Overview

Title

To prohibit data brokers from transferring sensitive data of United States individuals to foreign adversaries, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

H. R. 7520 is a rule that tries to keep people's private and important information safe by stopping companies from selling or sending it to countries that might be unsafe. It says that certain types of information, like where people are or their health details, need to be kept extra safe and secret.

Summary AI

H. R. 7520 aims to prevent data brokers from selling or sharing sensitive personal data of people living in the U.S. with foreign adversaries or entities controlled by them. The bill outlines a variety of data considered sensitive, such as financial and health information, precise location data, and private communications. It assigns the Federal Trade Commission the responsibility to enforce these restrictions, treating violations as unfair or deceptive practices. The Act would go into effect 60 days after being enacted.

Published

2024-03-05
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Introduced in House
Date: 2024-03-05
Package ID: BILLS-118hr7520ih

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
2
Words:
1,574
Pages:
8
Sentences:
37

Language

Nouns: 469
Verbs: 118
Adjectives: 108
Adverbs: 9
Numbers: 32
Entities: 54

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.21
Average Sentence Length:
42.54
Token Entropy:
5.10
Readability (ARI):
23.03

AnalysisAI

General Summary of the Bill

The bill titled "Protecting Americans’ Data from Foreign Adversaries Act of 2024" aims to restrict data brokers from transferring sensitive information of United States individuals to foreign adversaries. The legislation highlights the importance of safeguarding personal data from potentially hostile entities and assigns enforcement responsibilities to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). It emphasizes that the sale, transfer, or disclosure of various types of sensitive data, such as Social Security numbers, health records, and geolocation information, is unlawful if it is directed to foreign adversaries or entities under their control.

Summary of Significant Issues

Several issues emerge from the bill’s provisions:

  • Ambiguity in Defining "Foreign Adversary Country": The bill references another legal document (section 4872(d)(2) of title 10, United States Code) without specifying which countries qualify as foreign adversaries. This could create confusion for stakeholders trying to comply with the bill's requirements.

  • Broad Definition of "Sensitive Data": The bill includes an extensive list of data types under the term "sensitive data," which may lead to challenges in enforcement and compliance for data brokers due to its broad scope.

  • Control Definition Based on Stake: The threshold of a 20 percent stake by foreign entities to qualify as being "controlled by a foreign adversary" might not accurately reflect actual influence, potentially leading to inadequate targeting of true risks.

  • Lack of Detailed Penalties: The bill states that the FTC will enforce this law, but it does not specify the penalties, creating potential uncertainty regarding compliance consequences for violations.

  • Potential Loopholes with Service Providers: By excluding service providers from the "data broker" definition, the legislation could potentially enable some entities to avoid regulation by reclassifying themselves.

Impact on the Public and Specific Stakeholders

Broad Public Impact

The bill is significant in enhancing personal data security for U.S. individuals by limiting international transfers of sensitive information. This focus on data sovereignty could bolster national security and reduce the risk of foreign exploitation of personal data. However, the broad definition of "sensitive data" could mean that many types of data transactions are affected, possibly leading to operational challenges for businesses handling extensive customer information.

Impact on Data Brokers

For data brokers, compliance might become more challenging due to the extensive data types categorized as sensitive. The lack of clarity around penalties might also cause uncertainty in how the FTC will enforce the law. It could necessitate the overhaul of current data handling practices and tighter controls on data dealing.

Impact on Foreign Entities and Businesses

Foreign companies, especially those with ties to countries that might be considered adversaries, could face increased scrutiny and operational constraints in the U.S. market. This could affect their relationships with U.S. data brokers and service providers, potentially impacting foreign trade dynamics.

Impact on the Federal Trade Commission

The bill places significant enforcement responsibilities on the FTC, which means the agency must allocate resources to oversee compliance and address violations. This could require additional regulatory frameworks and potentially increase the agency's workload.

In conclusion, while the bill aims to protect U.S. individuals' data from reaching foreign adversaries, it introduces significant challenges and ambiguities that need to be addressed for effective implementation. Balancing robust data protection with practical enforcement will be crucial in achieving the legislation's intended objectives.

Issues

  • The definition of 'foreign adversary country' references section 4872(d)(2) of title 10, United States Code, making it potentially difficult for stakeholders to identify these countries, creating ambiguity in Section 2.

  • The definition of 'sensitive data' in Section 2 is extensive and broad, potentially leading to enforcement challenges and compliance difficulties for data brokers due to its inclusive nature, covering various types of personal information.

  • The term 'controlled by a foreign adversary' includes entities with a 20 percent stake by foreign entities, which could be seen as arbitrary and might not accurately represent control or influence over the entity in Section 2.

  • The enforcement language in Section 2 regarding the Federal Trade Commission lacks specifics about penalties, which can lead to uncertainty about the compliance requirements and consequences for violations.

  • The exclusion of 'service providers' from the definition of 'data broker' in Section 2 might be exploited, allowing entities to reclassify themselves to avoid regulation, potentially creating loopholes in the bill's intent.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The first section of this bill states that the official name of the legislation is the “Protecting Americans’ Data from Foreign Adversaries Act of 2024.”

2. Prohibition on transfer of sensitive data of United States individuals to foreign adversaries Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

In this section, it is illegal for data brokers to share sensitive data of Americans with foreign adversaries or entities they control. The Federal Trade Commission is responsible for enforcing this rule, and sensitive data includes personal information like Social Security numbers, health records, and precise location data.