Overview
Title
To establish the Office of Executive Councils, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
H.R. 7523 wants to create a special office to help manage different groups that help the government make decisions, like how to buy things or use data better. This office will help these groups work smoothly together and check on them every year to make sure they're doing a good job.
Summary AI
H.R. 7523 aims to establish the Office of Executive Councils in the General Services Administration to support various executive councils in the government. These councils include the Chief Acquisition Officers Council, the Chief Data Officer Council, and others. The bill outlines responsibilities such as maintaining a public website, creating strategic plans, and offering advisory support to government branches. Additionally, it modifies the leadership roles and support systems for these councils, establishes a timeline for the office's existence, and requires annual reports on its activities.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
Summary of the Bill
The proposed bill, titled the "Governmentwide Executive Councils Reform Act," aims to establish the Office of Executive Councils within the General Services Administration (GSA). The bill outlines responsibilities for existing governmentwide executive councils, stipulating that they maintain public websites, develop charters and strategic plans, and serve as advisory bodies to government leaders. It reorganizes leadership roles within these councils and mandates annual reports on their activities to be submitted to key Senate and House Committees. It also includes technical amendments to the United States Code to update and organize legal text.
Significant Issues
One major issue with the bill is the lack of specific budgetary provisions or oversight mechanisms for the newly established Office of Executive Councils. This absence could lead to unrestricted spending and inefficiencies in resource allocation. Additionally, the responsibilities assigned to this Office, such as the potential for detailing GSA employees to different councils, raise concerns about resource strain and operational capacity.
Government executive councils are required to maintain a publicly accessible website and develop various charters and strategic plans. However, without standardized guidelines or synchronized efforts, these requirements could result in significant administrative costs and logistical challenges. Furthermore, the bill requires annual reports from the Government Accountability Office (GAO), but there is no defined consequence for non-compliance, which may impact accountability.
A noteworthy issue involves the restructuring of leadership roles within various councils. This restructuring lacks a clear rationale or demonstrated benefits, potentially leading to operational confusion and inefficiency. The bill places repeated administrative responsibilities on the Administrator of General Services, which might significantly increase their workload and necessitate additional resources without thorough justification.
Impact on the Public
Broadly, this bill may affect the public by aiming to enhance the transparency and coordination of federal government operations through robust executive councils. By making information about these councils accessible through public websites, the bill could increase government transparency, allowing the public to better understand the roles and missions of these councils.
However, the potential for increased administrative costs and inefficient resource utilization could indirectly impact taxpayers if these costs are not well managed. If the bill leads to improved government performance and effectiveness as intended, the public might benefit from enhanced government services.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
For government employees, particularly those within the GSA, the bill could mean increased workloads and job responsibilities because of the new Office's support roles. This could lead to staffing and resource management challenges if not addressed with additional funding or strategic planning.
Different federal councils potentially stand to benefit from the formalized support structure and advisory roles, fostering improved coordination and policy guidance. However, their effectiveness will heavily rely on how well roles and responsibilities are defined and managed under the new arrangements.
For Congress and oversight bodies, the structured reporting requirements to Senate and House Committees could offer enhanced insights into the workings of the executive councils, aiding in more informed decision-making. Yet, without clearly defined consequences for non-compliance, the efficacy of these reports remains uncertain.
In conclusion, while the bill aims to streamline and support governmentwide executive councils, its effectiveness will largely depend on addressing the outlined issues, especially regarding resource management and clarity in leadership roles. If successful, it holds the potential for more transparent and coordinated federal operations, benefiting both federal stakeholders and the general public.
Issues
Section 4(a)-(e): The establishment of the Office of Executive Councils and its outlined responsibilities lack clear budgetary provisions or oversight mechanisms, raising concerns about unchecked spending or resource allocation inefficiencies.
Section 3(1)-(5): The requirement for governmentwide executive councils to maintain a website and develop charters and strategic plans could lead to significant administrative costs and logistical challenges if guidelines are not standardized and efforts synchronized.
Section 6: The annual GAO report requirement does not include any penalties or consequences for non-compliance by the Administrator, raising concerns about accountability and enforcement effectiveness.
Section 5(a)-(e): The repeated designation of the Administrator of General Services to provide support to various councils could lead to an overwhelming workload and require additional resources for the General Services Administration, without adequate justification or analysis of necessity.
Section 4(e): The provision to terminate the Office of Executive Councils after 7 years could disrupt continuity in long-term planning and support if strategic goals are not achieved, potentially undermining project success and resource stability.
Section 4(b)(2): Detailing employees from the General Services Administration to support councils could strain the agency's resources, creating potential staffing and operational challenges without clear management strategies.
Section 5(b)-(e): The restructuring and reassignment of roles within councils without clear data or rationale on the benefits or necessity might lead to organizational confusion and ineffective council operations.
Section 7: The technical amendments involve striking and redesignating sections, with a lack of context or rationale, which could create uncertainty regarding their implications on ongoing processes.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section provides the short title for the legislation, allowing it to be referred to as the "Governmentwide Executive Councils Reform Act."
2. Definitions Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section defines several terms related to official positions and councils within the U.S. government. It explains the roles of the "Administrator" and "Director," and lists multiple executive councils, such as the Chief Acquisition Officers Council and the Chief Data Officer Council, each established under various sections of U.S. law.
3. Responsibilities of a covered governmentwide executive council Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Each government-wide executive council must keep a public website with information about their mission and members, and within a year, they need to publish a charter outlining their roles and responsibilities and a strategic plan outlining their goals. Additionally, they provide expert advice and analysis to government leaders and act as a key advisory group on federal performance and priority goals.
4. GSA Office of Executive Councils Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Office of Executive Councils is established within the General Services Administration (GSA) to support governmentwide executive councils by providing administrative help, loaning GSA employees when needed, and responding to Congressional requests. This office operates independently under a GSA employee chosen by the Deputy Director for Management and will close seven years after the Act is enacted unless continued by Congress. It is limited to assisting only councils authorized by law.
5. Harmonizing governmentwide executive council leadership roles Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section of the bill proposes changes to the leadership roles of various government councils, including the Chief Acquisition Officers Council, Chief Data Officer Council, Chief Financial Officers Council, Chief Human Capital Officers Council, and Performance Improvement Council. It updates titles and responsibilities, provides for administrative support by the Administrator of General Services, and establishes roles for chairpersons and vice-chairpersons within these councils.
6. GAO Annual report on the activities of the Office of Executive Councils Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The GAO Annual report requires the Administrator to submit a yearly report for six years to specific Senate and House Committees. The report must describe the activities and services of the Office of Executive Councils, account for the associated costs, and detail any projects or programs offered to governmentwide executive councils.
7. Technical amendments Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section makes technical changes to the United States Code by removing and renumbering certain paragraphs in sections related to financial management and information policy, ensuring the legal text is up-to-date and correctly organized.