
Lack of Budget Specification: There is no clear allocation of resources or budget, which could lead to financial difficulties, especially for smaller agencies required to upgrade systems and implement new procedures.
Guideline Clarity: The definitions and guidelines for distinguishing between human-submitted and computer-generated comments are vague, potentially leading to inconsistent applications across different federal agencies.
Implementation Concerns: Although the bill establishes deadlines for initial actions, it lacks clarity around accountability measures and timelines for future tasks, which may cause delays.
Cost Implications: The bill does not address the potential costs involved in managing the systems required to handle mass comments efficiently, which could strain existing resources.
Impact on the Public
Broadly, the bill has the potential to improve the integrity of public participation in the regulatory process by verifying the authenticity of electronically submitted comments. This measure could enhance public trust in the rulemaking procedure by ensuring that genuine voices are not drowned out by automated submissions. However, without clear resources or guidelines, the effectiveness of the bill could be undermined, potentially leading to inefficiencies.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Federal Agencies: Agencies will face new administrative burdens to verify comment authenticity and manage online submissions. Larger agencies may have the infrastructure to handle these changes, but smaller agencies might struggle without additional funding.
Public Participants: For individuals and organizations that rely on mass comments to express collective viewpoints, the bill may both hinder and streamline their contributions. On the one hand, it recognizes mass comments as legitimate; on the other, it limits their publication as individual entries, possibly affecting perceived visibility.
Technology Providers: Companies offering solutions for managing digital comment systems may see increased demand as agencies seek technological assistance to meet the bill's requirements.
In conclusion, the Comment Integrity and Management Act of 2024 is a step towards integrating technology into the regulatory process more securely and effectively. However, careful consideration of implementation challenges and resource allocation will be essential for realizing the bill's intended benefits.
Issues
The bill does not specify the budget or resources allocated for implementing the new procedures and systems in Section 3, potentially leading to unforeseen expenditures and financial strain on smaller agencies.
Section 3 lacks clear guidelines and criteria for distinguishing between human-submitted and computer-generated comments, which could lead to inconsistent implementation across agencies and questions about the integrity of the regulatory review process.
Section 2 fails to address the potential costs involved in managing mass and computer-generated comments, raising concerns about financial implications for federal agencies handling these tasks.
The language used in defining 'mass comment' and 'computer-generated comment' in Section 3 lacks precision, making it difficult to differentiate between similar terms and their practical implications.
Section 3 includes several future-oriented tasks, such as updates and policy establishments, without clear accountability measures or timelines for each action beyond the initial deadlines, which might lead to potential delays or lack of follow-through.
The bill mandates updates to websites and information systems in Section 3(b) without detailing how agencies will fund these updates, which could pose financial challenges, particularly for smaller agencies.
Section 2 does not specify how federal agencies should manage mass and computer-generated comments, leading to potential inconsistency in implementation across different agencies.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the bill provides the official name of the legislation, which is the "Comment Integrity and Management Act of 2024."
2. Purpose Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The purpose of this Act is to assist Federal agencies in handling mass and automated comments during the regulatory process, while ensuring that mass comments are still encouraged as they are essential to the process.
3. Improving integrity and management of mass comments and computer-generated comments in the regulatory review process Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section aims to enhance the integrity and management of electronic comments in the regulatory review process by ensuring they are submitted by humans, identifying mass comments, and managing computer-generated comments. It requires agencies to verify, identify, and label mass comments, and develop policies consistent with guidance issued by the Office of Management and Budget; it also involves updating systems and provides for a report on the prevalence and impact of computer-generated comments.