Overview
Title
An Act To amend section 206 of the E-Government Act of 2002 to improve the integrity and management of mass comments and computer-generated comments in the regulatory review process, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
H.R. 7528 is a bill that wants to make sure that when people say things about new rules, the government knows if the comments are real or from a computer, and they will only show a few examples if lots of people say the same thing.
Summary AI
H.R. 7528, the "Comment Integrity and Management Act of 2024," aims to improve how federal agencies handle mass and computer-generated comments in the regulatory review process. This bill amends the E-Government Act of 2002 by requiring agencies to verify if comments are submitted by real people and identify mass comments. Agencies are given the flexibility to post only representative samples of mass comments on their public dockets. The bill also mandates creating policies for managing these types of comments and necessitates updates to agency websites and systems to comply with these new requirements.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
The "Comment Integrity and Management Act of 2024" is a legislative proposal aimed at enhancing how federal agencies manage public comments during the regulatory review process. It seeks to amend the E-Government Act of 2002 to establish improved systems for handling both mass and computer-generated comments in a way that maintains their role as an essential aspect of regulatory oversight.
General Summary
The bill mandates that federal agencies develop procedures to ensure that electronic comments are submitted by humans whenever possible. It also calls for identification and systematic handling of mass comments, which are large volumes of identical or similar comments submitted by different individuals or groups. The legislation requires agencies to use technology and systems to verify comment authenticity and to label mass submissions accordingly. Furthermore, it sets timelines for agencies to update their systems in compliance with these new requirements.
Significant Issues
A primary concern with the bill is its lack of specificity in several important areas. It does not specify how the verification of human versus computer-generated comments will be practically implemented, nor does it clearly define what constitutes a mass comment or a computer-generated comment. This lack of precision could lead to inconsistent application across different agencies.
Additionally, the bill does not allocate specific funding or resources to support these new mandates, which raises concerns about additional costs that federal agencies may face, particularly smaller ones. Without a clear budgetary framework or financial support, there is a risk of financial strain, potentially affecting the effective implementation of the bill.
Impact on the Public
The act could have broad implications for public participation in the regulatory process. By improving the integrity of comments submitted electronically, the public's trust in the transparency and accountability of regulatory agencies could be strengthened. However, there is potential for public confusion or dissatisfaction if the guidelines for managing comments are inconsistently applied or if technological barriers impede participation.
Impact on Stakeholders
For federal agencies, this bill requires the adoption of new technologies and systems, which could increase operational burdens and necessitate additional funding. Larger agencies might better absorb these changes, but smaller agencies could face significant challenges without additional resources or guidance.
For advocacy groups and organizations that rely on mass commenting as a strategy to influence policy, the bill might complicate their efforts if their comments are systematically reduced to a single representative sample. This could diminish the perceived weight of public opinion in the regulatory process.
Overall, while the bill aims to enhance the regulatory process's integrity and efficiency, its success depends largely on how well its strategies are implemented and whether sufficient resources and guidance are provided to all stakeholders involved.
Issues
The bill does not specify the budget or resources allocated for implementing the new procedures and systems, which could lead to unforeseen expenditures, particularly for smaller agencies that may face financial strain. This issue is mentioned in Section 3.
The language used in defining 'mass comment' and 'computer-generated comment' lacks precision, especially in differentiating between similar terms and their practical implications, which might result in inconsistent application across agencies. This is addressed in Section 3.
There is no clear explanation of how the verification of human-submitted vs. computer-generated comments will be practically implemented or verified across different agencies, raising concerns about the feasibility of these processes. This is discussed in Section 3.
The section includes several future-oriented tasks without clear accountability measures or timelines for each action beyond the initial deadlines, which might result in inadequate implementation. Specific details are provided in Section 3.
The bill does not mention the potential costs involved in managing mass and computer-generated comments, nor any budgetary considerations, which could impact agency operations financially. This is noted in Section 2.
The Purpose section does not specify how Federal agencies should manage mass and computer-generated comments, which could lead to inconsistent implementation and a lack of uniform standards. This issue is highlighted in Section 2.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the bill provides the official name of the legislation, which is the "Comment Integrity and Management Act of 2024."
2. Purpose Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The purpose of this Act is to assist Federal agencies in handling mass and automated comments during the regulatory process, while ensuring that mass comments are still encouraged as they are essential to the process.
3. Improving integrity and management of mass comments and computer-generated comments in the regulatory review process Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section aims to enhance the integrity and management of electronic comments in the regulatory review process by ensuring they are submitted by humans, identifying mass comments, and managing computer-generated comments. It requires agencies to verify, identify, and label mass comments, and develop policies consistent with guidance issued by the Office of Management and Budget; it also involves updating systems and provides for a report on the prevalence and impact of computer-generated comments.