Overview
Title
An Act To prohibit data brokers from transferring personally identifiable sensitive data of United States individuals to foreign adversaries, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
The bill wants to keep people's important information like where they are or their health records safe from foreign countries we don't like. It tells companies not to share this information with them, and if they do, they can get in trouble.
Summary AI
H.R. 7520, known as the “Protecting Americans’ Data from Foreign Adversaries Act of 2024,” aims to prevent data brokers from sharing sensitive personal information of Americans with foreign adversaries. It makes it illegal for data brokers to sell or give access to such data to any foreign adversary or any entity controlled by them. The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) will enforce this regulation, treating violations as unfair or deceptive business practices. The bill is designed to safeguard various types of sensitive data, such as financial information, health records, and geolocation details, and comes into effect 60 days after its passage.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
The bill titled the "Protecting Americans' Data from Foreign Adversaries Act of 2024" seeks to impose strict prohibitions on the transfer of personally identifiable sensitive data of individuals residing in the United States to foreign adversaries. As it currently stands, the legislation aims to restrict data brokers from engaging in any transactions that would allow U.S. individuals' sensitive personal information to be accessed by specified foreign entities. It confers enforcement powers to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and defines key terms such as "data broker," "foreign adversary," and "sensitive data."
General Summary of the Bill
At its core, this bill prohibits data brokers from selling or otherwise disseminating personally identifiable sensitive data of U.S. individuals to foreign adversaries or entities controlled by such adversaries. The FTC is tasked with enforcing these regulations under the existing framework of the Federal Trade Commission Act. The bill meticulously defines sensitive data to include various types of personal information such as Social Security numbers, financial details, biometric and genetic data, and information about individuals' health, communication, and even racial or religious identity. This wide-ranging definition implies a comprehensive approach to personal data protection.
Summary of Significant Issues
A significant concern raised is the potential loopholes in the bill, particularly regarding the definition of "data broker." Some entities may argue that they are excluded from the bill's stipulations by claiming that their operations involve providing products or services, rather than directly transferring personal data. Additionally, the criteria for what qualifies as "controlled by a foreign adversary" could be more explicit to avoid enforcement challenges. This ambiguity may lead to difficulties in establishing indirect control by foreign entities.
Moreover, the definition of "sensitive data" is expansive, which could result in substantial compliance burdens for companies handling personal data. The linkage of the term "foreign adversary country" to another section of U.S. Code may make it less understandable to the public without further clarification. Finally, there's concern regarding the FTC's effectiveness in managing the international dimension of data transfers, as its current enforcement capabilities may not fully address the complexities involved.
Impact on the Public
Broadly, the bill aims to enhance the privacy and protection of Americans' sensitive data by limiting its exposure to foreign adversaries. This could potentially bolster public confidence in data privacy, as it addresses growing concerns about the misuse of personal information. By defining a wide range of data types as sensitive, the legislation seeks to cover various aspects of privacy that could be exploited if left unregulated.
However, the expansive notion of sensitive data might necessitate extensive compliance measures, which some businesses may find challenging or costly. These operational burdens could be transferred to consumers in the form of increased prices for services reliant on data processing.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
For data brokerage firms and other businesses involved in data transactions, the bill presents both challenges and opportunities. While complying with new regulatory standards could drive operational costs upward, it also encourages the industry to reassess best practices and prioritize consumer data protection, potentially fostering trust with clients and partners.
For the Federal Trade Commission, the bill adds a significant layer of responsibility, potentially stretching its resources. It must adapt to effectively regulate and enforce these new rules, especially when dealing with international data movement.
On a larger scale, the bill pushes for greater accountability at the intersection of data privacy and national security, aiming to protect sensitive information from falling into the hands of foreign adversaries. While its effectiveness will depend heavily on precise implementation details and closing regulatory loopholes, the bill represents a decisive step towards tightening the control and safeguarding of personal data in an increasingly digitized world.
Issues
The term 'data broker' as defined in Section 2(c)(3) could create potential loopholes due to exclusions. Entities may claim exclusion while still engaging in the unauthorized transfer of data, arguing they merely provide certain products/services and not personally identifiable sensitive data transfers.
The definition of 'controlled by a foreign adversary' in Section 2(c)(2) might require clearer criteria for determining indirect control by foreign entities, making enforcement challenging without explicit guidelines.
The broad definition of 'sensitive data' in Section 2(c)(7) could include vast amounts of information, potentially overwhelming organizations attempting to comply with the law.
The reliance on Federal Trade Commission enforcement in Section 2(b) may not be sufficient to address the complexities of international data transactions and enforcement within foreign jurisdictions.
The linkage of the 'foreign adversary country' definition to an external section of the United States Code in Section 2(c)(4) requires cross-referencing, could be difficult to navigate, and might limit public understanding.
The exemption for 'service providers' in Section 2(c)(8) might allow entities to reclassify themselves to evade regulation by claiming they are processing data on behalf of non-foreign entities, potentially circumventing the prohibition.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of this bill states that the official name of the legislation is the “Protecting Americans’ Data from Foreign Adversaries Act of 2024.”
2. Prohibition on transfer of personally identifiable sensitive data of United States individuals to foreign adversaries Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill section makes it illegal for data brokers to share or sell sensitive personal information of people in the U.S. to foreign enemies or entities controlled by them. It defines key terms, outlines the Federal Trade Commission's role in enforcing this rule, and specifies what constitutes sensitive data, like Social Security numbers and private communications.